1307324059 Q * DreamerC Remote host closed the connection 1307325803 J * DreamerC ~DreamerC@122-116-181-118.HINET-IP.hinet.net 1307331006 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307331634 J * FireEgl ~FireEgl@173-16-9-3.client.mchsi.com 1307334105 J * sannes ~ace@cm-84.209.81.224.getinternet.no 1307336523 M * Bertl off to bed now ... have a good one everyone! 1307336528 N * Bertl Bertl_zZ 1307339417 J * nkukard ~nkukard@41-133-112-179.dsl.mweb.co.za 1307339905 Q * arekm Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307340363 J * arekm ~arekm@ixion.pld-linux.org 1307341775 Q * derjohn_foo Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307341775 Q * fback Remote host closed the connection 1307341777 J * fback fback@red.fback.net 1307341786 J * derjohn_foo ~aj@p4FFD335C.dip.t-dialin.net 1307343249 Q * derjohn_foo Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307344521 J * BenG ~bengreen@cpc12-aztw24-2-0-cust146.aztw.cable.virginmedia.com 1307346035 Q * BenG Quit: I Leave 1307346052 J * BenG ~bengreen@cpc12-aztw24-2-0-cust146.aztw.cable.virginmedia.com 1307346162 J * _nono_ ~gomes@licencieux.ircam.fr 1307346215 J * petzsch ~markus@dslb-092-078-148-135.pools.arcor-ip.net 1307346277 Q * petzsch 1307346317 J * petzsch ~markus@dslb-092-078-148-135.pools.arcor-ip.net 1307348031 J * derjohn_foo ~aj@213.238.45.2 1307348363 J * ghislain ~AQUEOS@adsl2.aqueos.com 1307348811 J * kir ~kir@swsoft-msk-nat.sw.ru 1307349372 Q * petzsch Quit: Leaving. 1307356310 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl 1307356313 M * Bertl morning folks! 1307359725 J * BenG_ ~bengreen@cpc12-aztw24-2-0-cust146.aztw.cable.virginmedia.com 1307359725 Q * BenG Read error: Connection reset by peer 1307359959 Q * BenG_ Remote host closed the connection 1307360274 J * BenG ~bengreen@cpc12-aztw24-2-0-cust146.aztw.cable.virginmedia.com 1307360513 J * ensc|w ~ensc@www.sigma-chemnitz.de 1307362466 Q * BenG Remote host closed the connection 1307362936 J * ryker ~Adium@c-76-16-115-27.hsd1.in.comcast.net 1307364706 M * monrad-51468 anyone knows if vserver works with multiqueue netcards? 1307364718 M * monrad-51468 it seems the interrupt load is only on one core 1307364901 M * daniel_hozac if you set it up. 1307364911 M * daniel_hozac not really Linux-VServer related, just Linux... 1307364918 M * Bertl it's not different from any other linux setup 1307365329 M * monrad-51468 well we tested it and it seemed that the hosts machine traffic was balanced but not the vservers 1307365348 M * monrad-51468 we thought there might be some trickery like it not working when you have bonding enabled 1307365496 M * Bertl the host traffic or the verser traffic when it is done from the host? 1307365513 M * Bertl because different traffic also means different handling in the network stack 1307365519 J * petzsch ~markus@dslb-092-078-148-135.pools.arcor-ip.net 1307367175 J * ghislain1 ~AQUEOS@adsl2.aqueos.com 1307367417 Q * ghislain Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307367494 P * kir Leaving. 1307367788 M * monrad-51468 setting stuff in /sys/class/net/eth0/queues/rx-0/rps_cpus seems to work fine :) 1307369565 Q * ex Quit: Lost terminal 1307369608 Q * click Remote host closed the connection 1307369613 J * click click@ti0127a340-0467.bb.online.no 1307369695 J * ex ex@valis.net.pl 1307370485 Q * ghislain1 Quit: Leaving. 1307370764 J * hparker ~hparker@2001:470:1f0f:32c:beae:c5ff:fe01:b647 1307371337 J * dowdle ~dowdle@scott.coe.montana.edu 1307372304 Q * petzsch Quit: Leaving. 1307372508 Q * ncopa Quit: Leaving 1307374013 J * petzsch ~markus@dslb-092-078-148-135.pools.arcor-ip.net 1307374746 M * ryker Bertl: Is there any way to reboot the guest and have it run the init scripts? I've always been using 'reboot -f' to reboot a guest, but I didn't realize that command didn't run the init scripts for shutdown. 1307374815 M * daniel_hozac it should... 