1129075227 M * mugwump LVM, or mount -o loop 1129075497 M * Johnsie Yeah, I'd have to agree. 1129075511 M * Johnsie Took me a few days to get comfortable with LVM, but once you learn it, if you haven't already, it's nice. 1129075812 M * mnemoc has anyone measured lvm overhead? 1129075884 M * mugwump mnemoc: that would be a very hard thing to measure :) Not least because the overhead is so small 1129075924 M * mugwump however you do lose a little space, of the order of megabytes, in the meta-data 1129075944 M * mnemoc i don't feel the overhead, 2-3 years using it.... just curious :) 1129075977 M * mnemoc 1.5-2 i guess 1129076015 M * mnemoc i love lvm :) 1129076068 M * daniel_hozac http://www.suse.com/en/whitepapers/lvm/lvm1.html tables at the bottom ;) 1129076092 M * mnemoc .oO( suse everywhere )o 1129076278 M * mnemoc thanks a lot daniel_hozac, that's what i was looking for 1129077444 Q * lilo Remote host closed the connection 1129077794 J * lilo ~lilo@lilo.usercloak.oftc.net 1129078125 J * gndmstr ~gndmstr@ip1.pathworx.sbbsnet.net 1129078194 M * gndmstr LVM question if anyone knows about it. I have my lvm system all set up and mounted. The manual says before rebooting unmount them then run vgchange -a n then reboot. is this just a 'first time' safety or must it be run every reboot? 1129078246 M * gndmstr i would assume the kernel and other systems would be smart enough to take care of lvm mounts and unmounts under normal operation 1129078264 M * mugwump even if you reboot with the reset switch it doesn't often get confused 1129078281 M * gndmstr decided to put my guests into individual lvms.. 1129078282 M * gndmstr ahh ok 1129078285 M * daniel_hozac your distribution ought to have an LVM script (or have it integrated into the usual sysinit/halt script). 1129078296 M * gndmstr so then that one time is just a cleanup thing 1129078298 M * gndmstr gentoo 1129078315 M * gndmstr the instructions make no mention of it but ill double check things before i do the first reboot 1129078667 M * mnemoc modprobe dm-mod; -ay --ignorelockingfailure should be enough 1129078714 M * mnemoc modprobe dm-mod; vgchange -ay --ignorelockingfailure 1129078857 M * gndmstr ok thanks.. kernel's monolithic but that would still work.. after that one time i shouldnt have to run it again as the kernel and support code will care for it normally right 1129079267 J * Aiken_ ~james@tooax8-035.dialup.optusnet.com.au 1129079462 M * mnemoc gndmstr: [ -e /dev/mapper/control ] will tell you if dm-mod is active 1129079621 Q * Aiken Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129079633 M * gndmstr ok. its active. figured it would be being built into the kernel.. long as i dont have to run that vgchange every shutdown or reboot things are ok :) 1129079698 J * litage ~nick@203.220.55.70 1129082162 M * FireEgl mnemoc: ello.. Was curious if you ever tried to merge recent grsecurity and vserver patches to apply to 2.6.13.3? 1129082306 M * mnemoc to 2.6.11.12 1129082387 M * mnemoc using svk i was able to merge it, vs-pax and vs-grsec... and after some hackery i got them compiling, but never tried them on runtime 1129082430 M * FireEgl mnemoc: I want your patch please! =) 1129082477 M * mnemoc let me find a working copy... i removed the .svk/ dir with the repo on a day of angry 1129082489 M * FireEgl -/ 1129082491 M * FireEgl =/ 1129082531 M * mnemoc i decided to use rsbac in future, and soon i'll replace the machine i have with old vs/grsec 1129082579 M * gndmstr im off to bed early ... see everyone later and thanks!! 