1186618724 J * arcil ~arcil@p5B0765DB.dip.t-dialin.net
1186620402 P * junio 
1186621658 Q * arcil Quit: Leaving
1186622504 J * friendly12345 ~friendly@ppp121-44-229-67.lns2.mel4.internode.on.net
1186622839 J * arcil ~arcil@p5B0765DB.dip.t-dialin.net
1186623878 Q * arcil Remote host closed the connection
1186624804 Q * Johnnie Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186625369 J * Johnnie ~jdlewis@c-67-163-142-234.hsd1.ct.comcast.net
1186627261 J * kevinl_ ~kevinl@c-67-185-24-207.hsd1.wa.comcast.net
1186627337 M * kevinl_ lol @ topic .
1186627338 M * kevinl_ nice
1186627438 T * daniel_hozac http://linux-vserver.org/ | latest stable 2.2.0.3, 2.0.3-rc3, devel 2.3.0.15, stable+grsec 2.0.2.1, 2.2.0.3 | util-vserver-0.30.213 | libvserver-1.0.2 & vserver-utils-1.0.3 | He who asks a question is a fool for a minute; he who doesn't ask is a fool for a lifetime -- share the gained knowledge on the Wiki, and we'll forget about the minute ;)
1186627998 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186628433 Q * meandtheshell Quit: Leaving.
1186631937 Q * kevinl_ Remote host closed the connection
1186632744 Q * FireEgl Quit: Bye...
1186639418 N * DoberMann[ZZZzzz] DoberMann
1186640812 N * DoberMann DoberMann[PullA]
1186642107 J * dna ~dna@151-239-dsl.kielnet.net
1186642822 J * gerrit ~gerrit@12.149.158.88
1186643869 J * arachnist arachnist@088156185052.who.vectranet.pl
1186644009 J * wenchien ~wenchien@59-105-176-11.adsl.static.seed.net.tw
1186644140 J * FireEgl FireEgl@2001:5c0:84dc:1:4::
1186644171 M * nanonyme eh, wait a minute
1186644188 M * nanonyme is that a valid ip address? o.O
1186644241 M * nanonyme that is, FireEgl@2001:5c0:84dc:1:4::
1186644245 M * bXi yes
1186644247 M * bXi thats ipv6
1186644253 M * nanonyme i thought you had to have an ending
1186644257 M * nanonyme like 1 or something
1186644264 M * nanonyme that looks like a subnet
1186644283 M * bXi maybe he connects trough his routes ip or so
1186644347 M * nanonyme i don't think that should matter, really...
1186644362 M * nanonyme the router would be something like 2001:5c0:84dc:1:4::1
1186644433 M * nanonyme almost sure that's a vhost or a hostname
1186644474 M * bXi his hostnames on that ip are different
1186644643 M * nanonyme hmm, yes
1186644673 M * bXi when my kernel is done compiling i'll try it myself
1186644770 M * nanonyme hmm, apparently it is a legal address. at least according to a name server. interesting
1186644896 M * bXi 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0 IN PTR apparoat.nl.
1186644909 M * bXi you can use it indeed
1186645087 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186645789 J * aA ~aa@213.208.38.17
1186645844 M * nanonyme bXi: apparently you can in ipv4 too. it's just not very common and is not implemented in all ip stacks
1186646536 M * matti Morning :)
1186646683 M * nanonyme morning
1186646918 M * sid3windr errr
1186646922 M * sid3windr why wouldn't you be able to use it
1186646938 M * sid3windr it surely is implemented in all ip stacks I'd hope :|
1186646952 M * sid3windr let's say you have 192.168.0.0/23
1186646964 M * sid3windr then 192.168.0.255 and 192.168.1.0 are definitely valid
1186646969 M * nanonyme well, yeah
1186646973 M * nanonyme that's true
1186646988 M * sid3windr also, 'acording to a nameserver' doesn't say much
1186647001 M * sid3windr I can happily have my nameserver reverse 192.168.0.333
1186647002 M * sid3windr :p
1186647008 M * nanonyme :p
1186647019 M * nanonyme anyway, yeah, it is indeed valid. got it only now
1186647029 M * sid3windr hehe
1186647044 M * nanonyme or can be valid anyway. depends on the original subnet's size
1186647049 M * sid3windr indeed
1186647060 Q * emtty Read error: Connection reset by peer
1186647074 M * sid3windr but it is true that when cable providers use such large subnets that people getting the .0 sometimes get locked out of stuff
1186647090 M * sid3windr but I don't think it's because of the ip stacks
1186647101 M * sid3windr rather stupid programs "checking your ip address" saying it's not valid
1186647116 J * FireEgl FireEgl@2001:5c0:84dc:1:4::
1186647136 M * nanonyme a friend said it had to do with optimization in software side which said that .0 -> subnet
1186647147 M * nanonyme or sometimes has to do anyway
1186647193 M * nanonyme oh, well. first time i bumped into this. i haven't had to use this big subnets in ipv4
1186647295 M * sid3windr well, I never really used it
1186647311 M * sid3windr I have subnets larger than /24 but they're nicely sliced up into /27's and such ;)
1186647319 M * sid3windr on v6 i've used the :: though
1186647325 M * nanonyme yeah, me too
1186647334 M * nanonyme i've only used the first part of my subnet though
1186647378 M * nanonyme i don't really need that many addresses :)
1186647385 M * nanonyme 256 is plenty enough for me
1186647494 M * bXi i'm currently playing around with an ipv6 /48
1186647854 J * yarihm ~yarihm@whitehead2.nine.ch
1186648797 M * sid3windr segmented into /64's I presume
1186648894 M * nanonyme heh, i actually tried to first use my /48 as one big lump
1186648902 M * nanonyme i think i know better now...
1186649130 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186649396 J * bzed ~bzed@10-205-116-85.dsl.manitu.net
1186649607 Q * aA 
1186650167 J * FireEgl FireEgl@Sebastian.Tcldrop.US
1186650497 J * ktwilight_ ~ktwilight@9.120-66-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be
1186650525 Q * DoberMann[PullA] Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186650848 Q * ktwilight Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186650853 J * DoberMann[PullA] ~james@AToulouse-156-1-33-18.w81-49.abo.wanadoo.fr
1186650944 J * ktwilight ~ktwilight@192.216-66-87.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be
1186651281 Q * ktwilight Quit: dead
1186651299 J * ktwilight ~ktwilight@192.216-66-87.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be
1186651368 Q * ktwilight_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186651838 J * trrt ~sadf@222.253.79.135
1186651900 Q * ktwilight Remote host closed the connection
1186651984 J * dna_ ~dna@151-239-dsl.kielnet.net
1186651987 N * trrt _sell_cvv2_
1186652039 J * ktwilight ~ktwilight@192.216-66-87.adsl-static.isp.belgacom.be
1186652375 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186652393 Q * dna Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186652552 J * lilalinux ~plasma@dslb-084-058-208-235.pools.arcor-ip.net
1186653384 J * FireEgl FireEgl@Sebastian.Atlantica.US.TO
1186653746 Q * yarihm Quit: Leaving
1186653915 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186654264 Q * eSa| Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186654975 Q * _sell_cvv2_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186655188 J * FireEgl FireEgl@Sebastian.Tcldrop.Com
1186655508 Q * ||Cobra|| Remote host closed the connection
1186655674 J * esa bip@ip-87-238-2-45.adsl.cheapnet.it
1186655736 J * ||Cobra|| ~cob@pc-csa01.science.uva.nl
1186656245 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186656997 M * bXi daniel_hozac: you around?
