1220745685 J * quasisane ~sanep@c-75-68-62-13.hsd1.nh.comcast.net 1220746451 J * oliwel_ ~chatzilla@ppp-88-217-14-251.dynamic.mnet-online.de 1220746688 Q * oliwel Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220746703 N * oliwel_ oliwel 1220747222 J * ntrs ~ntrs@77.29.79.125 1220747706 Q * ntrs Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220751042 J * jsambrook ~jsambrook@aelfric.plus.com 1220752101 Q * yarihm Quit: Leaving 1220753329 M * daniel_hozac oliwel: filesystems relying on umount for proper operation are broken. 1220754849 Q * androsch Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220758674 Q * derjohn_foo Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220761217 Q * kiorky_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220762058 J * kiorky ~kiorky@cryptelium.net 1220765416 J * ntrs ~ntrs@77.29.77.145 1220770510 J * balbir_ ~balbir@12.168.228.200 1220771547 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@e180205209.adsl.alicedsl.de 1220772298 Q * pisco Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220772742 J * pisco ~pisco@tor.noreply.org 1220773014 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl 1220773019 M * Bertl morning folks! 1220774262 J * loddafnir ~mike@chello080108111137.5.11.univie.teleweb.at 1220776842 P * jsambrook 1220777079 M * oliwel Bertl: Morning.... 1220777168 N * DoberMann[ZZZzzz] DoberMann 1220778030 Q * ntrs Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220778587 J * SlackLnx ~Lee@bl7-137-8.dsl.telepac.pt 1220782217 J * xdr ~xdr@4-173-96-87.cust.blixtvik.se 1220783293 Q * oliwel Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.83 [Firefox 3.0.1/2008070206] 1220783384 J * dennis ~dennis@dslb-084-059-217-038.pools.arcor-ip.net 1220783530 Q * dennis Remote host closed the connection 1220786653 M * Bertl okay, off for now ... bbl 1220786659 N * Bertl Bertl_oO 1220787007 M * sid3windr vxW: [»ps«,10709:#10001|10001|0] did lookup hidden ffff810079fb64b0[#0,2] »/dev/pts/0«. 1220787011 M * sid3windr what be this? :/ 1220787368 M * daniel_hozac you're using older utils on a recent kernel and ran ps from a vserver ... enter shell. 1220787428 M * daniel_hozac (it's still going to appear with recent utils) 1220788782 M * sid3windr ahh 1220788786 M * sid3windr yea, that's very possible =) 1220788787 M * sid3windr thanks 1220788802 J * bonbons ~bonbons@2001:960:7ab:0:2c0:9fff:fe2d:39d 1220788807 M * sid3windr I was trying to debug some failing stuff but apparently my disk was just full ;( 1220789908 Q * pisco Remote host closed the connection 1220790236 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection 1220790283 J * pisco_ ~pisco@tor.noreply.org 1220791953 J * ntrs ~ntrs@77.29.194.202 1220796821 N * ensc Guest5748 1220796821 Q * Guest5748 Remote host closed the connection 1220796831 J * ensc ~irc-ensc@77.235.182.26 1220797097 J * larsivi ~larsivi@169.80-202-217.nextgentel.com 1220797432 J * vargadani ~vargadani@catv-89-135-16-217.catv.broadband.hu 1220797541 M * vargadani hey there... is there a special way how vserver handles 127.0.0.1? 1220797561 M * daniel_hozac yes. 1220797669 M * vargadani thank you ^_^ 1220797764 J * ntrs_ ~ntrs@77.29.194.202 1220797911 Q * ntrs Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220798688 Q * ntrs_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220805325 M * vargadani there was somebody who had a Ubuntu 8.04 install and used a backport kernel from Etch I believe... 1220805344 M * vargadani i only know how to recompile the kernel and use that one 1220805363 M * vargadani can sb give me some more info on alternate ways of getting ubuntu run with vserver? 1220805749 J * blues blues@ada117.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl 1220805867 Q * blues_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220806507 Q * pmenier Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220806604 M * pmjdebruijn vargadani: that's too nasty to even speak of 1220806617 M * pmjdebruijn vargadani: compile your own kernel (2.6.22.19-vs2.2.0.7) 1220806636 M * vargadani yeah... that is what i did 1220806662 M * vargadani but the only thing I can right now think of is that for some reason my kernel just doesn't work 1220806666 M * vargadani as it is expected.... 1220806679 M * vargadani or maybe I do something seriously wrong 1220806780 M * vargadani it will be enough for today.. will go on tomorrow 1220806857 Q * derjohn_mob Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220807412 J * pmenier ~pmenier@ACaen-152-1-76-245.w83-115.abo.wanadoo.fr 1220807726 J * yarihm ~yarihm@85-62-239-77-pool.cable.fcom.ch 1220808127 Q * pmenier Quit: Konversation terminated! 