1129082590 Q * gndmstr Remote host closed the connection 1129083964 M * FireEgl mnemoc: There's already a 2.6.11.12-vs2.0rc4-grsec2.1.6 patch here.. http://team.lea-linux.org/bgigon/vserver/mirror/ If that's what you have, then I was hoping for something newer.. =/ 1129084036 M * mnemoc oh, does that work? 1129084045 M * mnemoc what is almost what i did by hand 1129084064 M * mnemoc that is quite easy to update 1129084065 M * FireEgl I haven't tried it.. cuz it's so old.. hehe 1129084089 M * mnemoc grsec is last release 1129084099 M * mnemoc linux, the last version i turst 1129084108 M * mnemoc vs, old but not that much 1129084156 M * mnemoc thanks a lot for the link ;) 1129084529 M * FireEgl How hard would it be to make a 2.6.12.4-vs2.0-grsec2.1.6 patch? (I'd actually prefer bleeding edge..2.6.13.3-vs2.1.0rc4-grsec2.1.7cvs though) 1129084553 N * nokoya nokoya- 1129084726 M * mnemoc grsec2.1.7cvs is the harder part because spender changes are imposible to track and you one have interdiff 1129084879 M * FireEgl So what about 2.6.12.4-vs2.0-grsec2.1.6? Would it be much trouble? 1129084900 M * mnemoc almost trivial ;) 1129084919 M * FireEgl =D I would really like it... If you don't mind making it.. 1129084929 M * mnemoc starting from that patch you have :) 1129084976 M * mnemoc i'm quite busy these days, but i'll try 1129084995 M * mnemoc i guess to 2.6.13.3 1129085016 M * mnemoc 2.6.12 is in the middle of nowhere :p 1129085065 M * FireEgl =) 1129085415 N * Bertl_oO Bertl 1129085431 M * Bertl *phew* that was longer than expected ... 1129085497 M * Bertl FireEgl: you could even patch up to 2.0.1 or 2.1.0 from there ... I'd say ... 1129085584 M * FireEgl I guess I need to learn C.. and how to do complex diff'ing and patch'ing.. =/ 1129085594 J * locksy ~locksy@mrtg.sisgroup.com.au 1129085709 M * Bertl welcome locksy! 1129085714 M * mnemoc Bertl: hi, what version control system do you use to maintain vserver? 1129085732 M * Bertl cp -la :) 1129085770 A * Bertl .o( klingon cvs :) 1129085792 M * FireEgl hehe 1129085850 M * mnemoc svk is very cool doing merges :) 1129085910 M * daniel_hozac didn't mugwump say git seemed like an even better merger? 1129085995 M * Bertl yes, I just don't know what I'd need merging for anyway ... 1129086048 M * mnemoc you would get your deltas out of the box ;) 1129086070 M * Bertl deltas between what? 1129086083 M * mnemoc vserver 'steps' 1129086092 M * mnemoc changesets :\ 1129086098 M * Bertl I have them, no need to 'get' them 1129086189 M * mnemoc you don't have an splitted 2.1.0-rc4, using a something to keep control of changesets you would have. and updating from one linux version to another would be easier 1129086245 M * mnemoc daniel_hozac: how fat are git 'storages'? 1129086293 M * Bertl mnemoc: splitted based on what? 1129086316 M * mnemoc on your commits 1129086350 M * Bertl every change I did (i.e. the rc*) are present as trees 1129086363 M * daniel_hozac mnemoc: no idea, as i've never used anything but CVS or Subversion. 1129086393 M * Bertl mnemoc: if you want the steps as single patches, you can find them here: http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/ 1129086420 M * Bertl (see delta) 1129086448 M * Bertl not al of them are public, though 1129086508 M * Bertl but not the changes are interesting, the FOR-* patches are actually what you want to get ... and I don't see how you would get these from a CVS, for example 1129086529 M * mnemoc CVS no 1129086539 M * mnemoc but yes from any 'changeset' based 1129086579 M * Bertl would not work, unless the 'changeset based' whatever completely replace me :) 1129086602 M * mnemoc nope, you control it ;) 1129086610 M * mnemoc and we ask him what you did :p 1129086623 M * micah ahhh, I finally have a working system 1129086653 M * Bertl mnemoc: ah, now you are referring to changelogs or commit messages, yes? 1129086672 M * micah i've had a power supply fail, two hard drives fail, a cdrom fail, a usbkey device die, and my laptop die all in the last week 1129086683 M * micah dont