1186657342 M * bXi what should i set to fix that kernel issue with my guests showing all my interfaces?
1186657691 J * _sell_cvv2_ ~sadf@222.253.79.135
1186659205 J * yarihm ~yarihm@whitehead2.nine.ch
1186659462 Q * balbir Read error: Connection reset by peer
1186659491 J * meandtheshell ~markus@85.127.103.151
1186660055 J * ftx ~gerrit@dslb-084-060-193-241.pools.arcor-ip.net
1186660984 Q * Baby Quit: KVIrc 3.2.0 'Realia'
1186661568 J * balbir ~balbir@122.167.74.45
1186662222 Q * _sell_cvv2_ 
1186663196 J * ema ~ema@fw.galliera.it
1186663922 J * DoberMann_ ~james@AToulouse-156-1-82-105.w86-196.abo.wanadoo.fr
1186664030 Q * DoberMann[PullA] Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186664367 Q * Aiken Quit: Leaving
1186664939 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186665759 Q * buzztracker Remote host closed the connection
1186665861 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186666664 Q * otaku42 Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186668474 M * daniel_hozac bXi: just don't assign the guest an IP on all of your interfaces? :)
1186668639 Q * cehteh Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186668787 P * friendly12345 
1186668862 M * bXi well like i said i didnt assign the sixxs interface to any guest
1186668973 M * bXi hmmm
1186668982 M * bXi it seems that a gentoo guest screws up with this
1186669081 M * daniel_hozac something has assigned that IP to your guest.
1186669106 J * aA ~aa@213.208.38.17
1186669129 M * bXi it seems like this guest is fubar
1186669148 M * bXi they all have localhost now?
1186669202 M * daniel_hozac yes, it's the loopback stuff.
1186669224 M * bXi http://bluepunk.pastebin.com/m9f1acbe
1186669269 M * bXi think i'll recreate that guest from start tho
1186669304 M * bXi it was a messy ruby install
1186669325 M * bXi my unreal tournament server works quite well in a guest
1186669450 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186670124 Q * arachnist Quit: bbl
1186671401 J * psithris ~psithris@88.218.32.55
1186671603 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186671871 Q * psithris Quit: using sirc version 2.211+KSIRC/1.3.12
1186673152 Q * aA 
1186673339 Q * AStorm Remote host closed the connection
1186674742 Q * yarihm Quit: Leaving
1186674968 Q * michal` Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186675075 J * michal` ~michal@www.rsbac.org
1186675192 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186675204 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186675658 J * bonbons ~bonbons@2001:960:7ab:0:20b:5dff:fec7:6b33
1186676010 M * bXi daniel_hozac: 
1186676017 M * bXi got some disturbing news for you
1186676017 M * bXi http://bluepunk.pastebin.com/m2181c04b
1186676110 M * daniel_hozac cat /proc/virtnet/<nid>/info
1186676194 M * bXi Info:   ffff81003e7ec2c0
1186676194 M * bXi 0:      [0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0:0000]
1186676194 M * bXi 0:      [2001:0610:06e0:0000:0000:0000:0000:0003/ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:0000:0000:0000:0000/64:0010]
1186676247 M * bXi this is the vserver which acts weird
1186676388 M * bXi i can give you access if you want to check it out
1186676548 Q * ema Quit: leaving
1186676692 J * DavidS cool@helios.uni-ak.ac.at
1186676714 Q * meandtheshell Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186677032 J * leebi cool@helios.uni-ak.ac.at
1186677077 M * DavidS hi leebi!
1186677095 M * leebi servus david
1186677272 J * meandtheshell ~markus@85.127.111.47
1186677333 Q * meandtheshell 
1186677659 J * lilalinux_ ~plasma@dslb-084-058-203-210.pools.arcor-ip.net
1186677762 P * leebi 
1186678013 Q * lilalinux Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186678185 J * meandtheshell ~markus@85.127.111.47
1186678794 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186678806 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186680198 Q * dos000 Quit: Ex-Chat
1186680568 M * daniel_hozac bXi: you're right, something's wrong there.
1186680841 N * esa fede
1186680862 M * daniel_hozac bXi: http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/k/delta-ipv6-fix03.diff
1186682028 M * bXi daniel_hozac: cool thanks :)
1186682092 M * daniel_hozac hold on, need to fix it...
1186682105 M * daniel_hozac okay, refresh now.
1186682108 M * Supaplex snip snip ;)
1186682254 A * bXi compiles
1186682395 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186682403 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186682545 Q * DavidS Quit: Leaving.
