1556583396 M * Bertl_oO off to bed now ... have a good one everyone! 1556583398 N * Bertl_oO Bertl_zZ 1556587845 J * erratic ~paige@1.10.232.152 1556592558 Q * jrklein Remote host closed the connection 1556592619 J * jrklein ~cloud@34.234.31.16 1556594721 Q * gnarface Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556595263 J * gnarface ~gnarface@108-227-52-42.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net 1556595490 Q * erratic 1556606178 Q * dustinm` 1556606575 J * dustinm` ~dustinm`@68.ip-149-56-14.net 1556610213 J * hijacker ~nikolay@149.235.255.3 1556611929 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl 1556611932 M * Bertl morning folks! 1556614431 J * bzed_ ~bzed@bzed.netrep.oftc.net 1556614550 M * Bertl off for now ... bbl 1556614555 N * Bertl Bertl_oO 1556614654 Q * bzed Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556614656 N * bzed_ bzed 1556620294 Q * hijacker Remote host closed the connection 1556621620 J * fstd ~fstd@xdsl-78-34-126-63.nc.de 1556622092 Q * fstd_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556624385 J * hijacker ~nikolay@149.235.255.3 1556626382 M * Guy- can I have several vserver guests share a pool of memory? say, I have a client who has 4 guests, and I want to give him 16GB of memory on total, to be divided up among his guest processes as they need it 1556628114 M * daniel_hozac i guess you could set /etc/vservers//cgroup/name to client/, and setup the client cgroup yourself with the memory limit. 1556628121 M * daniel_hozac or have them all in the same cgroup 1556628158 M * Guy- yes, I want them all in the same cgroup, that's evident 1556628214 M * Guy- the approac with the named cgroup that I set up beforehand manually should work, thanks 1556628261 M * Guy- daniel_hozac: btw, glad to see you're not dead -- any chance of a new util-vserver release with some of the bugs reported on github fixed? :) 1556628309 M * daniel_hozac i don't think you should need to set it up manually either, if you just set the name directly to the same thing in the guests 1556628322 M * daniel_hozac i.e. don't do the hierarchy of client/ 1556628390 M * daniel_hozac my time is pretty scarce for the forseeable future, so i don't think it is super likely, but we'll see. 1556629131 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection 1556635810 Q * hijacker 1556636449 Q * torrunes Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556641313 Q * transacid Read error: Connection reset by peer 1556641622 J * transacid ~transacid@transacid.de 1556642189 Q * transacid Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556642386 J * transacid ~transacid@transacid.de 1556643687 Q * transacid Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556645307 J * transacid ~transacid@transacid.de 1556649632 J * _pa ~pav@141-136-185-31.dsl.iskon.hr 1556652046 Q * thithib Quit: reboot 1556652593 J * obeardly ~obeardly@2603:3011:1661:0:b66d:83ff:feae:fbcd 1556652970 J * thithib ~thithib@219.ip-193-70-1.eu 1556653080 Q * bzed Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556657696 J * Aiken ~Aiken@b951.h.jbmb.net 1556658293 Q * Guy- Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1556661316 J * Guy- ~korn@0002809d.user.oftc.net 1556664980 Q * _pa Quit: Leaving 1556665750 J * _pa ~pav@141-136-185-31.dsl.iskon.hr 1556665761 Q * _pa 1556666731 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection