1220400041 M * Bertl so everything fine, yes? 1220400049 M * oliwel setting the namespace-cleanup-skip seems not to change anything 1220400054 M * oliwel I hope so... 1220400077 M * oliwel now it would be interessting to see where the oopses come from 1220400088 M * Bertl from aufs, as we saw 1220400098 M * oliwel yep sure - but why 1220400105 M * oliwel I assume some counters are screwed 1220400118 M * oliwel perhaps by removing the mounts by vserver 1220400145 M * Bertl well, if the aufs developers don't want to look into it, because they think Linux-VServer plays evil tricks on them 1220400156 Q * dowdle Remote host closed the connection 1220400167 M * Bertl I would suggest playing a little with namespaces and --bind mounts 1220400171 M * oliwel i will send the oops to the list 1220400176 M * oliwel lets see what happens 1220400182 M * Bertl I'm sure daniel_hozac can give you some hints there 1220400197 M * oliwel ergh - setting namespace-cleanup-skip leaves the mount in the hosts mounts... 1220400201 M * oliwel ok 1220400222 M * oliwel oh no - forget it 1220400224 M * Bertl and I'm pretty positive that you can trigger it without Linux-VServer too 1220400229 M * oliwel its to late... 1220400249 M * oliwel As I have to identical boxes I can play around a bit 1220400258 M * oliwel but now I have to finish my mailsystem migration 1220400272 M * oliwel otherwise I will have angy customers in the morning ;) 1220400275 M * Bertl go ahead .. have fun :) 1220400297 M * oliwel thx - should be asleep since an hour :( 1220400971 Q * FireEgl Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220401010 M * oliwel Bertl Is there a counterpart to initialize ? 1220401037 M * oliwel I cant take down the drbd from the postpost script as the mount count is not zero 1220401120 M * daniel_hozac at the moment, no. 1220401818 J * FireEgl FireEgl@173.16.9.10 1220402477 M * Bertl okay, off to bed now .. have a good one everyone! cya! 1220402481 N * Bertl Bertl_zZ 1220403966 J * puck ~puck@leibniz.catalyst.net.nz 1220404135 M * puck Is anyone using cupsd in a vserver okay? I keep on getting unauthorized request for even though I have Allow from all set. 1220404243 P * mountie LUNCK! 1220404471 Q * oliwel Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.83 [Firefox 3.0.1/2008070206] 1220407318 Q * FireEgl Quit: Leaving... 1220411501 M * puck Hmph, I've found the problem and fixed it 1220411704 M * MooingLemur was it a localhost issue? 1220411718 M * MooingLemur I haven't tried it on a vserver yet :P 1220411729 M * MooingLemur errr.. loopback address issue 1220412525 M * puck Nope, it turns out I had the ACL Order round the wrong way for Limit All. 1220412532 M * puck So everything was denied by default. 1220412542 M * puck You wouldn't believe how long I've been trying to make this work! 1220412571 M * puck But initially I think I had loopback issues which would be why I changed that order. 1220413072 Q * derjohn_foo Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220413470 M * MooingLemur gotta love those hours and hours working on a one line fix 1220415470 M * puck Yup, damnit. 1220415481 M * puck And it was on my own box, not works. :( 1220415950 J * FireEgl FireEgl@173.16.9.10 1220418132 J * sharkjaw ~gab@149-67-194.231210.adsl.tele2.no 1220421219 Q * FireEgl Quit: Leaving... 1220421402 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@e180216168.adsl.alicedsl.de 1220421594 Q * matti Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220422167 J * FireEgl FireEgl@173.16.9.10 1220422198 N * pmenier_off pmenier 1220424349 J * chigital ~chigital@91.90.144.102 1220424998 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl 1220425002 M * Bertl morning folks! 