1186682728 M * bXi daniel_hozac: http://bluepunk.pastebin.com/m3e8e0b20
1186682971 M * daniel_hozac bXi: that's the old version of the patch ;) refresh it, and use the new one.
1186682994 M * bXi whats the md5 of the new patch?
1186683002 M * bXi because i did refresh it after you said it
1186683009 M * bXi doh
1186683009 M * daniel_hozac $ sha1sum  delta-ipv6-fix03.diff 
1186683010 M * daniel_hozac 3de9c8b6a7de5c9e87750aa8bb617a86de64a5b2  delta-ipv6-fix03.diff
1186683012 M * bXi nvm
1186683058 M * bXi wget appends a .1 when the file already exist
1186683070 M * daniel_hozac yep.. ;)
1186683100 M * daniel_hozac just revert the old one and apply the replacement.
1186683104 M * nanonyme btw, does wget support resuming?
1186683123 M * daniel_hozac yes.
1186683123 M * daniel_hozac -c
1186683129 M * nanonyme nice
1186683611 Q * duckx Remote host closed the connection
1186683638 J * duckx ~Duck@tox.dyndns.org
1186683894 M * bXi all goes well
1186683919 M * daniel_hozac that's what i'm seeing here too.
1186683949 M * bXi i wonder why that void guest is fubar tho
1186683970 M * bXi i had 4 properly working guests
1186683980 M * bXi copied 3 of them
1186683989 M * bXi 2 of those work and the last is just weird
1186684202 M * sid3windr I blame the admin!
1186684203 M * sid3windr :D
1186684239 N * DoberMann_ DoberMann
1186684324 M * Supaplex fire the admin
1186684325 M * Supaplex ;)
1186684498 A * bXi fires himself from his home
1186684503 M * Supaplex haha. :P
1186684818 M * bXi hmmm
1186684825 M * bXi theres something weird about my ipv6 setup
1186684860 M * daniel_hozac how so?
1186684870 J * bluepunk ~bluepunk@cl-998.ams-05.nl.sixxs.net
1186684872 M * bluepunk :)
1186684897 Q * bluepunk 
1186684898 J * bluepunk ~bluepunk@cl-998.ams-05.nl.sixxs.net
1186684909 M * bXi somehow it gets the wrong ip now
1186684916 M * bXi when i connect with irssi for example
1186684922 M * daniel_hozac the guest?
1186684926 M * bluepunk yeah
1186684949 M * bXi void / # ifconfig
1186684949 M * bXi eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:13:D3:E3:E9:CB inet6 addr: 2001:610:6e0::3/128 Scope:Global
1186684961 M * bXi that isnt the ip that bluepunk has
1186685082 M * daniel_hozac so it's using the host's IP address?
1186685092 M * bXi yes
1186685105 M * bXi even tho i bound the ip it should have to eth0
1186685534 A * Supaplex ponders giving guests dummy ifs
1186685557 M * Supaplex is it normal for the guest to use the host ip when ifconfig has no output in the guest?
1186685639 M * daniel_hozac if you haven't assigned the guest any addresses, yes.
1186685704 Q * Johnnie Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186685992 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186686003 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186686414 M * Supaplex normally I guess that would be ok.  Is there anyway to prevent that?
