1508890092 Q * nikolay_ Quit: Leaving
1508895205 J * aj_ ~aj@p2003008E6C1784007CF5BB6169F4D8C6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
1508895513 Q * aj_mob_sisu Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508899698 J * fstd_ ~fstd@x4db5208b.dyn.telefonica.de
1508900162 Q * fstd Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508900162 N * fstd_ fstd
1508902148 Q * tokkee Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508902349 J * tokkee tokkee@osprey.tokkee.org
1508907092 Q * [4-tea-2] Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508907316 J * [4-tea-2] ~WurstFing@sid.a42.de
1508909729 M * Bertl_oO  off to bed now ... have a good one everyone!
1508909731 N * Bertl_oO Bertl_zZ
1508917967 J * nikolay ~nikolay@149.235.255.3
1508920173 Q * aj_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508921834 J * aj_ ~aj@b2b-94-79-172-98.unitymedia.biz
1508930033 J * aj__ ~aj@b2b-94-79-172-100.unitymedia.biz
1508930388 J * aj_mob_sisu ~aj@b2b-94-79-172-98.unitymedia.biz
1508930407 Q * aj_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508930707 Q * aj__ Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508930708 Q * aj_mob_sisu Remote host closed the connection
1508930713 J * aj_mob_sisu ~aj@p57bf830e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
1508931849 J * hjf288 ~smuxi@cpc109027-salf6-2-0-cust228.10-2.cable.virginm.net
1508931911 M * hjf288 hey guys, have a quick question - has anyone managed to use AUFS with a Linux VServer kernel? This is around 4 years old but I'm assuming it's still correct: http://aufs-users.narkive.com/j8VyHC5u/compile-problems-size-of-unnamed-array-is-negative-in-cpup-c
1508931960 M * Guy- no (just to show you people are alive in here)
1508932214 M * Ghislain i am not sure i qualify as alive
1508932304 M * hjf288 :)
1508932315 M * Ghislain right now the ext4 is well supported but other FS are quite not, xfs diverged from the patch and we do not had any toher work i thik on others
1508932880 M * hjf288 I thought it would be worth checking if someone had a patched AuFS that was vserver compatibile just in case before I look at alternative solutions - I can't use OverlayFS either (although it does compile/work) as the functionality I need is only in the 4.2+ Kernel
1508932904 M * hjf288 but appreciate the response - will have to come up with something else
1508933111 M * Guy- what's the problem you're trying to solve, btw?
1508933969 Q * Ghislain Quit: Leaving.
1508934042 J * Ghislain ~ghislain@adsl1.aqueos.com
1508934230 M * hjf288 trying to boot a machine with a ro filesystem and use a union FS to capture the writes to a tmpfs based upper layer
1508934238 M * hjf288 *ro filesystem over NFS
1508934398 M * CcxWrk hjf288: There is FUSE implementation of unionfs, but yeah, FUSE has it's set of issues.
1508934423 M * CcxWrk Copy mutable parts of FS to tmpfs not being an option?
1508936667 M * Guy- hjf288: yes, or how about bind mounts?
1508936700 M * Guy- I did something similar with a tmpfs mounted on /writable, with mutable stuff from the read-only fs symlinked into /writable
1508936775 M * hjf288 it's possible, would just require more work than using the union FS :)
1508936990 M * hjf288 was mainly looking into whether the union fs based solutions were feasible first, as they don't appear to be - will be looking at a workaround
1508938363 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl
1508938367 M * Bertl  morning folks!
1508938387 M * Bertl hjf288: and this works reliably in 4.2?
1508938491 M * hjf288 Hi Bertl, I can't check because there is no vserver for 4.2 but the overlay module in 4.2 does have the commits that allow it to use nfs for lower directories from what I can see
1508938508 M * Bertl btw, unless you need/want any of the vserver specific attributes and checks, you should be fine with unmodified AUFS
1508938560 M * Bertl regarding 4.2, I would at least test if that works without vserver patch :)
1508938745 M * hjf288 I couldn't get AUFS to compile
1508938762 M * hjf288 After a bit of Googling, I came across this: http://aufs-users.narkive.com/j8VyHC5u/compile-problems-size-of-unnamed-array-is-negative-in-cpup-c
1508938781 M * hjf288 which would be the same issue I'm having with it
1508938957 M * hjf288 which is what lead me to look at OverlayFS (and discovering the fix for using it against NFS being in 4.2)
1508939051 M * hjf288 however using a 4.2 kernel rules it out as being able to use vserver is a requirement
1508940945 M * AlexanderS Another alternative would be, that you backport the fixes for overlayfs into a vserver supported kernel.
1508940992 M * Bertl indeed
1508941028 M * Bertl but patches for 4.2 are in the works, despite the fact that I didn't have too much time for it recently
1508941532 M * CcxWrk Bertl: Do you have approximate ETA? I'm due to replace failing SSD and would like to couple that with kernel upgrade. :-)
1508941542 M * CcxWrk (Also switch to F2FS)
1508941921 M * Bertl unfortunately no ETA at the moment
1508946538 Q * nikolay Quit: Leaving
1508950528 M * Bertl  off for now ... bbl
1508950530 N * Bertl Bertl_oO
1508954372 Q * aj_mob_sisu Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1508957119 M * hjf288 Oh thats cool, I wasn't aware :)
1508957133 M * hjf288 I do suspect it will be too late for my project though
1508960813 Q * padde Remote host closed the connection
1508960901 J * padde ~padde@patrick-nagel.net
1508961521 J * aj_mob_sisu ~aj@p2003008E6C1784007CF5BB6169F4D8C6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
1508966374 Q * arekm Quit: leaving
1508966437 J * arekm ~arekm@phobos.pld-linux.org
1508975186 M * Bertl_oO  off for a nap ... bbl
1508975188 N * Bertl_oO Bertl_zZ