1220425253 Q * chigital Quit: Leaving 1220425259 J * chigital ~chigital@91.90.144.102 1220425509 M * hijacker morning Bertl 1220425677 N * DoberMann[ZZZzzz] DoberMann 1220426094 J * ktwilight_ ~ktwilight@87.66.202.68 1220426216 Q * balbir_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220426384 Q * ktwilight Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220426577 Q * ktwilight_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220426884 J * balbir_ ~balbir@122.166.145.2 1220427922 J * dna ~dna@p54BCF54A.dip.t-dialin.net 1220430470 Q * larsivi Quit: Konversation terminated! 1220431049 Q * derjohn_mob Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220433693 J * larsivi ~larsivi@85.221.53.194 1220433872 J * loddafnir ~mike@chello080108111137.5.11.univie.teleweb.at 1220434055 Q * larsivi Quit: Konversation terminated! 1220434125 J * larsivi ~larsivi@85.221.53.194 1220435478 Q * dna Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220435502 J * dna ~dna@p54BCF54A.dip.t-dialin.net 1220435975 J * dna_ ~dna@p54BCD290.dip.t-dialin.net 1220436163 Q * dna Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220436612 Q * dna_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220437056 J * dna ~dna@p54BCD290.dip.t-dialin.net 1220437268 Q * larsivi Remote host closed the connection 1220437402 J * lilalinux ~plasma@80.69.41.3 1220437587 J * larsivi ~larsivi@85.221.53.194 1220437663 Q * dna Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220437679 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@80.69.42.51 1220438154 J * dna ~dna@p54BCD290.dip.t-dialin.net 1220441125 M * Bertl nap attack ... bbl 1220441130 N * Bertl Bertl_zZ 1220442182 J * after ~lcool@203.211.96.35 1220442246 M * after hi there 1220442248 M * after im trying to create a guest in a centos5, i have installed everything using yum.. but i got an error msg "Funciton not implemented". how can i fix this? 1220442352 M * daniel_hozac are you running a Linux-VServer kernel? 1220442402 M * after i just followed the steps from http://linux-vserver.org/Installation_on_CentOS 1220442447 M * after oh, never mind.. found my mistake 1220442457 M * daniel_hozac so uname -a shows something like 2.6.22.19-vs2.3.0.34.1? 1220443096 J * dna_ ~dna@p54BCF571.dip.t-dialin.net 1220443118 M * after how can i setup the maximum cpu usage for a guest? 1220443457 Q * dna Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220443494 Q * after Quit: Leaving 1220444380 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl 1220444385 M * Bertl back now .. 1220444678 Q * pisco Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220445069 J * pisco_ ~pisco@tor.noreply.org 1220445786 Q * pisco_ Remote host closed the connection 1220446963 J * pisco_ ~pisco@tor.noreply.org 1220447197 J * det ~chatzilla@bb116-14-15-180.singnet.com.sg 1220447204 M * det hello 1220447269 Q * det 1220447335 J * nas ~chatzilla@bb116-14-15-180.singnet.com.sg 1220447343 M * nas hello people 1220447346 M * nas hi bertl 1220447352 M * nas ard 1220447393 M * nas i found this link 1220447395 M * nas http://newrice.blogspot.com/2008/05/lvs-and-ha-on-debian-etch.html 1220447426 M * nas anyone of you who knows how to change sysctl of a vserver guest? 1220447439 M * nas i'm using kernel version 2.6.22 1220447615 Q * sharkjaw Remote host closed the connection 1220447628 M * Bertl what sysctl? 1220447669 M * nas the /etc/sysctl file 1220447679 M * nas this file contains networking stuff 1220447707 M * nas now i decided to put the director in the host 1220447712 M * Bertl well, you can change the /etc/sysctl file anytime on host or guest 1220447723 M * nas but then i still have to put the real server in a vserver 1220447732 M * Bertl (it is just a file, no special meaning) 1220447737 M * nas i cannot change on the guest 1220447742 M * nas i get permission denied 1220447748 M * nas i can change in the host 1220447765 M * nas but when i change in host it is reflected in the guest 1220447771 M * Bertl you get permission denied on that file? 1220447784 M * nas permission denied when i change 1220447810 M * nas i used this cmd: sysctl -w 1220447834 M * Bertl ah, well, that might fail, depending on the property and kernel version 1220447859 M * nas but this cmd is ok when i execute in the host 1220447884 M * nas i don't know how to override the values inside the vserver 1220447890 M * nas there must be a way 1220447893 M * nas but ahhh 1220447918 M * nas have you seen the linke 1220447921 M * nas ? 