1186686500 M * daniel_hozac i think assigning it a bogus address would work.
1186686580 M * bXi daniel_hozac: in case it helps
1186686588 M * bXi that old ipv6 patch didnt have this behavious
1186686597 M * daniel_hozac yeah, i know.
1186686615 M * daniel_hozac it looks like 2.3 is missing the source address parts, i'm grabbing that right now...
1186686654 Q * gerrit Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186686697 M * bXi okay :)
1186687702 Q * ftx Read error: Connection reset by peer
1186687726 J * ftx ~gerrit@dslb-084-062-255-060.pools.arcor-ip.net
1186688118 J * yarihm ~yarihm@84-75-109-39.dclient.hispeed.ch
1186688150 M * Supaplex I think I'd have better luck with a dummy nic. :) but ok.
1186688286 J * crypt ~oli@p54A3B0B3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
1186688289 M * crypt hi all
1186688353 M * daniel_hozac hello
1186688484 M * crypt i have a short question: in the ml Bertl said, that in current testing (2.3.0.15) it is possible, to create lo devices in vservers. How do I have to configure that and is it possible with uv 213?
1186688511 M * daniel_hozac to fully use 2.3 you need util-vserver trunk.
1186688556 M * daniel_hozac if you enable the option to automatically assign it, you should be good though.
1186688597 M * daniel_hozac (you'll have to add the address manually, with e.g. ip addr add 127.<xid & 0xFF00 >> 8>.<xid & 0xFF>.1/8 dev lo)
1186688876 M * crypt hmm for the first started vserver it assigned the lo automatically
1186689008 M * daniel_hozac the address? i can assure you it didn't :)
1186689019 M * daniel_hozac note that 2.3 is still highly experimental.
1186689112 M * crypt i do not use it in a production environement, but on a testing system
1186689145 M * daniel_hozac not quite what i was referring to, things don't really work the way they should yet :)
1186689477 M * crypt hmm ok
1186689509 M * daniel_hozac think of it as a pre-preview.
1186689558 M * crypt hehe ok all right ;) i'll boot into a stable kernel ;)
1186689566 M * crypt thanks for the informations
1186689592 M * crypt is there a plan when it will come near to an rc status?
1186689593 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186689603 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186689751 M * daniel_hozac well, this is the first patch ever with all these features and the rewrite of the networking stuff. give us a couple of days to make it work ;)
1186689776 M * daniel_hozac obviously, having people test it is invaluable though.
1186689786 M * daniel_hozac bXi: http://people.linux-vserver.org/~dhozac/p/k/delta-v6saddr-hack01.diff
1186689791 M * crypt that's quite right
1186689840 M * crypt ok i'll check whether to get a amd64 machine up and running for executing some tests.
1186689872 M * crypt i talk to you when i get it
1186689914 M * daniel_hozac okay, sounds good.
1186689933 J * Aiken ~james@ppp121-45-255-55.lns2.bne4.internode.on.net
1186689998 M * crypt i'll go off now thanks for help daniel_hozac
1186690069 M * daniel_hozac you're welcome! cya!
1186690640 Q * crypt Quit: Leaving
1186691298 M * bXi daniel_hozac: compiling :)
1186692300 Q * ftx Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186692570 Q * bonbons Quit: Leaving
1186692952 Q * bluepunk Read error: Connection reset by peer
1186693193 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186693219 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186693371 J * bluepunk bluepunk@void.apparoat.nl