let me near your computer 1129086686 M * daniel_hozac micah: wow. 1129086697 M * micah daniel_hozac: it has been... fun 1129086706 M * daniel_hozac i bet. 1129086781 M * Bertl micah: you should not use the flamethrower to solder a wire :) 1129086808 M * mnemoc Bertl: a changelog, is a set of diffs to different files, and one commit message, all together as a single unit. 1129086811 M * mnemoc changeset* 1129086841 M * Bertl yes, the problem is, I would not write any commit messages 1129086850 M * mnemoc ok :) 1129086886 M * Bertl that's why I _try_ to make the patches obvious :) 1129086918 M * Bertl (and of course, not grouped/sorted by time/changes, but by category and kind of change) 1129086961 M * Bertl but I checked git some time back and it looked like something which might become useful in the future ... 1129086976 M * Bertl especially as cogito seems to take away the ugly details ... 1129087028 M * Bertl and mugwump? was right, the way I manage my trees is very similar to the git storage 1129087121 M * mnemoc :) 1129087454 M * Bertl mnemoc: what kind of information are you missing (regarding the patches/changes) 1129087488 M * mnemoc actually nothing i guess 1129087524 M * mnemoc i have to free most HD space to make the branches again ;) 1129087615 M * Bertl that's where the cp -la comes handy :) 1129087664 M * mnemoc if you don't forget to unlink them before changing ;) 1129087687 M * Bertl no, actually my editor (vim) does that for me :) 1129087710 M * mnemoc vi does that? oh 1129087723 M * Bertl if told to do so, yes :) 1129087807 M * mnemoc :) 1129088712 M * Aiken_ that is where the the cow stuff would come in handy 1129088738 M * Bertl yep 1129088932 J * sebi ~sebi@Fd01b.f.strato-dslnet.de 1129088949 M * Bertl welcome sebi! 1129089039 Q * sebi_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129089505 M * mnemoc cogito looks very friendly 1129089564 M * mnemoc git itself looks more ugly than tla 1129090490 M * Bertl okidoki ... I'm off to bed now ... back tomorrow ... 1129090497 N * Bertl Bertl_zZ 1129090500 M * mnemoc gn8 Bertl_zZ 1129090696 Q * FireEgl Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129091985 Q * litage Remote host closed the connection 1129092299 J * litage ~nick@203.220.55.70 1129093676 J * stefani ~stefani@c-24-19-46-211.hsd1.wa.comcast.net 1129093680 P * stefani 1129095666 J * jayeola ~jayeola@host-87-74-35-59.bulldogdsl.com 1129097590 J * Aiken__ ~james@tooax7-193.dialup.optusnet.com.au 1129097943 Q * Aiken_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129097979 Q * litage Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129098478 J * litage ~nick@203.220.55.70 1129101896 Q * litage Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129102159 Q * Aiken__ Quit: Leaving 1129102488 J * litage ~nick@203.220.55.70 1129103626 J * Cyborg771 YankidankU@S01060001805241e7.vs.shawcable.net 1129103634 M * Cyborg771 Hello? 1129103650 P * Cyborg771 1129105108 J * prae ~prae@ezoffice.mandriva.com 1129106762 Q * [MUPPETS]Gonzo Remote host closed the connection 1129111786 J * calum ~calum@82-69-161-141.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 1129111910 M * calum Hello all. I'm seeing lots of these in the host syslog since I upgraded the kernel. "kernel: VM: killing process maxlifetime" (and various other VM errors/alerts). Is this just standard rlimit stuff, or have I ticked a box in the kernel config that I shouldn't have - Enable Hard CPU Limits for example, or Limit the IDLE task 1129113458 N * nokoya- nokoya 1129113703 J * erwan_taf ~erwan@81.80.43.77 1129113708 P * erwan_taf 1129114020 N * Loki|muh_ Loki|muh 1129114641 Q * monrad Quit: Leaving 1129116198 Q * flock Remote host closed the connection 1129116277 J * flock ~restless@l192-117-111-12.broadband.actcom.net.il 1129116303 Q * flock Remote host closed the connection 1129117230 J * flock ~restless@l192-117-111-12.broadband.actcom.net.il 1129117297 J * Ben81 ~Ben81@tipi0e.lri.fr 1129117870 Q * yungyuc Remote host closed the connection 1129117997 J * mrec_ ~revenger@p54B02E76.