1141778164 Q * phycho Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141778266 J * phycho ~phycho@ext-gw.darktech.org.uk 1141778274 M * phycho Linux gw 2.4.32-QoS-grsec-vs1.2.10 #3 Tue Mar 7 23:46:45 GMT 2006 i686 pi386 GNU/Linux 1141778275 M * phycho :D 1141778442 M * mugwump heh, that's a mighty patchy kernel y'got there :) 1141778488 M * phycho lol 1141778496 M * phycho isnt half dude.. you should see the patch list lol 1141778524 M * phycho http://pastebin.com/590037 1141778525 M * phycho lol 1141779686 M * phycho hey 1141779690 M * phycho how do i remove the vservers folder? 1141779698 M * phycho root@gw:/# chmod 777 vservers 1141779698 M * phycho chmod: changing permissions of `vservers': Operation not permitted 1141779700 M * phycho :X 1141779719 M * mugwump what does showattr /vservers say? 1141779734 M * phycho d--------- 2 root root 1024 2006-03-08 00:57 vservers/ 1141779799 M * doener_ lsattr -d /vservers ? 1141779824 M * phycho root@gw:/usr/src# lsattr -d /vservers 1141779824 M * phycho -----------t- /vservers 1141779824 M * phycho root@gw:/usr/src# 1141779842 M * doener_ chattr -t /vservers 1141779850 M * phycho done 1141779855 M * phycho ty 1141779859 M * phycho first ive ever had that problem .. 1141779864 M * phycho whats "t" flag for? 1141779881 M * doener_ 'tail', but in Linux-VServer terms it is the chroot barrier 1141779895 M * phycho aah 1141779899 M * doener_ the 2.6 version doesn't abuse the attribute anymore 1141779905 M * phycho k 1141779978 M * phycho any ideas if using 'cfdisk' to add another partition to a disk and write the partition table? 1141779984 M * phycho would that destroy the partitions already there? 1141779984 M * doener_ hm, it is 'notail' actually. but well... ;) 1141779995 M * mugwump is that chroot barrier or immulink? 1141780045 M * doener_ mugwump: wasn't that the same on 2.4? tbh I have no idea ;) 1141780080 M * mugwump well, initially the solution to the chroot problem was just the 000 permission 1141780082 M * doener_ http://linux-vserver.org/chroot-barrier 1141780092 M * doener_ good that I have written some docs back then :) 1141780116 M * mugwump but that attribute was probably immulink 1141780133 M * mugwump the bit we picked for it got used by that tail merge attribute 1141780143 M * doener_ mugwump: you mean as opposed to 'notail'? 1141780158 M * mugwump notail is short for no tail merge 1141780170 M * doener_ yeah... 1141780201 M * doener_ i am currently wondering about "but that attribute was probably immulink" 1141780230 M * doener_ it is (probably) immulink, but also part of the barrier... 1141780304 M * doener_ anyway, i have quite some problems understanding english lately, so we probably mean the same and I'm just weird right now ;) 1141780405 Q * brc Quit: BitchX: the un-Cola 1141780710 Q * phycho Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141780729 J * brc bruce@20151181056.user.veloxzone.com.br 1141780734 Q * brc Quit: 1141780742 J * brc bruce@20151181056.user.veloxzone.com.br 1141781066 J * phycho ~phycho@ext-gw.darktech.org.uk 1141781069 M * phycho hey guys 1141781076 M * phycho any way to create a vserver with a different distro than the host system? 1141781105 M * phycho im using a really old -STABLE version of vserver 1141781110 M * phycho 1.2.10 1141781382 Q * sladen Read error: Connection reset by peer 1141781396 J * sladen paul@starsky.19inch.net 1141781493 M * phycho theres no vserver-new command with the old release of vserver ;/ 1141781548 M * doener_ it's "vserver build" actually with util-vserver 0.30.x, and that is agnostic of the kernel patch version 1141781571 M * phycho agnostic? 1141781592 M * phycho and how do i assign it an ip in such an old version? :P 1141781601 M * doener_ you can use it with almost any version of the kernel patch, 1.2 series, 2.0 series, doesn't matter 1141781620 M * phycho so i can use any utility version.. right? 1141781620 M * doener_ that depends on the version of the tools, not of the kernel patch 1141781626 M * doener_ yes 1141781629 M * phycho k 1141781630 M * phycho cool 1141781640 A * phycho goes to install a newer one :) 1141781722 M * phycho can i use one of the development version of tools then? 1141781733 M * doener_ you should go for 0.30.210 1141781738 M * phycho k 1141781752 M * phycho kernel version? or userland version? 1141781757 M * phycho http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/d_release/overview/ 1141781759 M * phycho i only see those 1141781762 M * doener_ util-vserver version 1141781772 M * phycho no 0.30.210 in there 1141781778 M * phycho any ideas? 1141781799 M * doener_ http://www.13thfloor.at/~ensc/util-vserver/files/alpha/ 1141781813 M * phycho k 1141781820 M * phycho aah 1141781822 M * phycho thanks 1141781846 M * doener_ kernel patch should be 1.2.10 for 2.4, the 1.3 series isn't maintained anymore AFAIK 1141781859 M * phycho im using 1.2.10 yep 1141781864 M * phycho Linux gw 2.4.32-QoS-grsec-vs1.2.10 #3 Tue Mar 7 23:46:45 GMT 2006 i686 pentium2 i386 GNU/Linux 1141782907 J * torabora ~asdasd@178gis168.gulftel.com 1141782916 P * torabora 1141783044 J * Smutje_ ~Smutje@xdsl-87-78-16-5.netcologne.de 1141783154 Q * Smutje Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141783154 N * Smutje_ Smutje 1141783400 M * phycho vc_get_task_xid(): Invalid argument 1141783400 M * phycho Failed to determine current context; aborting... 