1220447935 M * nas it is exactly the platform i will be using 1220447945 M * nas except i put my real server inside a vserver 1220447951 M * nas or i use vserver rather 1220447961 M * nas which makes things a bit more complex 1220448029 M * Bertl first, what property do you want to set 1220448082 M * nas net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore 1220448114 M * nas and three more properties 1220448128 M * Bertl that one makes only sense to set it on the host 1220448132 M * nas need to make the real server hide ARP 1220448157 M * Bertl in Linux-VServer networking is completely left on the host 1220448168 M * nas so it treat virtual ip as local 1220448180 M * Bertl yep, the guests are isolated and restricted to certain host IPs 1220448196 M * Bertl i.e. there is no forwarding, bridging or similar involved 1220448220 M * Bertl and of course no layer 2 stuff like arp 1220448251 M * nas but there must be a way to combine director and real server in 1 physical server right? 1220448307 M * nas have you tried posting in debian forum? 1220448320 M * nas does it really take a while to get answers? 1220448339 M * nas someone somewhere must have done this kind of setup 1220448342 M * Bertl na, why should I post in debian forums? 1220448354 M * nas ahaaha 1220448364 M * nas of course you have the answers 1220448366 M * nas ahahah 1220448379 M * nas which OS you using? 1220448396 M * nas you guys always log on here? 1220448406 M * Bertl Linux, but let's take one step back and describe what you are actually trying to do, yes? 1220448435 M * nas ok 1220448484 M * nas if you take a look on this link 1220448486 M * nas http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=30468&highlight= 1220448492 M * nas i describe it there 1220448562 M * nas only this time, there is only one vserver on each physical server because i already put the load balancer in the host 1220448563 M * Bertl okay, I've seen that yesterday (maybe on the ML?) 1220448584 M * Bertl okay, so you are using lvs or what? 1220448608 M * nas ldirectord-2 and heartbeat-2 and ipvs 1220448632 M * nas i guess lvs is what you call the whole thing 1220448636 M * nas so yes i use lvs 1220448660 M * Bertl okay, and what does the HA setup do when e.g. Box A goes down? 1220448690 M * Bertl (i.e. what actions are taken) 1220448733 M * nas the load balancer on Box B takes over. then since Box A is down only real server in Box B is a candidate web server 1220448737 M * Bertl but actually we are back to your implementation, and not what you want to achieve :) 1220448764 M * Bertl what is the purpose of the load balancer? 1220448794 M * nas the load balancer balances the http requests to the two real http servers 1220448806 M * nas which are on vservers 1220448807 M * Bertl when both are running, that is, no? 1220448875 M * nas if one real http server goes down then it will be disqualified from the pool 1220448881 M * Bertl do you have that many requests that you need them to be balanced between two hosts? 1220448888 M * nas yeah 1220448908 M * nas i need to run two hosts concurrently 1220448909 M * Bertl okay, so the setup will be severely degraded when one host fails, yes? 1220448971 M * nas i'm not sure about that though, but at least that is where the HA takes place 1220449031 M * Bertl well, there are many different forms of HA, the balancing is one (to cope with high loads) the failover is another (to cope with boxes going down) 1220449045 M * nas yeah right 1220449063 M * Bertl so, the question is, what parts are important to your setup 1220449097 M * nas htttp request load balancing and the failover in the load balancer 1220449128 M * Bertl okay, so both hosts have a balancer running, only one is active at a given time 1220449135 M * nas yeah right 1220449145 M * Bertl they use a 'shared' ip for the balancer, so that it is reachable 1220449157 M * nas virtual IP 1220449173 M * Bertl heartbeat does the switch and the necessary arp stuff 1220449178 M * nas yeah 1220449198 M * nas the ldirector and ipvs does some of the arp stuff 1220449198 M * Bertl okay, so each load balancer redirects to two IPs 1220449204 M * Bertl (the guests) 1220449213 M * nas heartbeat is plainly for failover 1220449227 M * Bertl one IP is always host local, the other IP is remote 1220449248 M * nas yeah load balancer redirects to two IPs which are the real servers 1220449248 M * Bertl (that should be fairly trivial for the balancer) 1220449270 M * Bertl no need to change anything for the guest there 1220449301 M * nas the guest need to treat the VIP as local that is 1220449307 M * Bertl what you might want though is a separate physical interface for the balanced zone 1220449333 M * Bertl when the host treats the IP as local, the guest will do so too 1220449368 M * nas and how about the arp_hide of the guest? 1220449382 M * nas so that it doesn't broadcast it's IP 1220449397 M * nas and only the virtual IP is know to the outside world 1220449423 M * Bertl if you want to avoid that the _host_ is broadcasting any of the IPs assigned, you need to configure it on the host 1220449437 M * Bertl the _guest_ will never broadcast any arp or so 1220449463 M * Bertl all the guest will produce is udp/tcp and a minimal subset of icmp 1220449485 M * nas oh i think i understand what you mean 1220449494 M * nas i'll try it again 1220449499 M * nas maybe i miss something 1220449519 M * Bertl the best way to look at it is by forgetting about Linux-VServer 1220449521 M * nas coz i already tried it today, i was not able to make it work 1220449540 M * Bertl i.e. assume that the apache is running on the host (for the balancing setup) 1220449556 M * Bertl (you can actually use an apache on the host to test) 1220449575 M * Bertl once that works with the balancer, you can simply replace the host apache with the guest one 1220449582 M * nas to test whether or not the director is already working? 1220449598 M * Bertl yep, don't assume that guests are _separate_ entities 1220449611 M * Bertl (from the load balancer PoV) 1220449631 M * Bertl i.e. reduce your setup to the following: 1220449654 M * Bertl - two hosts, A and B, each running a load balancer and an httpd 1220449676 M * Bertl - the balancer uses a separate IP for reaching the httpd 1220449693 M * Bertl - HA assigns and maintains the VIP for both hosts 1220449721 M * Bertl you could actually remove the Linux-VServer patched kernel for this testing/setup, it shouldn'T matter 1220449744 M * nas ok... 1220449748 M * Bertl once that works as expected, add back the Linux-VServer part 1220449752 M * nas thanks so much 1220449759 M * Bertl move the apache into the guests 1220449771 M * Bertl and assign the httpd addresses to the guests (not the VIP) 1220449788 M * nas yeah ok 1220449822 M * Bertl if you encounter any issues during this "switch", then this is the place to ask :) 1220449835 M * nas ahahha 1220449836 M * nas ok 1220449841 M * nas i'll try this 1220449846 M * nas thanks a lot 1220449851 M * Bertl you're welcome! 1220449941 Q * larsivi Quit: Konversation terminated! 1220450078 M * nas i'm logging off now, it's quite late here. xie xie!!! 1220450111 Q * nas Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.83 [Firefox 3.0.1/2008070208] 1220450232 Q * Aiken Remote host closed the connection 1220450358 M * Bertl seems I'm going to learn mandarin now :) 1220450389 J * pisco__ ~pisco@tor.noreply.org 1220450471 Q * pisco_ Remote host closed the connection 1220450823 J * geb ~geb@168.158.97-84.rev.gaoland.net 1220450846 M * geb hi 1220451159 J * nas ~chatzilla@bb116-14-15-180.singnet.com.sg 1220451213 M * nas people what is the difference between eth0:0 and eth1 1220451236 M * nas suppose i have eth0 set then i want to set another IP that is 1220451254 M * nas should i use eth0:0 or eth1 1220451418 M * fb nas: you should use ip from iproute and add secondary address to eth0 1220451496 M * Bertl you can use eth0:0 or eth0, you won't be able to use eth1, unless you have two physical network cards 1220451514 M * nas ohhhh ok 1220451516 J * dowdle ~dowdle@scott.coe.montana.edu 1220451520 M * nas ahahaha 1220451531 M * nas i thought it's just naming. so it matters 1220451535 M * nas thanks guys 1220451616 A * ard always uses lo 1220451633 M * ard since putting things on an interface can give you primary/secondary address headaches 1220451704 M * nas so putting the virtual IP on lo also can? 1220451891 M * nas so i need to use iproute and not just add the entries for example in /etc/network/interfaces if i want a secondary address to eth0? 1220452080 M * Bertl ard: well, putting a public ip on lo is a little weird :) 1220452247 M * ard nope :-) 1220452265 M * ard it's not weird, it's common practice ;-) 1220452279 M * ard even on cisco's it's normal ;-) 1220452353 M * ard You just need to differentiate between what's a service/vserver, and what's needed for routing ;-) 1220452375 A * ard has something stuck in his eye, therefore the ;-) 1220452474 M * ard nas: mkdir -P /etc/vserver//extraif;cd /etc/vserver//extraif; echo ip > ip;echo 32 > prefix;echo lo > dev 1220452548 M * ard extraif is of course just a label, I usually use 0...10 f.i. 1220452549 M * daniel_hozac /etc/vservers//interfaces ;) 1220452580 M * ard Hmmmm.... my thinking was again faster than my typing ;-) 1220452597 A * ard needs another ManMachineInterface 1220452642 Q * chigital Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220452690 M * nas yeah i know this file, for changing IP of vserver right? 1220452698 M * nas what else can this file do? 1220452895 M * nas ahahah 1220452903 M * nas i think i typed the wrong question 1220453050 M * Bertl try again :) 1220453516 Q * pisco__ Remote host closed the connection 1220453615 J * pisco_ ~pisco@tor.noreply.org 1220453996 M * nas hey guys VRRP or heartbeat? 1220454377 M * nas tomorrow again. thanks very much to you all :) 1220454387 Q * nas Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.83 [Firefox 3.0.1/2008070208] 1220454451 M * ard nas : keepalived with vrrp-only mode 1220454635 J * ktwilight ~ktwilight@87.66.207.116 1220455674 Q * tokkee Remote host closed the connection 1220458111 J * docelic ~docelic@78.134.194.240 1220459157 N * DoberMann DoberMann[PullA] 1220459402 J * F8007 ~sa@249-167-124-91.pool.ukrtel.net 1220459410 P * F8007 1220461151 N * pmenier pmenier_off 1220462664 Q * lilalinux Remote host closed the connection 1220463351 J * duckx ~Duck@81.57.39.234 1220463728 Q * geb Quit: Quitte 1220464562 Q * derjohn_mob Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220465207 N * DoberMann[PullA] DoberMann 1220466254 M * karasz is http://vserver.13thfloor.at dead? 1220466279 M * daniel_hozac WORKSFORME. 1220466300 M * karasz ok. 1220466348 M * Bertl yep, works fine here too 1220466461 M * karasz seems to be an issue of my provider :-/ 1220466673 M * Bertl blocking certain hosts? 