1423702346 Q * transacid Remote host closed the connection
1423702802 Q * fstd Remote host closed the connection
1423702845 J * fstd ~fstd@xdsl-87-78-8-240.netcologne.de
1423703447 J * transacid ~transacid@transacid.de
1423722501 J * Ghislain ~aqueos@adsl1.aqueos.com
1423729334 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@fw.gkh-setu.de
1423729826 J * BenG ~BenG@cpc29-aztw22-2-0-cust128.18-1.cable.virginm.net
1423732107 J * padde_ ~padde@patrick-nagel.net
1423732107 Q * padde Read error: Connection reset by peer
1423732120 N * padde_ padde
1423734635 Q * _Shiva_ Remote host closed the connection
1423736506 J * _Shiva_ shiva@whatcha.looking.at
1423736751 Q * _Shiva_ 
1423736753 J * _Shiva_ shiva@whatcha.looking.at
1423740444 Q * dustinm` Remote host closed the connection
1423741071 J * dustinm` ~dustinm`@2607:5300:100:200::160d
1423743899 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection
1423744373 Q * _Shiva_ Remote host closed the connection
1423746004 Q * fstd Remote host closed the connection
1423746052 J * fstd ~fstd@xdsl-87-78-9-24.netcologne.de
1423746318 J * _Shiva_ shiva@whatcha.looking.at
1423749746 J * Wermwud ~Wermwud@69-29-150-18.stat.centurytel.net
1423753188 Q * BenG Quit: I Leave
1423757306 M * AlexanderS I have a new problem with 2.3.7.3. If I have a listening sockets on [::] in on vserver, I could not open a socket on [::] in another vserver. The guest does not share any ip.
1423757750 Q * derjohn_mob Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1423758003 Q * opuk Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1423758190 M * Ghislain the isolation do not work for ipv6 i think
1423758205 J * opuk ~kupo@h-1-5.a176.priv.bahnhof.se
1423758207 M * Ghislain if you use ipv6 it will not be isolated
1423758230 M * Ghislain i mean for the local address
1423758258 M * Ghislain but i could missed something here as i do not use ipv6 i am so '80
1423758435 M * AlexanderS It was working before. I know I have no "::1" but that's ok for me. The problem is, that the bind on [::] in some way influence other guests.
1423758750 M * Bertl ipv6 isolation is supposed to work fine, but untested (as I do not use ipv6)
1423758797 M * Bertl if there is a regression, please create a simple test case and let me know what kernel worked and which one doesn't
1423759404 M * Ghislain oh ok cool, bertl is there ipv6 ::1 also ?
1423759476 M * Ghislain hum ok Alexander answered this one
1423759635 M * AlexanderS Ghislain: ::1 work with network namespaces ;)
1423759702 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@88.128.80.3
1423760233 M * Ghislain yes that would be the solution, never tried isolation works so well with no perf loses
1423760285 Q * derjohn_mob Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1423760421 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@88.128.80.17
1423761347 J * bonbons ~bonbons@2001:a18:209:b801:4de2:a1ff:ae81:d973
1423763566 Q * derjohn_mob Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1423766501 M * Bertl off for a nap ... bbl
1423766510 N * Bertl Bertl_zZ
1423771412 J * Aiken ~Aiken@d63f.h.jbmb.net
1423771844 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@tmo-109-190.customers.d1-online.com
1423777487 Q * DoberMann Remote host closed the connection
1423778051 Q * bonbons Quit: Leaving
1423779082 Q * mfohbn Quit: leaving
1423781643 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl
1423781646 M * Bertl back now ...
1423782235 M * undefined Bertl: is there any reason why you disabled USER_NS (ie made it depend on VSERVER_DISABLED in Kconfig) in the 3.10 patch?
1423782287 M * undefined i applied your pidns delta patch and my userns patch (both for 3.14) to 3.10 and it appears to work fine, both linux-vserver and lxc
1423782296 M * undefined so i was just curious if there's something that i'm overlooking
1423782534 M * Bertl it was disabled for some time, we just recently "enabled" it for newer patches
1423782577 M * undefined is there a reason why it was disabled?
1423782596 M * Bertl because it didn't work before :)
1423782601 M * undefined hehehe
1423782604 M * undefined okay, just making sure
1423782620 M * undefined i know USER_NS broke linux-vserver if it was enabled
1423782639 M * undefined but my patch insures that USER_NS isn't used for vservers (by default)
1423782647 M * Bertl it might work in older kernels now as well, so if you tested it with recent util-vserver, I'm fine with enabling it on older patches
1423782662 M * undefined it appears to work for my standard test case
1423782676 M * undefined testme, testfs, vserver start/enter/stop
1423785564 M * Jb_boin running vserver and lxc on the same system works on recent kernels?
1423785585 M * Bertl yep. at least it is supposed to work fine