1141783403 M * phycho anyone know what that means? 1141784220 M * mugwump phycho: that's a new API call being made on an old kernel, I think 1141784224 M * mugwump phycho: strace() is 1141784231 M * mugwump strace it, even :) 1141784388 M * phycho so much for the new tools being able to be used on old systems then :P 1141784947 M * mugwump phycho: did you tell configure that you only wanted the old API? 1141784980 M * phycho nope? 1141785016 M * mugwump when you build util-vserver, check the options to configure 1141785036 M * mugwump you can specify which of the various APIs you wish to build support for 1141785043 M * mugwump perhaps legacy is not enabled by default 1141785056 M * phycho aah 1141785618 Q * PilatomiK Quit: Leaving 1141788131 Q * doener_ Quit: leaving 1141790031 J * matta ~matta@c-68-81-35-243.hsd1.pa.comcast.net 1141790750 Q * phycho Quit: 1141795699 J * coocoon ~coocoon@p54A06897.dip.t-dialin.net 1141795935 M * coocoon morning 1141798132 Q * matta Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141801635 J * Loki_muh loki@213.133.125.66 1141801695 Q * Loki|muh Read error: Connection reset by peer 1141801878 Q * meebey Read error: Connection reset by peer 1141801896 J * meebey meebey@booster.qnetp.net 1141804922 J * ||Cobra|| ~cob@pc-csa01.science.uva.nl 1141806462 J * exp[a] USERNAME@eserv.comex.ru 1141807251 Q * shedi Quit: Leaving 1141808986 J * pflanze ~chris@84-73-54-235.dclient.hispeed.ch 1141809026 M * pflanze Hello. Would chbind work on a non-vserver-patched kernel? I think not, but somehow I hope it would. 1141809100 M * pflanze (And if not: is there no alternative way to make a process use another interface's ip address for outgoing connections?) 1141809280 M * SiD3WiNDR depends on the process I guess 1141809729 J * pagano ~pagano@lappagano.cnaf.infn.it 1141809936 M * pagano hi guys 1141810836 J * JonB ~NoSuchUse@kg45.kollegiegaarden.dk 1141810846 M * JonB damn, bertl is not here :-( 1141811131 M * daniel_hozac nope. 1141811141 M * JonB i found some interesting hardware 1141811153 M * daniel_hozac oh? 1141811158 M * JonB Unisys Mainframe ES 7000 1141811171 M * JonB 8x Intel Pentium 3 Xeon 700 mhz m 2mb cache mulighed for 16 procesoor 1141811171 M * JonB 4 gb ram mulighed for 32 gb, 1141811171 M * JonB 2x 9,1 gb scsi diske 1141811201 M * daniel_hozac nice 1141811202 M * JonB an 8 way machine 1141811210 M * JonB i figured that he might want to test it 1141811218 M * JonB the only problem is the electrical bill :-( 1141811233 M * JonB i think it's gonna be big :-( 1141811245 M * daniel_hozac probably. 1141811419 M * JonB i wonder if i could get the local lug to pay the power 1141811846 J * mikmak ~mikmak@iflap2.ujf-grenoble.fr 1141811855 M * mikmak hello 1141811916 M * mikmak I have a host with 2 NICs and 2 IPs on different subnets, I would like to have one vserver to use one of this IP and be routed through it, and another vserver to use the other IP's subnet. Is there some doc on how to do that ? 1141811938 M * mikmak I would need a different default gw on each vserver actually 1141811997 M * JonB you can always use the iproute packet 1141812005 M * JonB that allows more advanced rotuing 1141812029 M * mikmak ok, but how do I tell iproute which vserver to route ? :) 1141812042 M * JonB based on the source ip address 1141812449 M * daniel_hozac this has been described multiple times on the mailing list. 1141812456 M * daniel_hozac i'm fairly certain it's also on the wiki. 1141812601 M * SiD3WiNDR what's "mulighed" ? :) 1141812651 M * mikmak well I checked the wiki and haven't found anything ;) 1141812664 M * mikmak except the ngnet thing which is not stable yet 1141812785 M * daniel_hozac http://archives.linux-vserver.org/200311/0470.html 1141812858 M * mikmak thanks :) 1141813027 Q * Aiken Quit: Leaving 1141813267 J * shedi ~siggi@tolvudeild-204.lhi.is 1141813995 Q * exp[a] Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141814344 J * lilalinux ~plasma@h1-gw.of.net-lab.net 1141814480 M * mikmak thanks I got it to work :) 1141814492 Q * pflanze Quit: [x]chat 1141816990 J * meandtheshell ~markus@85-124-15-159.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at 1141818723 J * andrew_ling andrew_lin@231.198.233.220.exetel.com.au 1141818725 P * andrew_ling 1141820617 J * chirp ~chirp@202-169-194-76.megapass.world-net.co.nz 1141821097 M * chirp can anyone point me to some good info about running screen inside a guest - i'm getting ye olde "No more PTYs" issue.. apologies if i've missed an obvious answer in my googlin' 1141821287 M * mnemoc chirp: the easier way is to start an sshd inside the guest, that way screen will use that pts 1141821520 M * chirp hrmm... thats what I'm doing.. i.e. not using vserver enter - any suggestions? 1141821598 N * Bertl_oO Bertl 1141821602 M * Bertl morning folks! 1141821613 M * chirp hi 1141821620 M * JonB hey Bertl 1141821644 M * coocoon hi 1141821658 M * coocoon Bertl: have u got my messages yesterday 1141821662 M * Bertl chirp: what _are_ you doing precisely? 1141821663 M * Roey hey Bertl! 