1220808273 J * pmenier ~pmenier@ACaen-152-1-76-245.w83-115.abo.wanadoo.fr 1220808556 N * pmenier pmenier_off 1220809991 Q * doener Remote host closed the connection 1220810587 N * Bertl_oO Bertl 1220810593 M * Bertl back now ... 1220810672 Q * esa Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220811729 J * doener ~doener@i577BA644.versanet.de 1220812332 M * vargadani ahm... i had a question a while ago about 127.0.0.1 and how it is handled... is it normal that in the guest I cannot see a lo interface and pinging 127.0.0.1 does nothing? 1220812356 M * Bertl depends on your kernel version and guest setup 1220812362 M * vargadani i suppose if I can't ping it, daemons cannot bind themselves to that interface either 1220812373 M * daniel_hozac ping has absolutely nothing to do with bind. 1220812376 M * vargadani 2.6.22.19-vs2.2.0.7 1220812388 M * Bertl daemons do not bind to interfaces, and ping is below the ip layer 1220812417 M * vargadani alright... 1220812427 M * Bertl vargadani: try 'ping localhost' 1220812437 M * Bertl if you setup is correct, that should work 1220812442 M * vargadani which works perfect 1220812475 M * vargadani so if I let's say have amavisd that binds itself to 127.0.0.1 should work, right? 1220812683 M * Bertl to _localhost_ yes 1220812705 M * vargadani yeah...well they have that silly IP address in the config file... 1220812711 M * Bertl binding to 127.0.0.1 is a bug in the daemon, but works fine for binding 1220812715 M * vargadani I think that messes things up a bit 1220812732 M * Bertl it might not work for access/security checks hardcoded to 127.0.0.1 1220812748 M * Bertl (unless you use vs2.3.x) 1220812762 M * vargadani the fact is that I used to be able to install Zimbra in vserver with no trouble at all but now I can't 1220812769 M * vargadani I used the very same vserver version 1220812781 M * vargadani so the only difference must be in zimbra... 1220812827 M * Bertl you can try with a vs2.3.x version, that gives the guest apps a perfect illusion of 127.0.0.1 1220812911 M * vargadani it is not stable yet, so I don't risk unless you say, that it is perfectly safe 1220812924 M * vargadani or at least as safe as the stable 1220812989 M * Bertl hehe, no, it's not as well tested .. but that was just a suggestion to test this theory with Zimbra 1220813003 M * Bertl i.e. to find out _if_ it is 127.0.0.1 related 1220813125 M * vargadani yeah... that makes sense 1220813146 M * vargadani if I weren't that lazy I would recompile my kernel right now :) 1220813188 Q * pisco_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220813866 J * pisco ~pisco@tor.noreply.org 1220815631 Q * ktwilight Quit: dead 1220815727 Q * yarihm Quit: Leaving 1220815988 J * ktwilight ~ktwilight@118.208-66-87.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be 1220816216 M * vargadani it is confirmed now that it not the system's fault that I cannot install zimbra properly... nor is it zimbra's fault... 1220816228 M * vargadani it's vmware that screws things up 1220816242 M * vargadani i am relieved 1220816476 J * ntrs ~ntrs@77.29.195.8 1220816518 Q * vargadani Remote host closed the connection 1220818052 J * vargadani ~vargadani@catv-89-135-16-217.catv.broadband.hu 1220818584 Q * NaioN Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220819076 J * NaioN ~stefan@misc.mordor.unilogicnetworks.net 1220819640 J * ktwilight_ ~ktwilight@27.95-66-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be 1220819745 Q * bonbons Quit: Leaving 1220819862 Q * ktwilight Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220820769 Q * blues charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * mcp charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * cehteh charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * duckx charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * quote charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * padde charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * mEDI_S charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * morrigan charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * C14r charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * snooze charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * DoberMann charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * Bertl charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * eyck charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * bXi charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * fosco_ charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * SpComb charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * franck34 charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * cohan charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * pmjdebruijn charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * Adrinael charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * zbyniu charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * weasel charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 Q * m_o_d charon.oftc.net kinetic.oftc.net 1220820769 J * C14r ~C14r@h58173.serverkompetenz.net 1220820769 J * bXi bluepunk@irssi.co.uk 1220820769 J * zbyniu ~zbyniu@host13-188.crowley.pl 1220820769 J * morrigan morrigan@IRC.13thfloor.at 1220820769 J * SpComb terom@zapotek.paivola.fi 1220820770 J * blues blues@ada117.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl 1220820771 J * franck34 franck34@sd-10138.dedibox.fr 1220820771 J * Adrinael adrinael@rid7.kyla.fi 1220820771 J * fosco fosco@212.85.148.86 1220820771 J * pmjdebruijn pascal@jester.pcode.nl 1220820771 J * weasel_ weasel@weasel.chair.oftc.net 1220820771 J * eyck 2aiolpjl@nat03.nowanet.pl 1220820771 J * snooze ~o@1-1-4-40a.gkp.gbg.bostream.se 1220820771 J * padde ~padde@patrick-nagel.net 1220820773 J * cohan ~cohan@koniczek.de 1220820777 J * duckx ~Duck@81.57.39.234 1220820779 N * weasel_ weasel 1220820779 J * m_o_d ~m_o_d@host-80.54.30.252.ltv.pl 1220820780 J * DoberMann ~james@cap31-6-88-180-72-76.fbx.proxad.net 1220820784 J * cehteh ~ct@pipapo.org 1220820813 J * mcp ~mcp@wolk-project.de 1220820828 J * mEDI_S ~medi@snipah.com 1220820900 J * androsch ~androsch@dslb-084-060-229-064.pools.arcor-ip.net 1220820945 N * DoberMann DoberMann[ZZZzzz] 1220821052 J * Bertl herbert@IRC.13thfloor.at 1220821069 J * Bertl_ herbert@IRC.13thfloor.at 1220821200 Q * ktwilight_ Quit: dead 1220821228 Q * Bertl_ 1220821424 Q * vargadani Remote host closed the connection 1220821924 Q * loddafnir Remote host closed the connection 1220822054 J * ktwilight ~ktwilight@27.95-66-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be 1220822066 J * ViRUS ~mp@p579B5386.dip.t-dialin.net 1220822111 J * Walex ~Walex@82-69-39-138.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 1220822267 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@p5B23F987.dip.t-dialin.net 1220823032 J * Aiken ~Aiken@ppp118-208-124-125.lns4.bne4.internode.on.net 1220823342 Q * ntrs Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220824328 J * Mojo1978 ~Mojo1978@ip-88-152-60-134.hsi.ish.de 1220824435 J * Frechemaus ~Frechemau@f049233246.adsl.alicedsl.de 1220824870 J * doener_ ~doener@i577B947D.versanet.de 1220824974 Q * doener Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220827651 Q * Walex Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220827807 Q * ViRUS Quit: If there is Artificial Intelligence, then there's bound to be some artificial stupidity. (Thomas Edison) 1220827984 Q * Frechemaus 1220828054 J * orzel ~orzel@freehackers.org 1220828134 M * orzel hello. I've been using vserver for several years and it's workign fine. For some days, processes keep on crashing inside the vm. 1220828166 M * orzel i've traced down the problem to this : i've added a ulimit in /etc/profile to limit the memory for my users. It seems this limit apply to processes in vserver, i dont know why 1220828180 M * orzel have you ever had this pb ? 1220828214 M * Bertl well, it really depends on your setup and kernel version 1220828266 M * Bertl but yes, host side ulimits can affect guests (on older kernels, without user spaces) 1220828274 M * orzel i use gentoo and my own kernel compiled from sources found on vserver.org : 2.6.22.2-vs2.2.0.3 1220828310 M * orzel to restart i do "vserver host restart" and i guess some bash script is used somewhere and read /etc/profile 1220828334 M * orzel i could ask a 'ulimit -v unlimited' in it if i knew which one is it, do you know ? 1220828342 M * Bertl vserver host? host is your name for the guest? 1220828350 M * orzel was an example 1220828369 M * orzel 'myclient' if you prefer, or 'myguest' 1220828380 M * Bertl so you have limits for root on the host? 1220828430 M * Bertl ulimit -Ha and ulimit -Sa will show you the limits 1220828459 M * daniel_hozac just set explicit limits in /etc/vservers//ulimits and they will be honored. 1220828462 Q * Mojo1978 Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220828556 M * orzel daniel_hozac: what is the format of this file ? 