1106699575 M * chrish01 Bertl_zZ, i found why it segfaulted. its cause kernel is segfaulting ... 1106699580 M * chrish01 Bertl_zZ, http://people.mosaix.net/chris/private/dmesg_output.txt 1106700612 Q * chrish01 Quit: Leaving 1106702233 J * chrish01 ~chrish01@69.90.131.25 1106705432 T * * http://linux-vserver.org/ | latest stable 1.2.10, devel 1.9.{3,4-rc3}, ng8.12 1106705432 T * Bertl - 1106712361 J * DuckKing ~Duck@dyn-83-157-128-92.ppp.tiscali.fr 1106712487 Q * DuckMaster Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106715037 Q * nox Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106715048 J * nox ~vps@c207015.adsl.hansenet.de 1106718122 J * mboman ~michael@cm48.sigma230.maxonline.com.sg 1106721165 Q * nacl Remote host closed the connection 1106723575 J * ntrs ~ntrs@Dardeene-68.188.50.87.charter-stl.com 1106723918 Q * ntrs_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106724158 J * ntrs_ ntrs@Dardeene-68.188.50.87.charter-stl.com 1106724383 Q * ntrs Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106726833 Q * TheSeer uranium.oftc.net oxygen.oftc.net 1106726833 Q * hesus uranium.oftc.net oxygen.oftc.net 1106726906 J * hesus darksoul@pingu.ii.uj.edu.pl 1106726906 J * TheSeer ~theseer@border.office.salesemotion.net 1106728773 J * janek janek@huggz.com 1106728780 N * janek sizo 1106728783 M * sizo hi 1106728837 M * sizo is it possible to assign more than 1 ip address to an vserver 1106729556 N * chrish01 chris|sleep 1106730026 J * prae ~prae@ezoffice.mandrakesoft.com 1106730065 J * chrish01 ~chrish01@69.90.131.25 1106730091 M * prae morning ! 1106730108 M * chrish01 morning prae 1106730421 J * jfm ~jfm@243-103.241.81.adsl.skynet.be 1106730882 J * LiquidBrain ~stroke@ws46.sdnet.co.yu 1106730890 P * LiquidBrain 1106731150 M * mikelcu sizo: yes, the configuration of more than one depends on which version of VS you are running 1106731266 M * mikelcu I can tell you how to do it on kernel 2.6, but I've never done used the 2.4 series, so... 1106731301 M * jfm Some problem to configure and start Webmin in a vserver! Is there a doc somewhere? 1106731311 M * sizo mikelcu: i just found it in the doc. thanks anyway 1106731335 M * mikelcu sure 1106731706 J * Val ~val@gj403.loria.fr 1106731721 M * Val Hi ! :) 1106731850 M * Val ola : here ? :) 1106732157 J * Duckx ~duckx@195.75.27.158 1106732263 J * bro ~vanity@lanparty.lv 1106732288 M * bro morning all 1106732959 M * mikelcu morning 1106733139 M * daniel_hozac jfm: what's the problem? 1106733774 Q * monrad Quit: Leaving 1106734115 M * bro hmm, is it my fault that on 2.6.9-vs1.9.3 i cant get iostat to work? ;/ 1106734169 M * we2by I want to make a vserver. I have a kernel with vserver patched 1106734176 M * we2by 2.6.10-1.741.vs1.9.4.0.rc2.1smp 1106734190 M * we2by what is next to do to make a vserver? 1106734248 M * bro tools instaled? 1106734268 M * daniel_hozac we2by: i just uploaded 2.6.10-1.741.vs1.9.4.0.rc3.1smp ;) 1106734289 M * we2by bro, nope 1106734296 M * we2by what version shold I install? 1106734310 M * we2by daniel_hozac, this one is good enough for now :=) 1106734355 M * bro hmm 1106734388 M * bro dunno where to get tools for beta versions ;< im using 2.6.9 with 1.9.3 myself 1106734632 M * daniel_hozac http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/alpha/ 1106734806 M * we2by daniel_hozac, which one should I use? 1106734827 M * daniel_hozac 0.30.196 1106735060 M * we2by utilities installed 1106735063 M * we2by now what? 1106735084 M * daniel_hozac vserver - build --help ;) 1106735106 M * Doener http://linux-vserver.org/alpha+util-vserver 1106735130 M * Doener back later... 