1141821698 M * chirp Bertl: ssh user@guest.vsever, then just "screen" as non-root user 1141821739 M * chirp Bertl: from an xterm on my workstation 1141821779 M * Bertl coocoon: I think no ... 1141821820 M * JonB Bertl: i found this interesting machine... a unisys mainframe. 8way xeon (though just 700Mhz) and i was thinking vserver test machine 1141821844 M * Bertl JonB: sounds good 1141821876 M * JonB Bertl: except when you consider the elektrical bill 1141821898 M * JonB Bertl: but i'll see what i can do, the seller has not even said the location yet 1141821934 M * Bertl i.c. 1141821971 M * JonB Bertl: and i was thinking of asking the local lug to pay the electrical bill, host it and ... to gain a special testing machine for kernel coding 1141821980 M * JonB Bertl: but, we'll see 1141822049 M * Bertl well, I _think_ somebody will be able to host it in the area once we know where it is ... 1141822197 J * doener ~doener@i5387F8BC.versanet.de 1141822203 M * JonB Bertl: it is probably in denmark somewhere 1141822235 M * phreak`` Bertl: heya :) 1141822250 M * doener morning :) 1141822265 M * phreak`` (and of course all other folks who are around :P) 1141822292 M * phreak`` doener: got a minute or so ? need help ;) 1141822313 M * doener sure... not sure if i'll be of any help though ;) 1141822317 M * JonB Bertl: but i think it would be used by other kernel hackers than just you 1141822348 M * coocoon bertl: no offline messges possible, so this is my error http://pastebin.com/590661 util-vserver: 0.30.210 1141822353 M * JonB Bertl: at least that was the intention to maximize the usage 1141822383 M * coocoon bertl: it happens to all vservers (Debian/ FC/Centos/gentoo) 1141822418 M * Bertl JonB: that's perfectly fine for me 1141822451 M * coocoon bertl: with util-vserver: 0.30.209 all works fine --> tesme.sh also works fine, with util-vserver: 0.30.210, testme.sh failled with missing chbind 1141822461 M * doener why should I? I can 'enjoy' matt here as well... *g* 1141822468 M * doener argh! 1141822470 M * Bertl coocoon: not unusual, either configure with --enable-apis=NOLEGACY 1141822501 M * coocoon bertl: during configure, right? 1141822503 M * Bertl coocoon: or configure the kernel to _not_ use the legacy apii 1141822533 M * doener i guess I'll never manage to get irssi's input focus right... 1141822545 M * coocoon bertl: ok thanx for the fast solution ;-) 1141822554 M * coocoon bertl: I will try 1141822555 M * Bertl coocoon: you're welcome! 1141822847 M * coocoon bertl: what have been changed in 0.30.210 to set this 1141822865 M * Bertl the old legacy interfaces have been deprecated 1141822887 M * Bertl the slightly 'confusing' NOLEGACY actually means that the 1141822903 M * Bertl legacy interfaces except for the very very old ones are enabled 1141822913 M * Bertl (not as one might think disabled) 1141822940 M * Bertl currently your kernel is in legacy mode, but the tools only support the latest apis 1141822953 M * Bertl # 1141822954 M * Bertl v13,net 1141823141 M * coocoon so what is better set it in the kernel or during installation of util-vserver 1141823186 M * chirp solved, user was not in tty group. i am an idiot. 1141823212 M * Bertl well, better is to configure the kernel for non legacy stuff, but it is more complicated and you have to make sure you have no legacy guests 1141823219 M * Bertl chirp: np, happens sometimes 1141823254 M * coocoon Bertl: how to get to know, whether my guests ar legacy or not 1141823435 M * Bertl good indication is an old style (file based e.g. name.conf) config 1141823472 M * Bertl guest xids over 49151 (in vserver-stat) are another indication (i.e. you are missing a context entry) 1141823499 Q * chirp Quit: Leaving 1141823649 M * coocoon bertl: oh ok I think that my system isn't involved 1141823657 M * coocoon so I will set it in the kernel 1141823660 M * coocoon thanx 1141823886 J * chirp ~chirp@202-169-194-76.megapass.world-net.co.nz 1141824114 J * phycho ~phycho@ext-gw.darktech.org.uk 1141824121 M * phycho hey guys.. what version of vserver should i use for 2.4 1141824123 M * phycho for the kernel patch 1141824126 M * phycho the development release? 1141824131 M * phycho http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/d_release/v1.3.9/ 1141824253 M * Bertl phreak``: no, the stable banch is the only (somewhat) maintained 1141824289 M * phycho Bertl - should i use development? 1141824552 M * phreak`` Bertl: I didn't do anything ;) 1141824748 M * phreak`` Bertl: do the 2.0.2 and 2.1.1 really differ that much ? (wrt. http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/delta-quota-fix01.diff), since that HANDLE_CASE doesn't exist 1141824958 M * Bertl phycho: the previous line was for you, my fault, sorry phreak``! 1141824973 M * phreak`` Bertl: no problem :) 1141824977 M * Bertl so, phycho: no, the stable banch is the only (somewhat) maintained 1141825120 M * doener phreak``: the patch fixes kernel command line parsing of debug options, that stuff doesn't exists in 2.0.2, so you can leave that patch out 1141825148 M * phreak`` doener: thanks a lot, thats what I wanted to hear :) 1141825293 M * Bertl btw, what do you think of the http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/delta-vproc-fix01.diff 1141825442 M * scotti hmm, is there an how-to arround how i can migrate guests from an linux-vserver 1.x system to a linux-vserver 2.x system? 