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 1129118307 Q * mrec Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129118962 J * yungyuc ~yungyuc@220-135-53-220.HINET-IP.hinet.net 1129119305 Q * flock Remote host closed the connection 1129121209 J * dddd44 dhb55@60.49.78.240 1129122883 J * Doener ~doener@i5387EDAE.versanet.de 1129123960 J * sebi_ ~sebi@Fd5a3.f.strato-dslnet.de 1129124069 Q * sebi Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129125843 Q * jayeola Quit: leaving 1129126080 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl 1129126145 M * Bertl calum: a) what is your kernel/tool version b) waht are your ulimits/rlimits c) what are the precise messages? 1129126164 M * Bertl morning folks! 1129126238 M * cehteh hi Bertl 1129126273 M * cehteh mhm how far is the openmosix team with 2.6 .. and where there efforts to apply vserver and omosix recently? 1129126709 M * Bertl no idea about the openmosix status (haven't checked for some time) 1129126757 M * Bertl about combining linux-vserver and openmosix: I think it is doable, but it will need some adaptations ... but I doubt that the result would be worth it ... 1129126783 M * mnemoc Bertl: do you still have 2.0-rc4 patch somewhere? 1129126830 M * Bertl http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/{OUTDATED,OBSOLETE} 1129126924 M * Bertl cehteh: last time I looked @ openmosix, they still had the 'head node' principle ... which means: all I/O is done on the same node you started the process ... 1129126926 M * mnemoc thanks 1129126934 M * cehteh yes 1129126967 M * cehteh well was just some idea about having a frontend vserver .. and adding processors to the back dynamically via mosix 1129126976 M * cehteh that wont scale for webserver like tasks 1129126986 P * mynick 1129126996 M * cehteh was just an idea anyways 1129127064 M * Bertl i.c. well in most cases it turned out that it's easier to do 'poor mans' load balancing with more machines (each running a fraction of the total guests, ready to start new ones, if one 'node' goes donw) 1129127086 M * mnemoc ipvs/keepalived performes nice 1129127107 M * Bertl cehteh: but I'm not against *mosix like ideas/solutions in combination with linux-vserver 1129127109 M * cehteh yes you are right 1129127144 M * cehteh i was just interested if some did that ... would be a funny thing 1129127211 M * cehteh i have only a stone age vserver running .. want to reinstall and update it when i have some time 1129127239 M * cehteh aka kernel was build 2001 1129127571 M * Bertl well, linux-vserver has tradition ... :) 1129127586 M * Bertl okay, off for a bath .. 1129127593 N * Bertl Bertl_oO 1129128649 J * liquid3649 ~liquid@p54975BF7.dip.t-dialin.net 1129128771 M * calum Hello Bertl_oO 1129128891 M * calum 2.6.12.4 + patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff. util-vserver-0.30.205-r1. I am using nproc 500 (which never gets anywhere near), as 256000 (which never gets anywhere near), and rss either 32768 or 65536. 