1220466708 M * daniel_hozac must be china :-) 1220466733 M * Bertl nah, they _allow_ certain hosts, that's a big difference :) 1220469006 J * mrfree ~mrfree@host165-181-dynamic.26-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it 1220469045 Q * phedny Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220469165 J * Thorsten ~Thorsten@dslb-084-058-134-212.pools.arcor-ip.net 1220469418 J * phedny ~mark@2001:610:656::115 1220469498 M * Thorsten Hi *, what is the recommended kernel for Linux Vserver currently? The website mentions 2.6.22.19, but I'm wondering if there isn't any support for newer kernels? 1220469554 M * Bertl there is support, but no _stable_ patch 1220469566 M * Bertl http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/ 1220469599 M * Thorsten OK, so development has not stopped or anything like that? 1220469609 M * Bertl nope 1220469612 M * Thorsten cool :-) 1220470623 Q * loddafnir Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220471857 Q * mrfree Quit: Leaving 1220472708 Q * docelic Quit: http://www.spinlocksolutions.com/ 1220473122 Q * AlanCox Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220473168 J * Walex ~Walex@82-69-39-138.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 1220473337 J * hparker ~hparker@linux.homershut.net 1220473512 J * larsivi ~larsivi@169.80-202-217.nextgentel.com 1220475438 J * oliwel ~chatzilla@ppp-88-217-6-12.dynamic.mnet-online.de 1220475552 M * oliwel Hello Guys 1220475569 M * oliwel I am having still troules woth my aufs setup and stuck with an urgent problem right now 1220475592 M * oliwel A guest was not cleanly shutdown and I now have a zombie context left 1220475624 M * oliwel vserver-stat 1220475625 M * oliwel CTX PROC VSZ RSS userTIME sysTIME UPTIME NAME 1220475627 M * oliwel 67 37 0.9G 339.3M 0m21s23 0m07s79 17m33s45 mx 1220475628 M * oliwel 199 0 728K 0 0m00s70 0m01s11 17m42s96 1220475640 M * oliwel Is there any chance to get rid of it ? 1220475767 J * Aiken ~Aiken@ppp118-208-124-125.lns4.bne4.internode.on.net 1220475839 M * oliwel hm, too early for the guys... 1220475842 M * daniel_hozac did you make it persistent? 1220475936 N * _Radiance Radiance 1220476191 M * oliwel not inteninally 1220476246 N * DoberMann DoberMann[ZZZzzz] 1220476252 M * Bertl oliwel: what kernel version? 1220476303 M * oliwel 2.6.22.19-vs2.2.0.7 1220476331 M * Bertl what does 'not cleanly shutdown' mean? 1220476432 M * oliwel some of the processs sid not terminate within the timeout 1220476439 M * oliwel so they were killed 1220476452 M * oliwel and I gut again a kernel oops from the aufs stuff 1220476463 M * Bertl ah, well, that explains it then 1220476484 M * Bertl use a different context id for now or reboot the system 1220476524 M * Bertl most likely you have a zombie process keeping that context alive 1220476550 M * oliwel I cant see any with vps and it even shows 0 proces in the stats 1220476576 M * oliwel but ok - I already used another context and I have to reboot to get rid of the aufs oops anyway 1220476701 M * Bertl so I take it, you have an updated version of aufs which fixes the issues? 1220476710 M * oliwel and it seems that the aufs oopses are a result of leftover process 1220476715 M * oliwel no 1220476727 M * oliwel I again have oopses 1220476763 M * oliwel there is one hint from the aufs developer left with a mount option, but I didnt try 1220476766 M * oliwel yet 1220476776 M * Bertl hmm, what did you mean with 'I have to reboot to get rid of the aufs oops anyway' then? 1220476809 M * oliwel I get an ooops and the immediate consequences are fixed but its advides to reboot 1220476811 Q * Walex Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220476856 M * Bertl i.c. well, keep us updated on the issue 1220476858 M * daniel_hozac that sounds more like a recursive failure. 