1534295105 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection 1534303703 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1534304289 J * FireEgl Fire_OFTC@2001:470:e56c:1:4015:1cd6:5300:2f32 1534308070 J * Aiken ~Aiken@b951.h.jbmb.net 1534318251 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1534318842 J * FireEgl Fire_OFTC@2001:470:e56c:1:4015:1cd6:5300:2f32 1534322505 Q * transacid Quit: reboot 1534327701 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1534333245 J * FireEgl Fire_OFTC@2001:470:e56c:1:b023:461e:794d:7ceb 1534336269 Q * romster Quit: Leaving 1534336321 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection 1534339574 J * romster ~romster@158.140.215.184 1534358842 Q * fstd_ Read error: Connection reset by peer 1534358850 J * fstd ~fstd@xdsl-78-35-64-25.netcologne.de 1534359231 J * transacid ~transacid@transacid.de 1534359322 J * fstd_ ~fstd@xdsl-78-34-125-225.netcologne.de 1534359707 Q * fstd Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1534361756 J * Hurga ~hurga@000131c9.user.oftc.net 1534361918 P * Hurga 1534361960 J * Hurga ~hurga@000131c9.user.oftc.net 1534362839 F * Bertl_oO +v Hurga 1534362842 Q * transacid Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1534362855 F * Bertl_oO +v FireEgl 1534362858 F * Bertl_oO +v fstd_ 1534362863 F * Bertl_oO +v funnel_ 1534362868 F * Bertl_oO +v gnarface 1534362873 F * Bertl_oO +v mcp 1534362876 F * Bertl_oO +v romster 1534362885 F * Bertl_oO +v yang_ 1534362885 M * Hurga Thanks Bertl. 1534362902 J * transacid ~transacid@transacid.de 1534362911 M * Bertl_oO you're welcome! 1534362959 M * Hurga Is there a way to run OpenVPN with TAP interface in a guest? The docs only talk about TUN. 1534362991 M * Guy- Hurga: it shouldn't really matter whether it's tun or tap, I think 1534363026 M * Guy- you should definitely give the guest its own network namespace in either case 1534363073 M * Hurga Please explain... its own IP? 1534363094 M * Guy- no, its own namespace, as in https://lwn.net/Articles/531114/ 1534363118 M * Guy- or, more specifically, https://lwn.net/Articles/219794/ 1534363213 M * Bertl_oO you can also run OpenVPN without network namespaces with a preallocated tun 1534363214 M * Hurga Sorry, I'm not a developer. 1534363229 M * Bertl_oO but there are some restrictions to that 1534363230 M * Guy- Hurga: you don't need to be a developer, but it helps to understand how things work 1534363263 M * Guy- Bertl_oO: I guess you can, but I don't think it's very useful -- OpenVPN needs to be able to add routes, for example, and if you allow it to do that, you might as well run it in the host context 1534363285 M * Guy- Hurga: you may find this ML thread helpful: http://archives.linux-vserver.org/201610/0001.html 1534363341 M * Hurga Guy-: well it talks about patches and I have no idea how it relates to linux-vserver. I've been using linux-vserver since 2001 or somesuch, but that doesn't mean I know how everything works... 1534363354 M * Hurga ah, the last link looks helpful. 1534363417 M * Hurga but since no one replied... 1534363998 M * Guy- Hurga: no patches are involved; but I think you need working knowledge of what network namespaces are, how they work and what they are (can be) used for 1534364019 M * Guy- if you don't like the lwn article, there are many others; Google is your frind 1534364021 M * Guy- *friend, even 1534364104 M * Guy- once you have that, you'll need to know how you give your guest its own network namespace, which is where the great flower page and the linked thread come in 1534364138 M * Guy- I can't give you cookbook-like help because I have never done this, I only know what the solution would look like 1534364185 M * Hurga Yeah, thanks. I guess I can figure it out, but it looks like a dead end for what I want to do anyway. 1534364206 M * Hurga But it's interesting stuff... I wish I had more time. 1534364210 M * Guy- would you like to share with us what you want to do? maybe we can suggest a solution 1534364296 Q * fstd_ Remote host closed the connection 1534364316 M * Hurga I wanted to use a vserver guest as an OpenVPN endpoint for internet connection. I prefer not to have too much stuff runnign on the host, but it doesn't look like it would make a lot of difference, security-wise, and just makes the config more complex. 1534364338 M * Guy- I would tend to agree 1534364361 M * Guy- it adds a lot of complexity with relatively little benefit 1534364383 M * Guy- there are howtos for setting up openvpn in its own network namespace, of that I'm fairly certain 1534364387 M * Bertl_oO depends on _why_ you want to put the VPN in a container 1534364414 M * Guy- yes, obviously if the reason is that you'd like a dedicated vpn link for that container, that's a different thing 1534364432 M * Guy- but from what you say I gather the vpn link would be for the entire host 1534364505 M * Hurga as I said, just an endpoint for some other location. Doesn't really matter if it runs on the host on in the guest, 1534364529 M * Hurga I just prefer to have as little running on the server as possible to keep things tidy. 1534365204 J * Aiken ~Aiken@2001:44b8:2168:1000:b26e:bfff:fe2a:b951 1534365417 M * Bertl_oO for simple isolation and a well known constant connection, Linux-VServer is probably a good choice after all, even without namespaces 1534370185 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection 1534370202 J * Aiken ~Aiken@2001:44b8:2168:1000:b26e:bfff:fe2a:b951 1534372298 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection 1534372369 J * Aiken ~Aiken@2001:44b8:2168:1000:b26e:bfff:fe2a:b951