1220828823 M * Bertl http://www.nongnu.org/util-vserver/doc/conf/configuration.html 1220828900 M * orzel ok the problem is now fixed, and the vserver processes are not limited, while those from people connecting through ssh are. which is great. 1220828903 M * orzel thanks for your help! 1220828913 M * Bertl you're welcome! 1220828952 M * orzel btw, i'm looking forward to two things : ipv6 support, and support for linux kernel 2.6.26 or 27 1220828966 M * Bertl it's already there :) 1220828980 M * orzel not on the main page 1220828995 M * orzel i mean, of course, 'production ready' :) 1220829007 M * Bertl well, Experimental for now 1220829044 M * orzel your naming scheme is strange. vs2.2.0.3 can apply to kernel 2.6.19.7 and 2.6.22.2 too ? 1220829051 M * cehteh hehe .. vserver is one of these projects, anyone uses in production but almost noone tests :) 1220829066 M * orzel cehteh: you frighten me! 1220829073 M * Bertl orzel: vs2.2.x means second stable branch 1220829084 M * Bertl orzel: that can apply to a number of kernels 1220829103 M * Bertl (similar for vs2.3.x which is the devel branch) 1220829104 M * cehteh orzel: i meant anyone has production server with it .. but if asked to test it .. "Huh .. no server for that" ;) 1220829109 M * cehteh at least happens to me 1220829131 M * orzel mm, how dangerous is the use of 2.3 ? 1220829144 M * Bertl not really 1220829163 M * cehteh iirc lot people use it for production 1220829194 M * orzel There's also, imha, a huge psychological point : your main page is reassuring, it looks great, while the 'experimental' stuff is a dir listing. I did ^W as soon as I've seen that 1220829228 M * cehteh dir listings are pure information at the fingertips 1220829231 M * Bertl well, stable is well tested, that's the point 1220829242 M * cehteh do you want a marketing department for the experimental patches? :) 1220829248 M * orzel just do a great wiki page as good-looking as the production version table stuff, so people know where to go / what to use/ 1220829258 M * orzel cehteh: a wiki page will be enough :) 1220829267 M * cehteh its a wiki .. make one 1220829274 M * Bertl orzel: feel free to create wiki pages around my upload dir 1220829307 M * orzel i dont know what to put in it... that's precisely what i would find such a page useful 1220829312 M * orzel for 1220829349 M * Bertl well, if you do not know what to write on such a page, what do you expect from that page? 1220829371 M * orzel i would expect the information i'm looking for : what to use/test 1220829379 M * orzel i dont know this, so i can't write the page, can I? 1220829436 M * Bertl ah, well, it's quite simple: if you want stable, use the stable branch, if you want new features, use the development branch, if you want bleeding edge stuff, go for Experimental 1220829456 M * orzel argh. there are three branches ? see.. i thought there was two 1220829462 M * orzel were 1220829477 M * Bertl of course, if you want to do testing, then Experimental is where you should be 1220829496 M * orzel 2.3 is 'deve branch' ? 1220829524 M * Bertl yes, and vs2.3.x are devel releases 1220829541 M * orzel ok, and which ones are experimental ? 1220829558 M * Bertl note that the experimental branch has no separate numbering, it just has another extension 1220829568 M * orzel ah, ok 1220829570 M * Bertl i.e. vs2.3.0.35 is experimental (strictly speaking) 1220829576 M * orzel ok, i understand 1220829590 M * Bertl but that is actually quite stable and we will probably promote it soon 1220829598 M * Bertl (to development) 1220829601 Q * balbir_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220829618 M * orzel so there's no 'dev' for 2.6.26/27 kernel and/or ipv6 yet. But only experimental ones 1220829627 M * Bertl which will eventually become the next stable (vs2.4) 1220829637 M * orzel i understand the flow :) 1220829645 M * Bertl for ipv6 there are devel branches for older kernels 1220829655 M * orzel ok 1220829668 M * Bertl for 2.6.26 (which is quite experimental too :) there are only experimental releases for now 1220829712 Q * SlackLnx Quit: I'll Be back 1220829770 M * orzel ok. So my best bet would be to use patch-2.6.26.3-vs2.3.0.35.5.diff , knowing that it's almost considered stable enough to be promoted to 'dev' soon. 1220829797 M * Bertl yep, that gives you 2.6.26 and ipv6 1220829808 M * Bertl (and a bunch of other new features) 1220829823 M * orzel ok, i might do just that :) 1220830180 J * zbyniu_ ~zbyniu@host13-188.crowley.pl 1220830190 Q * zbyniu Read error: Connection reset by peer