1129128921 M * calum $ grep VM /var/log/syslog | tail -n 10 1129128921 M * calum Oct 12 10:53:37 www1 kernel: VM: killing process bash 1129128921 M * calum Oct 12 10:53:37 www1 kernel: VM: killing process apache2 1129128921 M * calum Oct 12 11:02:01 www1 kernel: VM: killing process sh 1129128921 M * calum Oct 12 11:02:01 www1 kernel: VM: killing process sh 1129128922 M * calum Oct 12 11:03:38 www1 kernel: VM: killing process apache2 1129128923 M * calum Oct 12 11:09:01 www1 kernel: VM: killing process maxlifetime 1129128925 M * calum Oct 12 11:39:01 www1 kernel: VM: killing process sh 1129128927 M * calum Oct 12 11:39:01 www1 kernel: VM: killing process sh 1129128929 M * calum Oct 12 11:56:37 www1 kernel: VM: killing process bash 1129128931 M * calum Oct 12 11:57:05 www1 kernel: VM: killing process bash 1129129120 M * mnemoc uhm 1129129452 Q * yungyuc Remote host closed the connection 1129129467 J * yungyuc ~yungyuc@220-135-53-220.HINET-IP.hinet.net 1129129608 M * liquid3649 hi 1129129966 M * liquid3649 is it possible to run bind in an vserver? 1129130302 M * mnemoc Bertl_oO: is delta-bme-feat01.patch yours? 1129130862 M * liquid3649 i tried to start bind in a vserver and got "named: capset failed: Operation not permitted: please ensure that the capset kernel module is loaded." do i need to set something in capabilities to get capset? 1129131664 M * mnemoc liquid3649: compile your bind with linux capabilities disabled 1129131690 M * liquid3649 ok will try that 1129131693 M * liquid3649 thx 1129131709 M * mnemoc configure --disable-linux-caps 1129131719 Q * lilo Remote host closed the connection 1129131852 M * cehteh or give the vserver the nesseary capabilities 1129132013 J * stefani ~stefani@superquan.apl.washington.edu 1129132016 M * liquid3649 and how could i give it? 1129132067 J * lilo ~lilo@lilo.usercloak.oftc.net 1129132183 M * mnemoc as you give all other capabilities 1129132520 M * liquid3649 in /etc/vserver/dns/flags or bcapabilities ? 1129132592 M * mnemoc bcapabilities 1129133751 J * Blissex pcg@82-69-39-138.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk 1129134948 Q * Ben81 Quit: Leaving 1129135354 Q * prae Quit: Execute Order 69 ! 1129137692 J * monrad ~monrad@213083190134.sonofon.dk 1129138899 Q * Blissex Read error: Connection reset by peer 1129139688 J * samuel_ ~samuel@Quebec-HSE-ppp242189.qc.sympatico.ca 1129139693 M * samuel_ howdy 1129139726 M * samuel_ hey, why even if my vserver are using dummyN as dev, I see traffic on loopback? 1129139742 M * samuel_ (tcpdump -i dummy0 nothing... tcpdump -i lo I got the traffic...) 1129139758 Q * liquid3649 Quit: Verlassend 1129139786 M * Hollow samuel_: guests will always use loopback, as the traffic is local 1129139817 M * Hollow at least connections between host & guest 1129139831 M * samuel_ ok 1129139853 M * samuel_ so, using dummyN are useless 1129140366 M * mnemoc are guests without any limit set, limited? 1129140456 J * FireEgl Proteus266@adsl-147-82-252.bhm.bellsouth.net 1129140927 J * lilo_ ~lilo@lilo.usercloak.oftc.net 1129140962 Q * lilo Killed (NickServ command used by lilo_) 1129140969 N * lilo_ lilo 1129141708 J * patulon ~patulon@host22.201-252-2.telecom.net.ar 1129141737 M * patulon Hi everybody !, i have a question about the showattr 1129141930 M * patulon is there anybody out there ? 1129141961 M * daniel_hozac just ask ;) 1129142235 M * patulon thank you, I have the following vroutix:/home# showattr -d vservers 1129142236 M * patulon ---BuiX vservers 1129142256 M * patulon the thing is what that the final "X" mean ? 1129142535 M * patulon I mean, I've read in the docs and its supposed to have just ---Bui- 1129142548 M * patulon But I have ---BuiX ! 1129143069 M * daniel_hozac i have no idea. i've never seen that before... 1129143213 M * daniel_hozac ah, i think it's xid tagged. 1129143475 M * daniel_hozac try lsxid -d /vservers to see what xid it's tagged with. 1129143739 J * liquid3649 ~liquid@p54975BF7.dip.t-dialin.net 1129143882 M * patulon lsxid -d /home/vservers 1129143888 M * patulon 0 /home/vservers 1129143928 M * patulon is that correct ?. Could it generate problems ? 1129144488 Q * samuel_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129145553 Q * yungyuc Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129145822 M * daniel_hozac well, a 0 xid shouldn't be a problem. 