1220476871 M * daniel_hozac i.e. do_exit crashes too. 1220476919 M * oliwel sure I will 1220476937 M * oliwel I hope i quickly get a solution on this 1220476953 M * Bertl daniel_hozac: do you see a trace I don't? 1220476963 M * oliwel I can post if you want 1220476997 M * Bertl yes, please, go ahead 1220477002 M * daniel_hozac Bertl: that's the only time you get the "please reboot" message. 1220477062 M * oliwel http://paste.linux-vserver.org/12419 1220477156 J * derjohn_mob ~aj@e180216168.adsl.alicedsl.de 1220477171 M * Bertl ah, AuDebugOn() is actually AuBugOn()? 1220477218 M * oliwel ?? 1220477237 M * Bertl looks to me like the developer got the name wrong here 1220477256 M * Bertl but that's details, just makes it harder to understand the code 1220477322 Q * larsivi Quit: Konversation terminated! 1220477352 M * oliwel #define AuDebugOn(a) BUG_ON(!!(a)) 1220477375 M * oliwel its inside a ifdef so it can be replaced with a nop 1220477390 M * Bertl yeah, but Debug != Bug :) 1220477410 M * oliwel debug++ = bug-- 1220477412 M * oliwel =) 1220477424 Q * dna_ Quit: Verlassend 1220477426 M * Bertl btw, the !!(a) is funny too 1220477447 M * Bertl anyway, try to make that two different BUG_ON() statements 1220477467 M * Bertl one checking for sbinfo, the other one for the list 1220477496 M * Bertl my guess would be that the list is not empty 1220477522 M * oliwel ok I will but we cant test it now as it requires a reboot and currently the node is live... 1220477541 M * oliwel Yep same guess - from the leftover process 1220477547 M * Bertl you might then check (in the aufs code) where this list is manipulated 1220477605 M * Bertl I presume that the namespaces are not accounted properly in the aufs code, and thus some 'leftovers' remain 1220477634 M * Bertl (but that's more hand waving than anything ... I haven't even looked at the code yet) 1220477641 M * oliwel Might this have something to do with the cleanups ? 1220477655 M * Bertl they might trigger this 1220477672 M * Bertl but note: neither namespaces nor the cleanup are Linux-VServer specific 1220477690 M * Bertl i.e. you can do that with a vanilla kernel too :) 1220477760 M * oliwel So, I ll first give my bed a chance to see me some more hours than last night 1220477773 M * oliwel I hope the system remains stable till tommorrow ;) 1220477777 M * Bertl okay, I'm off to bed as well ... kinda tired ... 1220477777 M * oliwel gn8 1220477787 M * Bertl have a good one everyone! cya! 1220477792 N * Bertl Bertl_zZ 1220478150 T * * http://linux-vserver.org/ |stable 2.2.0.7, devel 2.3.0.34, grsec 2.2.0.7|util-vserver-0.30.215|libvserver-1.0.2|vserver-utils-1.0.3| He who asks a question is a fool for a minute; he who doesn't ask is a fool for a lifetime -- share the gained knowledge on the Wiki, and we forget about the minute. 1220478150 T * ChanServ - 1220478274 J * oliwel_ ~chatzilla@ppp-88-217-43-90.dynamic.mnet-online.de 1220478330 M * oliwel_ how can I increase the timeout on shutdown of a vserver ? 1220478607 Q * oliwel Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220478615 N * oliwel_ oliwel 1220478783 M * cehteh oliwel: there is a config setting for it ... look at the great flower page 1220478878 M * oliwel yes I saw it - sync-timeout ... 1220478885 M * oliwel not what I was really searhcing for 1220478920 M * cehteh you mean the time between the TERM and KILL signals right? 1220479034 M * cehteh sync-timeout is right then .. despite its misleading name 1220479042 A * cehteh just checked 1220479121 Q * Thorsten Quit: Leaving 1220479203 J * doener ~doener@i577BAE11.versanet.de 1220479308 Q * doener_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1220479375 J * Aiken_ ~Aiken@ppp118-208-124-125.lns4.bne4.internode.on.net 1220479381 Q * Aiken_ 1220479388 Q * Aiken Read error: Connection reset by peer 1220484224 Q * hparker Quit: Read error: 104 (Peer reset by connection) 1220484453 Q * xdr Remote host closed the connection 1220485512 J * xdr ~xdr@gote2.16.cust.blixtvik.net