1106735134 N * Doener Doener|gone 1106735275 J * mhepp ~mhepp@r72s22p13.home.nbox.cz 1106735393 Q * serving Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106735597 M * jfm Webmin problem solved: I have reinstall the mdk version in the vserver ==> no problem to acces it 1106735911 M * jfm vserver test enter 1106735911 M * jfm WARNING: can not find configuration, assuming legacy method 1106735911 M * jfm ipv4root is now 192.168.1.52 1106735912 M * jfm chcontext: vc_new_s_context(): Operation not permitted 1106735927 M * jfm Sorry a mistake 1106737665 Q * jfm Remote host closed the connection 1106738614 N * Bertl_zZ Bertl 1106738636 M * Bertl morning folks! 1106738811 M * we2by hi Bertl 1106738823 M * we2by I have my vs kernel and utilities installed 1106738830 M * Bertl congrats! 1106738833 M * we2by what do I do next to create a vserver? 1106738838 M * we2by 2.6.10-1.741.vs1.9.4.0.rc2.1smp 1106738878 M * Bertl util-vserver 0.30.196? 1106738885 M * we2by I have it installed 1106738915 M * we2by yea, that one 1106738943 M * Bertl http://linux-vserver.org/alpha+util-vserver 1106738964 M * Bertl scroll down to 'Vserver creation' 1106738987 M * we2by I see 1106739192 M * bro mornin` Bertl ;> 1106739827 M * bro i wanted to know if it's my fault that on 2.6.9-vs1.9.3 i cant get iostat to work? 1106739838 M * bro any1? 1106739876 M * Bertl hmm ... 1106739882 M * Bertl details? 1106740151 J * Borg_Number_One ~Borg@p50886DF2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 1106740270 M * Borg_Number_One http://irc.13thfloor.at/LOG/LOG_2005-01-14.txt "big brother is watching you". 1106740385 N * Doener|gone Doener 1106740397 M * Doener hi folks 1106740409 M * Bertl morning Doener! 1106740758 M * Borg_Number_One http://vds.pas-mal.com/irclogs/vserver-log.20050126.html 1106740787 M * Borg_Number_One Greetings Mr. "IRC Log" 1106741168 M * Bertl Borg_Number_One: do you ahve a problem? 1106742011 M * Doener Bertl: hey, the wiki-ml works again (since jan 20) 1106742033 M * sizo hi bertl 1106742124 J * serving ~serving@213.186.185.195 1106742653 J * mbucc ~konversat@host-216-153-147-194.spr.choiceone.net 1106742745 M * Bertl Doener: yep, martin fixed it ;) 1106742988 Q * nox Quit: I shouldn't really be here - dircproxy 1.0.5 1106743008 M * Bertl hey sizo! 1106743024 M * Bertl bro: still around? 1106743228 Q * brc Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106743797 M * bro yep 1106743802 M * bro still here 1106743827 M * bro config is the same as in report with kernel panic 1106743843 M * we2by [root@6 jinxi]# vserver cpg build -m apt-rpm --hostname jc.humpmeg.net --netdev eth0 --interface 192.168.3.1/21 --context 42 -- -d fc3 1106743843 M * we2by pkgcfgbase-dir '/vservers/.pkg' does not exists or is invalid 1106743843 M * we2by [root@6 jinxi]# 1106743858 M * we2by what do I do now? 1106743865 M * bro we2by, do u have /vservers directory ? 1106743873 M * we2by I just created it 1106743907 M * Bertl bro: please explain 'can't get iostat to work' 1106743931 M * bro Bertl, oh, i can't get iostat to show me disk i/o status 1106744020 M * bro let's put it this way, it doesn't show me any status bout disks 1106744038 M * Bertl on the host? 1106744042 M * bro nop 1106744046 M * bro on the main server 1106744063 M * Bertl hmm, define 'main server' 1106744123 M * bro hmm, how do u call the main server in which vservers live? 1106744144 M * Bertl the host, where the vservers are usually called 'guestsÄ 1106744150 M * Bertl s/Ä/'/ 1106744190 M * Bertl Linux 2.6.11-rc2-vs1.9.4-rc2 ((none)) 01/26/05 1106744190 M * Bertl avg-cpu: %user %nice %sys %iowait %idle 1106744190 M * Bertl 0.29 0.00 2.43 0.00 97.28 1106744190 M * Bertl Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn 1106744190 M * Bertl hda 2.59 92.70 0.05 3542 2 1106744191 M * bro hmm, judging by vserver-stat output it's beeing called 'root server' 1106744192 M * Bertl hdb 0.03 0.21 0.00 8 0 1106744196 M * Bertl I get this here ... 