1129146034 M * micah arg, i made a 2.4.31 kernel and it doesn't seem to have the module for my drive in the initrd ;p 1129146302 M * patulon is it supposed that the /home/vserver has to be a physical partition ?, in my case its just a directory inside the /home. And /home its an md device, and i'm having some strange problems... 1129146583 Q * liquid3649 Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129147697 M * patulon do you know if the quota/context supports reiserfs ? 1129147747 M * daniel_hozac disk limits or quota? 1129148046 M * patulon I'm not sure... I'm using this command to manage disk usage: 1129148049 M * patulon vdlimit --xid $context --set space_total=$quota_disk --set space_used=`du -s /home/vservers/$i/ | awk '{print $1}'` --set ino..... 1129148053 M * patulon etc... 1129148056 N * Bertl_oO Bertl 1129148060 M * Bertl evening folks! 1129148069 M * patulon is it quota or disk limit ? 1129148069 M * Bertl mnemoc: yes :) 1129148096 M * mnemoc Bertl: yes to bme or to limit? 1129148101 M * Bertl patulon: that we call disk-limits ... 1129148118 M * mnemoc moin Bertl ;) 1129148119 M * patulon ok, disk limits... and is it possible to use it with reiserfs ? 1129148143 M * Bertl mnemoc: hmm, only saw one directed question (which was about bme :) 1129148164 M * Bertl patulon: yes, with recent patches, reiserfs is supported 1129148192 M * patulon ok, thank you, may I tell you something taht happened to me ? 1129148257 M * mnemoc Bertl: ;-) ... is it part of 2.0? 1129148297 M * Bertl mnemoc: no, but 2.1 1129148352 M * Bertl patulon: sure, go ahead! 1129148355 M * mnemoc it is part of a recient combined vserver-grsec patch FireEgl found 1129148378 M * Bertl make sense, probably based on gentoo or so ... 1129148414 M * patulon ok, here is the story, I don't know if I did something wrong, so if I made a mistake, please feel free to correct me 1129148436 M * patulon I'm using a 2.6.12-5 kernel 1129148444 M * Bertl debian? 1129148459 M * patulon yes 1129148467 M * patulon with this patch patch-2.6.12.4-vs2.0.diff.bz2 1129148480 M * patulon sarge stable 1129148481 M * Bertl aha, why that? 1129148497 M * Bertl I mean, debian provides a 'custom' vserver kernel, IIRC 1129148530 M * patulon I decided to compile myself to support SMP + Array controler, etc... 1129148537 M * patulon is that wrong ? 1129148577 M * Bertl well, might cause issues, IIRC some debian kernels did not work with the non-debian vserver patches, but let's continue first ... 1129148601 M * patulon ok, but the kernel is from kernel.org compiled from sources 1129148609 M * patulon its a vanilla kernel 1129148616 M * patulon not form apt 1129148631 M * patulon not FROM apt, sorry 1129148636 M * Bertl ah, okay, so actually 2.6.12.5 not 2.6.12-5 :) 1129148655 M * patulon yes, you're right ! jjee 1129148662 M * Bertl np 1129148663 M * patulon vroutix:/usr/src# uname -a 1129148664 M * patulon Linux vroutix 2.6.12.5 #12 SMP Tue Oct 4 13:02:15 ART 2005 i686 GNU/Linux 1129148673 M * patulon ok 1129148707 M * patulon the thing is that when I try to use the tagxid to support disk limits 1129148717 M * patulon I'm using this line in /etc/fstab: 1129148717 M * patulon /dev/md0 /home/vservers auto defaults,tagxid,rw 0 0 1129148735 M * Bertl okay, you did 'mount' it with those options? 1129148746 M * patulon yes, it works 1129148753 M * patulon there is no error message 1129148812 M * patulon the thing is that if I boot with that line (using reiserfs), when I enter into a vserver 1129148827 M * patulon some files are missing :P 1129148859 M * daniel_hozac dynamic context IDs? 1129148862 M * Bertl okay, sounds like an accident with the xid ... 1129148869 M * patulon for example, sometimes you don't have /etc/init.d/rc ... or sometimes when you run apt-update fails to lock /var/lib/.... 