1307374824 M * Bertl hmm, if the init style is sysv, it should 1307374828 M * daniel_hozac obviously depends on your initstyle and how your guest is setup. 1307374929 M * ryker this is for centos guests on a centos host 1307374961 M * ryker maybe i'm just doing it wrong. just running 'reboot' inside a guest doesn't work 1307375001 M * Bertl reboot is an alias for telinit (without the -f) 1307375013 M * Bertl so what it does is contact init to reboot the guest 1307375029 M * Bertl on a guest with sysv init style, there is no init, so it fails 1307375062 M * Bertl OTOH, if you configure plain init style, a guest init will be started and this will work 1307375090 M * daniel_hozac reboot -f in CentOS guests will run the shutdown scripts. 1307375171 M * ryker hmm. it reboots really fast, and there is no console output about init scripts shutting down, so i assumed it wasn't running them. 1307375184 M * ryker i'll have to write a test script for shutdown and see if it runs 1307375207 M * ryker sry, i guess I should have done that before bugging you guys. 1307375459 M * ryker daniel_hozac & Bertl: You are correct. reboot -f does indeed run the init scripts. I put a simple echo "stopping" > /somefile in the stop section of one of my application init scripts and it worked. 1307375464 M * ryker sry to bother you about this 1307375654 Q * derjohn_foo Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307376025 J * ghislain ~AQUEOS@adsl2.aqueos.com 1307376338 M * ghislain seems the latest vserver utils is nto compatile with 2.6.36-vs2.3.0.36.38, is there a change in the api that is disabled by no legacy flag ? 1307376355 J * bonbons ~bonbons@2001:960:7ab:0:f904:67a5:2ff7:7a4 1307376398 M * ghislain the error i got with the last one's is: naddress: vc_net_add(): Function not implemented 1307376398 M * ghislain ^^ 1307378150 M * nicholi MooingLemur: thanks for that tidbit...so long ago :) i'll try it now 1307378161 M * nicholi i was wondering where i could find ipv6 nameservers before... 1307378188 M * daniel_hozac ghislain: 2981 should fix it 1307378554 Q * petzsch Quit: Leaving. 1307378642 J * petzsch ~markus@dslb-092-078-148-135.pools.arcor-ip.net 1307378864 M * ghislain ok thanks daniel i will try that very soon ! :) 1307380890 J * imcsk8 ~ichavero@148.229.1.11 1307382918 Q * Piet Quit: Piet 1307383358 M * nicholi 1307384379 M * Bertl yeah mate :) 1307385535 M * nicholi MooingLemur: maybe you can give me another pointer when you return, seems like most things are working now...i can resolve alot of ipv6 domains, but i can't use apt-get on the vserver now at all because none of the ubuntu repo's will resolve 1307385769 M * MooingLemur I'm not ubuntu-savvy, but I suspect there's some repo that you can use that's IPv6-enabled. 1307385886 M * MooingLemur on all of my "IPv6-only" vservers, I also have a natted IPv4 so that they can at least reach IPv4 hosts. 1307385939 M * MooingLemur I think you could create a tap0 interface or something to stick your v4 addresses on and do some routing and SNAT. 1307385970 M * MooingLemur nicholi: ^ 1307385979 M * Bertl who would handle the tap0? 1307386018 M * MooingLemur nothing would need to, I don't think.. it'd just be a place for the addresses to sit. 1307386045 M * Bertl so why not use the real interface then, or if you must, use dummy0? 1307386071 M * MooingLemur doesn't dummy0 throw things away that are destined for it? 1307386114 M * Bertl well, and tap0 directs it to the connected process, so? 1307386125 M * MooingLemur I was just thinking of a way to avoid creating unnecessary NAT-side traffic on a physical segment. 