1106744204 M * Bertl so it looks fine to me ... 1106744237 M * bro keke:~# iostat 1106744238 M * bro Linux 2.6.9-vs1.9.3 (keke) 01/26/05 1106744238 M * bro avg-cpu: %user %nice %sys %idle 1106744238 M * bro 0.94 0.00 0.28 98.78 1106744238 M * bro Device: tps Blk_read/s Blk_wrtn/s Blk_read Blk_wrtn 1106744258 M * Doener hm, that looks like an old iostat... 1106744259 M * bro and nothing follows there 1106744262 M * Bertl # iostat --version 1106744262 M * Bertl sysstat version 5.0.6 1106744273 M * Bertl could it be that your iostat is too old? 1106744283 M * bro hmmm 1106744289 M * bro looks so 1106744295 M * Bertl and do you have /proc mounted? I guess so 1106744297 M * bro it's debian allright ;< 1106744307 M * bro i got 4.0.4 1106744326 M * Bertl let's try with a newer one and see if the issue remains ... 1106744371 M * bro ok 1106744374 M * bro tnx ;> 1106745214 J * _are_ ~are@gateway-dsl.lihas.de 1106745222 M * Bertl welcome _are_! 1106745225 M * _are_ hi 1106745436 J * mbucc_ ~konversat@host-216-153-147-194.spr.choiceone.net 1106745467 M * Bertl wb mbucc_! 1106745479 M * Bertl Doener: you around? 1106745486 M * Doener yup yup 1106745504 M * Bertl I'm investigating the routing issue reported by Holger 1106745700 M * mbucc_ hi 1106745728 Q * mbucc Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106745847 M * we2by Doener, can u help me? 1106745849 M * we2by [root@6 jinxi]# vserver cpg build -m apt-rpm --hostname jc.humpmeg.net --netdev eth0 --interface 192.168.3.1/21 --context 42 -- -d fc3 1106745849 M * we2by pkgcfgbase-dir '/vservers/.pkg' does not exists or is invalid 1106745849 M * we2by [root@6 jinxi]# 1106745861 M * Doener mkdir -p /vservers/.pkg ? 1106745972 M * Doener Bertl: that looks totally strange... though i had something similar when my eth0 and eth1 were in the same net and i used "route" instead of "ip"... but i don't remember what kernel i had back then, and just thought "hm, same net on both interfaces is bad anyway"... 1106746030 M * we2by Doener, I am on FC3 1106746036 M * we2by so apt-get won't work on fc3 1106746119 M * Doener sorry, i don't understand... 1106746135 M * we2by *** rpm-fake-resolver was built with glibc; please do *** 1106746135 M * we2by *** not report errors before trying a dietlibc version. *** 1106746135 M * we2by /usr/local/lib/util-vserver/vapt-get-worker: line 43: exec: apt-get: not found 1106746144 M * we2by apt-get is used on debian 1106746149 M * we2by and I am running fc3 1106746151 M * Doener ah ok... 1106746172 M * Doener fedora uses apt-rpm... 1106746183 M * Doener isn't the executable called apt-get there, too? 1106746188 M * we2by nope 1106746192 M * we2by it is called yum 1106746210 M * Doener yum is the second package management system available on fc3 1106746214 M * Doener s/fc3/fc/ 1106746215 M * we2by ohh 1106746225 M * we2by I should install apt-rpm? 1106746229 M * Doener (don't know about fc3... but at least for fc2 it was) 1106746238 M * Doener i guess that would help ;) 1106746317 J * meebey meebey@meebey.net 1106746372 M * we2by Doener, apt-rpm not found 1106746475 M * ntrs_ I am getting this when trying to use chxid 1106746486 M * ntrs_ vxW: xid=0 did lookup hidden f7420734[#101,17793025] »/vservers/«. 