1141825507 M * Bertl well, if you 'just' want to run them on the 2.x system, it should work out of the box, (given that you have the legacy stuff enabled for legacy guests) 1141826024 M * scotti Bertl: ah thx, will have a look at it 1141826396 P * mikmak Kopete 0.11.1 : http://kopete.kde.org 1141826516 Q * chirp Quit: Leaving 1141826546 J * chirp ~chirp@202-169-194-76.megapass.world-net.co.nz 1141826687 M * doener Bertl: hm, looks good, the other stuff in there is already like that anyway, so you would just have to guess the name, right? 1141826805 Q * chirp Quit: 1141826824 M * Bertl doener: yup 1141826896 J * Smutje_ ~Smutje@xdsl-87-78-84-138.netcologne.de 1141827004 Q * Smutje Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141827004 N * Smutje_ Smutje 1141827043 M * phycho Bertl - damn =( 1141827049 M * phycho why cant you guys support 2.4 more 1141827052 M * phycho 2.6 is a pile of dung 1141827142 M * Bertl phycho: hmm, I even updated my workstations by now (to 2.6 :) 1141827165 M * phycho i refuse to use it 1141827170 M * Bertl phycho: but feel free to use the 2.4 branch, it works quite well 1141827171 M * phycho it doesnt work as well as it should 1141827173 M * phycho k. 1141827181 M * doener Bertl: but you didn't apply a dozen patches, did you? ;) 1141827188 M * phycho haha 1141827202 M * Bertl doener: no, none at all actually ... 1141827208 A * phycho requires those dozen patches 1141827243 M * phycho its a one box does all situation ;) 1141827331 M * phycho its the grsecurity thats a bastard than anything else 1141827350 M * phycho does not play well with a lot of things 1141827406 M * Bertl phycho: what kind of patches do you need for the 'perfect' 2.4 branch? 1141827461 M * phycho its a gateway.. so a lot of relevant stuff for that 1141827463 M * phycho sec ill get a list 1141827467 M * doener http://pastebin.com/590037 1141827480 M * doener the list from yesterday ;) 1141827490 M * phycho yep 1141827499 M * phycho that lot 1141827517 M * Bertl hmm, looks like some 2.6 patches there, how comes? 1141827555 M * Bertl somehow my guts tell me that 2.6 would obsolete the majority of those patches ... 1141827563 M * phycho it doesnt 1141827571 M * phycho WRR etc is not in 2.6 1141827584 M * phycho the 2.6 patches are for iproute, not for kernel 1141827605 M * Bertl ah, so what patches are for the kernel? 1141827634 M * phycho all but ppp and iproute and iptables 1141827647 M * Bertl what's the wrr stuff doing? 1141827710 M * Bertl (doesn't look awfully large to me :) 1141827713 M * phycho http://wipl-wrr.sourceforge.net/wrr.html 1141827716 M * phycho its for QoS 1141827732 M * Bertl isn't QoS in 2.6? 1141827738 M * phycho yes.. but not wrr. 1141827757 M * phycho http://relaks.info/linux/mq/stable/ 1141827764 M * Bertl and they stopped development 2002 ... wonder why ... 1141827765 M * phycho thats whats in the mq2 patchset that i apply 1141827774 M * phycho because its finished. 1141827790 M * Bertl ah, that sounds good :) 1141827803 M * phycho someone else is working on 2.6 1141827818 M * phycho http://www.zz9.dk/wrr/ 1141827866 M * phycho so far ive got all the patches in together.. just need vserver in now :-) 1141827900 M * phycho patch-2.4.30-vs1.2.10.diff 1141827902 M * phycho that one right? 1141827946 M * phycho lol ouch. 20+ failed chunks 1141827949 A * phycho goes to hack at code 1141827963 J * matta ~matta@c-68-32-239-173.hsd1.pa.comcast.net 1141827982 M * Bertl phycho: there is a 1.2.11-pre release 1141828002 M * phycho whats the difference? 1141828017 M * Bertl but do you need the wrr stuff at all, I mean, it seems like it can be done via simple TC based classes too? 1141828026 M * phycho yeah i need it 1141828041 M * phycho tc isnt that good ;) 1141828133 M * Bertl gmm, rc1 even ... http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.4.31-vs1.2.11-rc1.diff 1141828148 M * phycho k cool ty 1141828172 J * rs ~rs@office.dailymotion.com 1141828179 M * Bertl welcome rs! 1141828186 M * Bertl welcome matta! 1141828422 M * eyck yo 1141828566 M * coocoon bertl: questions about nat for vservers 1141828581 Q * meandtheshell Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141828670 M * coocoon bertl: mom 1141828675 M * Bertl :) 1141828841 M * coocoon bertl: got this error message: http://pastebin.com/590806 after starting default-vservers 1141828842 M * coocoon bertl: here r my nat 1.) iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 1.2.3.4 -d ! 1.2.3.4 -j SNAT --to-source "HostIP" 2.) iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --destination-port 2221 -j DNAT --to-destination 1.2.3.4:22 SNAT --to-source "HostIP" 1141828884 M * coocoon bertl: one or two vservers won't start then, also everything is working fine after starting them manually 1141828900 M * coocoon bertl: -also +but 1141828926 M * coocoon bertl: I thought my nat settings are right 1141828976 M * Bertl hmm, who is doing the iptables command in your guest startup? 1141829013 M * coocoon bertl: u have asked last time, but I do not know no one :-) I think 1141829016 M * Bertl I mean, the guest is not supposed to issue any iptables commands, they will fail ... 