1129148878 M * mnemoc what's wrong with dynamic xids? 1129148883 M * Bertl patulon: a) you absolutely need to use static xids for the tagging 1129148893 M * patulon ok, how do I do that ? 1129148904 M * Bertl and b) maybe you change the xid and/or the tagging ... 1129148947 M * Bertl patulon: just create a file 'context' containing a number between 2 and 49151 1129148956 M * patulon I've never configured anything about xids... 1129148959 M * Bertl (in the config tree of your guest) 1129148975 M * patulon inside /etc/vservers/vs00 (if it is the vserver config tree) ? 1129148990 M * patulon and the number has to be unique for vserver ? 1129148996 M * Bertl yes, echo 100 > /etc/vservers/vs00/context 1129149002 M * Bertl as an example ... 1129149008 M * patulon ok, thank you very much !!! 1129149029 M * Bertl you're welcome! .. but 1129149035 M * patulon yeah, tell me 1129149047 M * Bertl IIRC, then vs2.0 does not support the dlimit on reiser 1129149067 M * patulon ok, is it better to use ext3 ? 1129149068 M * Bertl it is supported by the 2.0.1-* and 2.1.0 versions 1129149080 M * patulon I can change, its just a matter of performance 1129149097 M * Bertl whatever you prefer 1129149111 M * Bertl http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.13.2-vs2.0.1-pre2.diff.bz2 1129149119 M * Bertl (this should support it on reiser) 1129149152 M * patulon ok, great, It's seems that you are working hard on it, isn't it ? 1129149177 M * Bertl well, I guess so ... 1129149190 M * Bertl but it's more fun than work actually ... 1129149255 M * patulon Jejee, thank you very much, I'll try to make it works with ext3+ disk limit + fixed context id... 1129149462 M * Bertl that should work out of the box ... yes 1129149517 M * patulon sorry, just to know... the question I made to you, was it "n00bie" ?... 1129149553 M * Bertl do we care? see topic :) 1129149639 M * patulon ok, thank you very much for your support !!!, and apologize my no native english... 1129149902 M * Bertl I'm no native speaker either .. and we managed to communicate ... 1129149917 M * Bertl you're welcome and feel free to hang around ... 1129149985 M * Doener evening Bertl! 1129149993 M * Doener (and the rest of the channel ;) 1129150014 M * Doener did you make any progress with the issue you showed me? 1129150063 M * Doener i didn't find anything useful and this box will probably die soon :( had to lower the fsb frequency to have it half way stable... but i guess/hope that my new hardware will arrive tomorrow :) 1129150067 M * Bertl Doener: evening! and yes, it is considered solved! 1129150073 M * Doener great! 1129150233 M * Bertl http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/delta-2.6.13.3-vs2.1.0-rc3.3-rc3.4.diff 1129150244 M * Bertl (ignore the inline changes and that) 1129150687 M * daniel_hozac Bertl: re: my non-booting SMP kernel, as soon as i remove the vserver patch, it works fine... could you take a peek and see if i made any obvious booboos? 1129150700 M * Doener so we unhash and free the context info a bit earlier, right? 1129150711 M * Bertl daniel_hozac: sure .. 1129150728 M * Bertl Doener: especially we do that always ... 1129150749 M * Bertl (not all pathes lead to the previous location) 1129150781 J * Aiken ~james@tooax8-202.dialup.optusnet.com.au 1129150819 M * Doener Bertl: previous location being unhash_processß 1129150822 M * Doener s/ß/?/ 1129150868 Q * lilo Remote host closed the connection 1129150881 M * Bertl Doener: yep 1129151073 M * daniel_hozac Bertl: http://cvs.hozac.com/viewcvs/*checkout*/kernel/linux-2.6.13-vserver2.0.1.0.pre2.1.patch?root=rpms&rev=1.1 and http://daniel.hozac.com/tmp/vanilla-to-fc.patch for 2.6.13.3 -> FC. 1129151198 J * lilo ~lilo@lilo.usercloak.oftc.net 1129151320 M * Doener good night folks! 