1186693377 M * bluepunk daniel_hozac: you the man :D
1186693390 M * bluepunk as you can see it now connects from the correct ip
1186693400 J * coderanger__ ~coderange@wireless-117.media.mit.edu
1186693465 Q * dna_ Quit: Verlassend
1186693591 M * daniel_hozac cool.
1186693683 M * Supaplex cool as in, it is the working?
1186693684 M * bXi so now the patch is usable for what i want
1186693780 Q * coderanger_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186693830 Q * bluepunk Quit: Thanks daniel_hozac 
1186693856 M * bXi Linux venice 2.6.22.1-vs2.3.0.15 #1 Thu Aug 9 22:35:52 CEST 2007 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
1186693878 M * daniel_hozac Linux siciliana.hozac.com 2.6.22.1-vs2.3.0.15 #8 SMP Thu Aug 9 13:54:57 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
1186693881 M * daniel_hozac :)
1186693903 M * daniel_hozac (my build is higher than yours, thus i win)
1186693906 M * daniel_hozac +id
1186694019 A * bXi increases kernel version :P
1186694138 Q * coderanger__ Remote host closed the connection
1186694170 J * coderanger_ ~coderange@1cc-dhcp-120.media.mit.edu
1186694184 N * DoberMann DoberMann[ZZZzzz]
1186695033 M * fede @<@
1186695269 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl
1186695273 M * Bertl greetings!
1186695338 M * bXi Bertl: !
1186695340 M * daniel_hozac morning Bertl!
1186695355 M * Bertl neuralis: just arrived at the inn ... will see if I get something to eat around here ... 
1186695360 J * Blissex ~Blissex@82-69-39-138.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk
1186695375 M * daniel_hozac Bertl: how was the flight?
1186695385 M * Bertl long :)
1186695404 M * daniel_hozac hehe.
1186695435 M * Bertl have seen better and worse ... it was mainly uneventful
1186695436 M * bXi Bertl: i'm now running that 2.3.0.15 patch with help from daniel_hozac 
1186695448 M * Bertl bXi: excellent! how is it doing?
1186695450 M * bXi and ipv6 works proper!
1186695461 M * bXi (after some bugfinding and such)
1186695505 M * Bertl sounds great!
1186695526 M * Bertl what we should definitely test are the following points:
1186695538 M * Bertl - proper isolation (i.e. no crosstalk)
1186695566 M * Bertl - proper device/route/network hiding (guess that is mostly missing right now)
1186695586 M * bXi how can i test those?
1186695588 M * Bertl - adressability for inbound connections
1186695604 M * Bertl at a later time we should also look into mapped (ipv4) adresses
1186695625 M * Bertl which I would like to see handled by the normal ipv4 checks
1186695700 Q * yarihm Quit: This computer has gone to sleep
1186695717 M * Bertl besides that, we have to test ipv4 isolation once again, as some of the network changes are significant
1186695737 M * daniel_hozac indeed
1186695746 M * Bertl but it is good to hear that it 'works' so far ...
1186695782 M * Bertl daniel_hozac: maybe you have a great idea to implement the 'upcoming' cross type colission checks?
1186695801 M * Bertl i.e. we need to do all combinations of address, network and range
1186695822 M * bXi i'm still learning about ipv6 so i might find a lot of weird things :)
1186695838 M * Bertl where address and network should allow broadcasts but without collisions if doable :)
1186695882 M * Bertl bXi: yeah, I guess we could benefit from bonbons having a deep look at the code too :)
1186695905 M * daniel_hozac definitely.
1186696008 J * FireEgl FireEgl@Atlantica.Inet6.Info
1186696106 M * Bertl okay, I'm off getting some groceries, then I definitely need a shower and some sleep .. but I should be back for a little after the shower (before the sleep)
1186696120 N * Bertl Bertl_oO
1186696121 M * daniel_hozac okay, cya!
1186696792 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186696803 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186697799 Q * meandtheshell Quit: Leaving.