1141829051 M * Bertl it is strange that your sin02 guest does do any iptables commands 1141829104 M * coocoon right it is independent from guest, because of I have no vserver installed, not laughing, I started to set them up, but I have a "skeleton", 1141829106 M * Bertl the iptable commands you listed above seem mangled 1141829132 M * Bertl there is no DNAT/SNAT combo as you have in 2.) 1141829162 M * Bertl okay, the sin02 is only a skeleton? 1141829211 M * Bertl in this case I'd suspect that everything works fine, and the iptables line is from the 'next' runlevel service 1141829216 M * doener heh, sendfile becomes a never ending story :) 1141829218 M * coocoon bertl: yes, but if there is a vserver installed there is the same error message so it can't have anything to do wit the guest os or some iptables settings in the guest 1141829254 M * coocoon bertl: 1141829258 M * Bertl doener: it seems so, I assume kernel folks are slowly patching up sendfile, and we are behind there (because we have to adjust the missing parts 1141829290 M * coocoon 1. is for the internet access and 2. is for the ports 1141829301 M * Bertl yeah, but 2 is wrong/mangled 1141829309 M * Bertl should be something like: 1141829323 M * Bertl iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --destination-port 2221 -j DNAT --to-destination 1.2.3.4:22 1141829331 M * Bertl (without the SNAT --to-source "HostIP part) 1141829399 M * coocoon bertl: ok thanx I will try it, I know it is not vserver specific 1141829459 Q * Wenix Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141829593 M * Snow-Man How does 'vserver blah stop' work wrt SysV init? 1141829607 M * Snow-Man It's running a bunch of stuff that I don't think it should be running. :( 1141829611 M * Bertl Snow-Man: it simply calls the stop scripts 1141829638 M * Snow-Man Bertl: I get the sinking feeling that it doesn't do what actual SysV does. 1141829652 M * Bertl hmm, in what way? 1141829665 M * Snow-Man Bertl: It doesn't appear to just call the stop scripts for the things which are started in the associated runlevel... 1141829680 M * coocoon bertl: sorry here are the right entries 1141829682 M * Bertl coocoon: you're welcome! try to figure _why_ the sin02 reports errors ... 1141829690 M * coocoon bertl: 1. iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 1.2.3.0 -d ! 1.2.3.0 -j SNAT --to-source 85.214.22.240 1141829705 M * Snow-Man From the update-rc.d manpage under Debian...: 1141829708 M * coocoon bertl: 2. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --destination-port 2220 -j DNAT --to-destination 1.2.3.0:22 1141829713 M * Snow-Man The correct way to disable services is to configure the service as stopped in all runlevels in which it is started by default. In the System V init system this means renaming the service's symbolic links from S to K." 1141829723 M * coocoon bertl: I have made a mistake during copy and paste 1141829762 M * Bertl Snow-Man: yes, so the K* scripts are executed on runlevel exit, and the S* scripts on runlevel enter ... 1141829775 M * Bertl coocoon: that looks better ... 1141829784 M * Snow-Man hmmmmm. 1141829805 M * coocoon bertl: sorry yes I haven't change anything 1141829810 M * Snow-Man The problem is that I don't want the damn script to be run at all. 1141829830 M * coocoon bertl: they must be right 1141829835 M * Bertl Snow-Man: which one? 1141829846 M * Snow-Man Bertl: Well, 'umountfs', for one. 1141829855 M * Bertl Snow-Man: removing K and S entries should do that, no? 1141829867 M * Snow-Man I don't want them to come back when I upgrade the Debian package though. 1141829874 M * Bertl Snow-Man: on most distros chkconfig helps you with that setup 1141829896 M * Snow-Man When doing 'stop', what runlevels are entered/left? 1141829903 M * Bertl Snow-Man: and if debian 'knows' better, then that is a debian issue 1141829905 M * Snow-Man Don't just just enter 0, you don't leave it? 1141829910 M * Snow-Man s/just/you/ 1141830054 J * meandtheshell ~markus@85-124-32-52.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at 1141830129 M * Bertl Snow-Man: usually you leave the 'current' runlevel and enter the 'new' one, e.g. 5->0 means 1141830144 M * Bertl all K* scripts from 5 are executed before the S* scripts of 0 1141830156 M * Bertl welcome meandtheshell! 1141830168 M * meandtheshell Bertl: hi ;-) 1141830174 M * Snow-Man Sure, the K* scripts of 5, then the S* scripts of 0, but the K* scripts of 0 aren't run, are they? 1141830189 M * doener Bertl: i'll look into the sendfile issue (actually, i'm already at it) 1141830372 Q * shedi Quit: Leaving 1141830610 Q * Hunger arion.oftc.net europa.oftc.net 1141830683 J * Hunger Hunger.hu@Hunger.hu 1141830723 M * Bertl doener: excellent, tx! 1141830955 Q * Hunger arion.oftc.net europa.oftc.net 1141831022 J * Hunger Hunger.hu@Hunger.hu 1141831125 J * frz ~frzzzz100@jaim.at 1141831136 M * frz hi 1141831170 M * Bertl hey frz! 1141831185 Q * JonB Quit: Leaving 1141831222 M * frz hi bertl :) 1141831339 M * frz would like to make ulimit -n for some programs - what is the actual state how todo this with 2.6 vs 2.0 1141831344 J * nomad_cz szywhjns@nezmar.netlab.cz 1141831464 M * Snow-Man Warning: Executing wildcard deletion to stay compatible with old scripts. 