1307386145 M * MooingLemur in my installations, the nat side does correspond to a physical segment, so I do use the other interface :) 1307386227 M * nicholi ugh, network speak :p 1307386297 M * MooingLemur maybe the tap thing wouldn't work. 1307386298 M * nicholi what would be the simplest means to share an IPv4 address amongst the guests then? 1307386341 M * MooingLemur nicholi: on another host, I just configure an existing IPv4 on the host for the vserver, with nodev in the interfaces/1 directory 1307386405 M * MooingLemur nicholi: as long as you trust the users of the vserver not to bind unnecessary ports on the IPv4 address, that approach may work, too 1307386436 M * nicholi hmm, unfortunately not 1307386494 M * MooingLemur then you're probably best off just using some sort of NAT for their v4 1307386558 M * MooingLemur Bertl: thanks for making me rethink that tap idea :P 1307386585 M * Bertl assign a private IP for each guest, then nat it to the host IP for inbound/outbound (or a different public one) 1307386641 M * MooingLemur * MooingLemur is ~troy@ipv4.pinchaser.com 1307386693 M * MooingLemur that's a shared nodev one, though.. not a nat. 1307386807 M * nicholi what would the difference be? a possible security risk by sharing the device? 1307386842 M * nicholi oh wait you already mentioned that 1307386900 M * nicholi i'm just surprised none of the ubuntu repo's are available over ipv6... or i'm missing something completely 1307386967 M * MooingLemur the only security risk I can think of is someone binding, say, their sshd to that IP. They can't see each other's traffic, necessarily, but they can open ports. 1307386987 M * nicholi yeah, i don't want them using the ipv4 address for that 1307387036 M * Bertl in a potentially hostile environment, avoid sharing IPs between guests or between guest and host 1307387051 M * MooingLemur yeah, as Bertl said, give each one an IP in another subnet, and set up iptables rules to NAT them out a host's IP 1307387318 M * nicholi never had to setup a NAT before, but i'm sure it'll be a learning experience 1307387476 M * Bertl if it's just outgoing traffic you are interested in, simple masquerading will do 1307387533 M * Bertl if you are using shorewall or similar, it should already provide the mechanisms for that, otherwise something like 1307387563 M * Bertl iptables -t nat -A FORWAR -s -o -j MASQUERADE 1307387565 M * Bertl should do 1307387876 Q * Romster Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307388307 J * Romster ~romster@202.168.100.149.dynamic.rev.eftel.com 1307388448 M * nicholi yeah i don't really plan for anything coming into the guest over ipv4 1307388538 M * nicholi that was the intention for what their ipv6 addresses would be for 1307388562 M * nicholi since you can get 18 quintillion :) 1307389638 J * Piet ~Piet__@1RDAAAML1.tor-irc.dnsbl.oftc.net 1307391338 Q * sannes Remote host closed the connection 1307391793 J * hijacker_ ~hijacker@87-126-142-51.btc-net.bg 1307393212 Q * bonbons Quit: Leaving 1307393652 Q * hijacker_ Quit: Leaving 1307393790 Q * Piet Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307393953 Q * nicholi Remote host closed the connection 1307394020 J * click_ click@ti0127a340-0505.bb.online.no 1307394256 Q * click Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307394336 J * Piet ~Piet__@1RDAAAMN4.tor-irc.dnsbl.oftc.net 1307395094 J * nicholi ~nicholi@12.232.116.66 1307395361 J * ksn ~ksn@41.146.192.32 1307395380 M * MooingLemur s/FORWAR/POSTROUTING/ 1307395475 M * Bertl yep, thanks! 1307395701 Q * ksn Quit: leaving 1307395876 Q * petzsch Quit: Leaving. 1307396037 N * click_ click 1307396645 Q * ghislain Quit: Leaving. 1307400551 Q * dowdle Remote host closed the connection 1307401014 J * manana ~mayday090@nat049-252-205-109.tvoe.tv 1307401780 J * BenG ~bengreen@cpc12-aztw24-2-0-cust146.aztw.cable.virginmedia.com 1307402495 J * derjohn_foo ~aj@d065110.adsl.hansenet.de 1307402885 N * ensc Guest3672 1307402894 J * ensc ~irc-ensc@p5DF2F468.dip.t-dialin.net 1307403304 Q * Guest3672 Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1307404664 Q * BenG Quit: I Leave