1186697972 J * slack101 ~Administr@cpe-71-74-68-82.insight.res.rr.com
1186697975 M * slack101 start
1186697975 M * slack101 vdu: stat(): No such file or directory
1186697975 M * slack101 Failed to start vserver 'p
1186697980 M * slack101 what does this mean ?
1186698088 M * daniel_hozac that the directory you specified for the disk limits doesn't exist.
1186698205 Q * Blissex Remote host closed the connection
1186698506 M * slack101 daniel_hozac: it must have disappeared
1186698515 M * slack101 cause  this thing was wroking ;)
1186698904 M * slack101 what is that command again for seeing the vserver root dir etc ? 
1186698926 M * slack101 i think debian is messing with me again
1186699108 M * slack101 seee
1186699111 M * slack101 look
1186699117 M * slack101 oops wrong im
1186699314 M * slack101 ok fixed that i think
1186699317 M * slack101 'new error though
1186699318 M * slack101 http://phpfi.com/255400
1186699320 M * slack101 any ideas?
1186699514 J * cehteh ~ct@pipapo.org
1186699601 M * daniel_hozac it means what it says, you configured the scheduler incorrectly by using a non-numeric value for the priority bias.
1186699638 M * slack101 where is the cpu limits set what dir ? 
1186699658 M * slack101 //
1186699661 M * slack101 //dd
1186699672 M * slack101 //etc/vservers/name/cpuset
1186699971 M * slack101 can you use any number as a cpu limit 
1186699975 M * slack101 like 25 percent ?
1186699994 M * slack101 blah i will figure ito ut 
1186700003 M * daniel_hozac yes.
1186700014 M * slack101 8
1186700014 M * slack101 32
1186700014 M * slack101 500
1186700014 M * slack101 200
1186700014 M * slack101 1000
1186700015 M * slack101 dummy
1186700019 M * slack101 theres my schedule file 
1186700022 M * slack101 whats wrong with that ?
1186700033 M * daniel_hozac does dummy look like a number to you?
1186700355 Q * bzed Quit: Leaving
1186700393 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving
1186700406 J * buzztracker ~buzztrack@pelikan.garga.net
1186700425 J * lilalinux__ ~plasma@dslb-084-058-204-101.pools.arcor-ip.net
1186700722 M * slack101 to do scheduler ing do i need to enable CPU Hard Scheduling: ? 
1186700760 M * daniel_hozac if you want hard scheduling, yes.
1186700852 M * slack101 whats the other option ?
1186700855 Q * lilalinux_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186700858 M * slack101 sorry never looked into options like this 
1186700867 M * slack101 but i  got a user using 42 percent of cpu 
1186700938 M * daniel_hozac the other "option" is to use priority scheduling.
1186701314 M * slack101 daniel_hozac: i just want if a user uses any more then 20 percent of cpu just kill it 
1186701448 M * daniel_hozac "kill it"? that's not supported at all.
1186702235 J * psithris ~psithris@88.218.94.235
1186702253 M * psithris Hi guys :)
1186702274 M * daniel_hozac hello
1186702350 M * psithris I am just repartitioning my system and I am thinking to create one partition for each vserver that I have. Will it create a problem for the chroot barrier applied on /vserer ?
1186702379 M * daniel_hozac no, but you won't be able to reap the benefits of unification/hashification.
1186702415 M * psithris can you make this more clear ?
1186702468 M * daniel_hozac hashification is the process that lets your guests share files, thus decreasing their disk and memory footprint.
1186702635 M * psithris can you provide me with a link in documentation about this issue ? I am not aware of this. I suppose that you are not talking about mounting filesystems of the base system from the vserver
1186702672 M * psithris ( or just say "google is your friend" )
1186702680 M * daniel_hozac http://linux-vserver.org/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_is_unification_.28vunify.29.3F
1186702839 M * psithris thank you. That was helpfull
1186702898 M * psithris I would also like to make another question that I have already done in this channel, but have not found a solution:
1186702923 M * psithris Is it possible to use rbac + grsec + vservers ?
1186702971 M * psithris I have found some old patches (2005 I think) but they seem not to be developed anymore
1186703175 M * psithris daniel ? are you aware of this ?
1186703424 M * daniel_hozac as i told you last time, if it's part of grsec, i don't see why it wouldn't work.
1186703460 M * psithris oh. Sorry I forgot that we talked together
1186703829 Q * slack101 Ping timeout: 480 seconds
1186703992 Q * buzztracker Quit: Leaving