1141831468 M * Snow-Man What's that all about? 1141831502 M * nomad_cz Hi. Is it possible to setup X desktop in vserver ? I mean X including nvida drivers (hw acceleration) ... 1141831591 M * doener Snow-Man: a change in recent iproute versions. you can have the same address more than once if the prefix is different 1141831596 M * doener inet 1.2.3.4/24 scope global eth0 1141831596 M * doener inet 1.2.3.4/32 scope global eth0 1141831609 Q * pagano Quit: Leaving 1141831635 M * Snow-Man Nevermind, I forgot to touch nodev. :) 1141831650 M * doener "ip a d 1.2.3.4" will then randomly(?) delete one of them 1141831662 M * Snow-Man doener: Nice. :) 1141831707 M * Snow-Man Bertl: I figured out the SysV stuff, btw. 1141831710 M * doener no idea what having the same address with different prefixes is good for though 1141831742 M * Snow-Man Bertl: You have to put 'K' links into the 'previous' (ie: rc3.d in this case) runlevel to make it not run those K scripts again. 1141832112 J * hijacker ~hijacker@cable-84-43-140-185.mnet.bg 1141832115 M * hijacker hi all 1141832122 M * Bertl welcome hijacker! 1141832145 M * hijacker lool - that;s nice topic ;-) 1141832162 M * Bertl you like it? 1141832171 M * phycho heh, i think ive finally got vserver to work with all my patches 1141832172 M * phycho ;) 1141832176 M * phycho or at least.. its compiling 1141832178 M * phycho which is a start. 1141832179 M * hijacker yes, i do, that is true 1141832197 M * hijacker just installed the vserver on my debian box from the .debs phycho 1141832221 M * hijacker struggling now to get it working(setup) 1141832226 M * phycho hehe 1141832227 M * phycho fun ;/ 1141832230 M * hijacker aye ;-) 1141832234 M * phycho ill be joining you shortly 1141832247 M * phycho just managed to get grsecurity compiled along with vserver ;) 1141832252 M * phycho after a lot of manually editing kernel src ;/ 1141832257 M * hijacker lool 1141832266 M * hijacker that should be time consuming I presume... 1141832277 M * phycho few hours to get it to work with all my patches 1141832283 M * phycho whats amusing, is that i know nothing of C 1141832284 J * Duckx ~duckx@195.75.27.158 1141832286 M * phycho yet still managing it 1141832287 M * phycho haha 1141832331 M * phycho spoke too soon 1141832333 M * phycho *sighs* 1141832337 M * phycho : undefined reference to `proc_pid_readdir' 1141832337 M * phycho fs/fs.o(.text+0x27842): In function `proc_root_readdir': 1141832337 M * phycho : undefined reference to `proc_pid_readdir' 1141832337 M * phycho make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 1141832339 M * phycho heh 1141832371 M * Bertl interesting ... you probably missed a few hunks 1141832382 M * phycho yeah ;/ how gay 1141832385 M * phycho need to do it all again 1141832396 M * hijacker ;-) 1141832410 M * phycho oh the joys of manual patching! 1141832511 Q * gerrit Quit: Client exiting 1141832537 M * hijacker still i cannot believe you know nothing about c and are editing the kernel sources 1141832585 M * Bertl hijacker: some folks are brave .. others ... :) 1141832616 M * Bertl phycho: what are you trying to combine/patch btw? 1141832626 M * phycho Bertl - all of those i had in that list 1141832639 M * phycho with vserver 1141832643 M * Bertl on 2.4 1141832672 M * Bertl and you got the 1.2.11-rc1 patch, right? 1141832686 M * eyck oh goodie 1141832691 M * eyck we're working on 1.2.11 again? 1141832704 M * Bertl eyck: sure, always, wanna team up? :) 1141832707 M * phycho yep 1141832709 M * eyck sure, why not 1141832711 P * nomad_cz 1141832734 M * eyck phycho: all your problems are cause by grsec. Howgh. 1141832754 M * phycho yep 1141832755 M * eyck caused 1141832757 M * phycho nothing new there dude. 1141832765 M * phycho grsec is a bastard when you try to compile it with anything else 1141832789 M * eyck well, if I would be saying anything new, I wouldn't be using 'Howgh', 1141832797 M * phycho lol 1141832804 M * eyck with new things all bets are off...everything could've gone wrong.. 1141832805 M * phycho it does a good job though 1141832818 M * eyck yeah, of keeping admins busy 1141832829 M * phycho haha 1141832844 M * eyck we wouldn't want those lazy bastard to be reading bash.org or sth... 1141832849 M * eyck bastards even. 1141832857 M * phycho lol 1141832919 M * phycho i might do some manual hacking on 2.6.x 1141832922 M * phycho if this doesnt work 1141832927 M * Bertl wasn't there a nice vserver/grsec combo patch for 2.4? 1141832939 M * eyck yeah! there were lots of those! 1141832951 M * eyck every kid and his dog had one of his own 1141832952 M * frz i would like to have more file decriptors inside a vserver (with 2.6 kernel stable release) - how can i do this? 1141832955 M * eyck I made a few 1141832959 M * eyck very nice... 1141832964 M * eyck I made few, even. 1141832975 M * Bertl frz: what is your current limit? 1141832992 M * frz ulimit -n - tells me 1024 1141832996 M * Bertl frz: and is it a context resource limit or ulimit? 1141833006 M * Bertl frz: ah, so ulimit, I assume 1141833016 M * Bertl frz: what limits do you have on the host? 1141833084 M * frz ulimit -a inside vserver tells me : open files (-n) 1024 - and thats not enough 1141833102 M * Bertl and on the host, as root, what do you get there? 