1129151322 Q * Doener Quit: Leaving 1129151677 M * Bertl daniel_hozac: and you get absolutely no messages from the kernel boot? 1129151687 M * daniel_hozac Bertl: none whatsoever. 1129151778 M * Bertl but with UP it is fine, and also without the patch? 1129151810 J * flock ~restless@l192-117-111-12.broadband.actcom.net.il 1129151817 M * daniel_hozac yep. 1129151898 M * Bertl I would suggest to revert the HZ stuff first, although I don't see anything obvious ... 1129151934 M * daniel_hozac yeah, i just noticed that... 1129152224 M * patulon Hi, I'm back !!! it worked fine !!! Excelente ! 1129152258 M * Bertl good, once everything is working you might consider adding yourself to the 'Happy Users' page or the 'Provider Page' ... 1129152380 Q * lilo Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1129152950 M * daniel_hozac Bertl: hmm, is CONFIG_KERNEL_HZ used at all in 2.0.1-pre2? 1129152974 M * daniel_hozac i can't find anything but the Kconfig entry. 1129153055 M * Bertl sec 1129153203 M * Bertl hmm, interesting ... yeah, I basically removed it except for the entry 1129153208 J * liquid3649 ~liquid@p54975978.dip.t-dialin.net 1129153428 M * liquid3649 which capability must be set to run bind in a vserver? 1129153452 M * Bertl no additional, if you don't want to recompile bind, see problematic apps 1129153525 M * daniel_hozac CAP_SYS_RESOURCE ;) 1129153870 M * patulon Hi, I have a doubt about how to configure interfaces 1129153900 M * patulon I'd like to have lo -> 127.0.0.1 in every vhost, is it possible ? 1129153933 M * Bertl you have it, but not as interface ... 1129153962 M * Bertl (doesn't make much difference, as 127.0.0.1 is mapped to the first assigned ip) 1129154037 M * liquid3649 thx bind is working 1129154082 M * patulon ok, but in the vhosts if I use ifconfig I see no ip in the eth0 and no lo interface... altough I probed that the vhost uses the correct IP 1129154126 M * Bertl yes, that is because ifconfig is too old to see it (was replace about 6 years ago by 'ip' from 'iproute2' 1129154162 M * Bertl if you want a config which can be seen by ifconfig, just usa aliases (i.e. add the 'name' entry to your interface config) 1129154181 M * patulon ok, if I want to use multiple IPs I know about ip addr add ... 1129154396 M * patulon how is the best configuration method for the IPs of the real server, I mean, I have a block of 16 IPs. Do I use /etc/network/interfaces with eth0:1, etc... ? 1129154501 M * Bertl no, eth0 is the 'dev', '1' would be the 'name' 1129154514 M * Bertl (if you want an alias config, from the guest side) 1129154538 M * Bertl of course, you can alternatively assign all ips on the host, and just 'use' them in the guest(s) 1129154593 M * Bertl okay, I'm off to bed now ... have fun and cya tomorrow! 1129154606 M * patulon ok, thank you very much, cya !!!!! 1129154610 M * Bertl daniel_hozac: will look into your patch in more detail tomorrow 1129154620 N * Bertl Bertl_zZ 1129155101 Q * patulon Quit: 1129155462 Q * liquid3649 Quit: Verlassend 1129155507 M * daniel_hozac Bertl_zZ: thanks. 1129155511 J * ntrs ~ntrs@68-188-50-87.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com 1129157082 J * yungyuc ~yungyuc@220-135-53-220.HINET-IP.hinet.net 1129157183 M * stefani weird thing i am finding with ssh -X to guest. if the guest is "remote" X forwarding is fine. if i ssh to guest on same physical machine (as my workstation) i get "Error can't open display" as if X fwding were not allowed. 1129159516 J * Apothem ~Apothem@66.152.246.213 1129159537 A * Apothem looks at motd 1129159540 M * Apothem I like that.. 1129159550 M * Apothem That's a good way to say RTFW =P 1129159925 P * Apothem 1129160484 Q * litage Quit: Leaving 1129161436 P * stefani I'm Parting (the water)