1141833113 M * frz on the main or inside vserver 1141833120 M * frz same 1141833164 M * eyck on the master vserver you probably set it yourself with pam, 1141833190 M * eyck or sth 1141833197 M * phycho eyck - you still got one? 1141833207 M * Bertl frz: so I assume that your host (physical server) already limit that to 1024 1141833223 M * Bertl frz: lifting that limit, or changing it for the guest should help 1141833269 M * eyck phycho: hmm, grsec+vs? yeah, probably somewhere in the archives... but it's not current, against ~2.4.19 or sth.. I moved to openwall and am generally way happier person since. 1141833274 M * eyck my hair got better 1141833277 M * eyck not to mention sex life 1141833295 M * frz i try 1141833333 M * phycho k 1141833342 M * phycho haha 1141833374 M * eyck frz: look at your /etc/security/limits.conf, and also into startup scripts..., (on master v) 1141833376 M * phycho ive found an old grsecurity version 1141833508 M * Bertl http://team.lea-linux.org/bgigon/vserver/ 1141833516 M * phycho http://www.felinemenace.org/~andrewg/stuff/grsec+vserver/ 1141833517 M * phycho found one 1141833535 M * frz oki - i will tell you when success :) thx alot 1141833560 M * phycho Be careful, grsecurity 2.1.1 has a security hole with certain grsec configurations. 1141833560 M * phycho Use DaPhreak's patch : 1141833561 M * phycho lol 1141833563 M * phycho how ironic!! 1141833620 M * Bertl frz: you're welcome! btw, check out the ulimit settings for the guest config, contrary to the documentation they should be supported 1141834212 Q * frz Remote host closed the connection 1141834240 J * frz ~frzzzz100@jaim.at 1141834348 M * Bertl wb frz! 1141834520 Q * baggins Quit: leaving 1141834588 M * harry first production server is in! :) 1141834609 M * harry phycho: http://harry.ulyssis.org/vserver 1141834611 M * Bertl harry: congrats! 1141834649 M * harry Bertl: tnx ;) 1141835192 Q * ||Cobra|| Remote host closed the connection 1141835209 M * SiD3WiNDR harry: did you find what was causing the securetty stuff? 1141835248 M * harry yes 1141835253 M * phycho harry - you manage to do those for 2.4? 1141835262 M * harry a many times broken down base-config 1141835273 M * harry no shadow passwords etc... 1141835278 M * harry just... weirdness :) 1141835280 M * harry all fixed now 1141835291 M * harry phycho: havent tried... sr 1141835292 M * harry y 1141835329 M * phycho k 1141835733 M * SiD3WiNDR :-) 1141835753 M * SiD3WiNDR that's something I do notice on new vservers though (at least on debian) 1141835756 M * SiD3WiNDR shadow is turned off 1141835779 M * h01ger run "shadowconfig on" 1141835785 M * SiD3WiNDR yes, I know that 1141835790 M * SiD3WiNDR I just think it should be default on ;) 1141835801 M * SiD3WiNDR cause I tend to forget that and only notice it after a month 1141835818 M * h01ger thats really no vserver issue.. (to configure the system..) 1141835863 J * stefani ~stefani@superquan.apl.washington.edu 1141836084 M * Bertl welcome stefani! 1141836164 M * stefani salut 1141836547 J * matt1 ~matta@c-68-32-239-173.hsd1.pa.comcast.net 1141836832 Q * phycho Quit: 1141836914 Q * matta Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141837023 M * doener Bertl: sendfile patch here: http://www.13thfloor.at/~doener/vserver/patches/delta-sendfile-fix.diff 1141837042 M * doener (in case that you don't like to extract it from the email) 1141837046 M * Bertl doener: tx! 1141837061 M * doener np 1141837141 M * SiD3WiNDR h01ger: no, it isn't, but a default debian install does enable it automatically ;) 1141837154 M * SiD3WiNDR and the "evil" debian vserver scripts did ask that question too ;) 1141837174 M * SiD3WiNDR but yes, it's become a habit to to some copying of files, tzconfig, shadowconfig, etc upon new vserver creation ;) 1141837206 M * h01ger SiD3WiNDR, a default install does. a default debootstrap "installation" not. 1141837225 M * h01ger (which doesnt change anything that this is a bug..) 1141837252 M * SiD3WiNDR indeed 1141838579 M * Bertl doener: details? did we (I?) miss that when adding the sendfile fixes? 1141838883 M * doener Bertl: seems like ;) those changes are the only to sendfile from 2.6.15 to 2.6.16-rc5 1141838914 J * fwl ~fwl@83-215-237-1.seek.stat.salzburg-online.at 1141838946 M * doener i didn't check verify_rw_area to see what was changed there 1141838981 M * Bertl wb fwl! 1141839505 J * bonbons ~bonbons@83.222.39.180 1141839659 M * Bertl welcome bonbons! 1141840001 M * bonbons Hi Bertl 1141840902 M * blizz heyho everybody 1141840924 M * Bertl welcome blizz! 1141841530 Q * frz Read error: Connection reset by peer 1141841583 J * frz ~frzzzz100@jaim.at 1141841624 Q * frz Remote host closed the connection 1141841677 J * frz ~frzzzz100@jaim.at 1141841771 Q * frz Remote host closed the connection 1141841813 J * frz ~frzzzz100@jaim.at 1141841829 Q * frz Remote host closed the connection 1141841874 J * frz ~frzzzz100@jaim.at 1141841886 P * frz 1141842535 Q * coocoon Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141842854 J * exp[a] USERNAME@eserv.comex.ru 1141842865 M * Bertl welcome exp[a]! 1141842874 M * FaUl welcome bertl! :-) 1141842885 M * Bertl hey FaUl! :) 1141843107 J * coocoon ~coocoon@p54A073D2.dip.t-dialin.net 1141843211 M * Bertl okay, off for a while now ... back later ... 1141843219 N * Bertl Bertl_oO 1141843447 J * phycho ~phycho@ext-gw.darktech.org.uk 1141843451 M * phycho harry 1141843453 M * phycho you around? 1141843959 M * Snow-Man Does apache2 use sendfile by default? 1141844023 M * daniel_hozac yes. 1141844041 M * Snow-Man Dangit. 1141844046 M * Snow-Man So I need that sendfile patch. :/ 1141844070 J * shedi ~siggi@inferno.lhi.is 1141844077 M * daniel_hozac you could just disable it in the configuration. 1141844274 M * Snow-Man err, wait, except it's working atm... 1141844284 M * Snow-Man When was the bug introduced? 1141844466 M * doener Snow-Man: somewhere between 2.6.15 and 2.6.16-rc5... (well, the bug is in the vserver patch as it doesn't deal correctly with the change) 1141844470 Q * coocoon Quit: KVIrc 3.2.0 'Realia' 1141844473 M * Snow-Man hrmpf. 1141844479 M * Snow-Man ok. 1141844601 M * harry phycho: yes 1141844704 M * harry pm :) 1141845674 Q * hijacker Quit: Leaving 1141845784 Q * exp[a] Read error: Connection reset by peer 1141846445 J * doener_ ~doener@i5387D174.versanet.de 1141846855 Q * doener Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141847221 J * chirp ~chirp@202-169-194-76.megapass.world-net.co.nz 1141847252 Q * fwl Quit: This computer has gone to sleep 1141847269 J * fwl ~fwl@83-215-237-1.seek.stat.salzburg-online.at 1141847297 Q * fwl Quit: 1141847838 J * Geert geert@geert.irssi.be 1141848279 Q * chirp Quit: Leaving 1141848754 Q * phycho Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141851729 Q * Hollow Quit: SIGTERM 1141851747 Q * bonbons Quit: Leaving 1141851764 J * Hollow ~hollow@home.xnull.de 1141851900 J * phycho ~phycho@ext-gw.darktech.org.uk 1141851903 M * phycho hey harry 1141851906 M * phycho just to let you know 1141851908 M * phycho it works fine 1141851910 M * phycho =) haha 1141854571 J * Aiken ~james@tooax6-082.dialup.optusnet.com.au 1141857197 Q * phycho Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141857973 J * dearaujo ~dan@cpe-66-25-189-193.austin.res.rr.com 1141858315 M * dearaujo With the SET_UTSNAME flag present, I assume the Context can change only change its utsname - not the hosts? 1141858397 M * dearaujo ie, what held in /proc.../cvirt? 1141858418 P * stefani I'm Parting (the water) 1141858692 M * mugwump dearaujo: yes. in fact the hostname being virtualised is compulsory and not possible to ever change the host's AFAIK 1141858731 M * dearaujo great - wanted to make sure I understood that correctly 1141858735 M * dearaujo mugwump: thanks 1141858848 P * dearaujo 1141858913 J * phycho ~phycho@ext-gw.darktech.org.uk 1141859235 Q * lilalinux Remote host closed the connection 1141859580 N * Bertl_oO Bertl 1141859585 M * Bertl evening folks! 1141859640 M * doener_ evening Bertl! 1141860147 M * mugwump hey Bertl 1141860160 M * mugwump I tried to post a submission the other day, but it didn't make it to LKML 1141860168 M * mugwump did you get that e-mail? 1141860208 M * Bertl the two part one? 1141860210 M * mugwump yeah 1141860222 A * mugwump waits for the "no, never heard of it" response 1141860255 M * mugwump I didn't think LKML was moderated 1141860384 Q * phycho Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1141860385 M * mugwump perhaps posts from non-members are, and this one was dropped. maybe I'll just make those posts from my own address 1141860388 M * doener_ there are some rules for it, like the 100k size limit 1141860414 M * mugwump I have been using the catalyst address for the submissions to honour that they're paying me to work on this 1141860422 M * doener_ but AFAIK that's done by the ml software, no moderation 1141860424 M * mugwump well, they're paying me, and I'm working on this ;) 1141860601 M * Bertl mugwump: probably your host has no reverse or is on some blacklist 1141860637 M * Bertl mail1.catalyst.net.nz (godel.catalyst.net.nz [202.78.240.40]) 1141860660 M * Bertl you should make both, forward and reverse show the same name 1141860763 M * mugwump are you sure? my normal posts make it, and my other account has the same thing going on 1141860797 M * mugwump watts.utsl.gen.nz ([202.78.240.73]:35240 "EHLO mail.utsl.gen.nz") 1141860832 M * Bertl yeah, but your headers are usually more complicated, i.e. 1141860837 M * Bertl Received: from [127.0.0.1] (longdrop.watts.utsl.gen.nz [192.168.255.49]) 1141860873 M * Bertl which looks like it 'came' from a host in watts.utsl.gen.nz 1141860885 M * mugwump right, which doesn't exist from the outside 1141860926 M * Bertl but there is a way to check such stuff for kernel.org 1141860929 J * comfrey ~comfrey@h-64-105-87-234.sttnwaho.covad.net 1141860936 M * Bertl welcome comfrey! 1141860957 M * Bertl mugwump: just check the web pages, they have a test option somewhere 1141861223 M * mugwump hmm weird. 1141861256 M * mugwump well, what I'm going to try to do next is port the next patch in my series (/proc hooks) on top of ebiederm's proc refactoring 1141861396 Q * meandtheshell Quit: bye bye ... 1141861921 J * phycho ~phycho@ext-gw.darktech.org.uk 1141861931 M * Bertl wb phycho!