1106746498 M * Doener we2by: what about "apt"? 1106746504 M * ntrs_ getting that in dmesg 1106746578 Q * Borg_Number_One Quit: 1106746637 M * Bertl ntrs_: hmm please elaborate! 1106746646 M * ntrs_ Bertl, anyone? 1106746668 M * we2by Doener, found apt. I am installing it now 1106746675 M * we2by what do i chnage in my command? 1106746680 M * ntrs_ Well, I try to do chxid -c -Rx /vservers/ 1106746701 M * Doener we2by: nothing 1106746716 M * Bertl ntrs_: as who? 1106746729 M * Bertl as root I presume, right? 1106746752 M * Bertl ntrs_: sec, trying to reproduce here ... 1106746758 M * ntrs_ res as root 1106746763 M * ntrs_ res=yes 1106746802 M * ntrs_ this is with 2.6.11-rc2 and 1.9.3-rc3 1106746819 M * ntrs_ and the alpha tools x.x.196 1106746827 M * we2by E: could not open package priority file /usr/local/etc/vservers/cpg/apps/pkgmgmt/base/apt/etc/rpmpriorities 1106746869 M * Bertl ntrs_: looks like a bug ... thanks for reporting ... will look into it right now ... 1106746900 M * ntrs_ after this happens, ll /vservers shows this 1106746902 M * ntrs_ ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? hirvi 1106746903 M * ntrs_ ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? hirvi2 1106746924 M * ntrs_ so it seems it screws up the filesystem or at least the directories and the files in them 1106746927 M * we2by Doener, can't I just use a image file from the web and use it? 1106746951 M * Bertl ntrs_: it's the lookup which is affected, the filesystem should be fine 1106746975 M * Bertl (just to verify it's 1.9.4-rc3, on 2.6.11-rc2, right?) 1106746986 M * ntrs_ Ok, but why does ll show wrong information then? 1106746991 M * ntrs_ yes, correct 1106747005 M * Bertl because it uses (l)stat to get the info, which does a lookup ;) 1106747085 M * ntrs_ Ok, I see. 1106747087 M * Doener we2by: sure you can 1106747111 M * ntrs_ It's weird that nobody reported this earlier. 1106747126 M * we2by Doener, what are the steps I have to take? 1106747127 M * Bertl probably the number of folks using tagxid is really small 1106747133 M * ntrs_ I guess nobody is using tagxid and chxid with the latest version 1106747134 M * ntrs_ Yes. 1106747152 M * Bertl and those who do, did not test recent versions 1106747164 M * Doener we2by: create a config with the skeleton build method, get the image and put the contents into the vserver's root 1106747272 M * we2by Doener, skel build methode? 1106747277 M * we2by :S 1106747287 M * Doener http://linux-vserver.org/alpha+util-vserver 1106747309 M * Doener and vserver - build --help ofc ;) 1106747386 Q * mbucc_ Remote host closed the connection 1106747398 J * mbucc_ ~konversat@host-216-153-147-194.spr.choiceone.net 1106747464 M * Bertl ntrs_: expect a patch in a few minutes ... 1106747478 M * we2by Bertl, u r fast with patches 1106747480 M * ntrs_ Bertl, really, you found the problem this quickly? 1106747488 M * ntrs_ Wow 1106747495 M * Bertl thanks, and yes ... I guess so 1106747508 A * Bertl is testing now ... 1106747649 M * ntrs_ Bertl, maybe you can add this in your automated test, if there are such tests? 1106747680 M * Bertl yes, good idea .. but a good automated testing is still missing :/ 1106747781 M * Bertl http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/RC-1.9.4/delta-xid-fix01.diff 1106747796 M * Bertl (rc4 will be out soo, only difference is this patch, I guess) 1106747804 M * Bertl s/soo/soon/ 1106747961 M * ntrs_ Bertl, ok, will try this now and will report back 1106747969 M * Bertl thanks! 1106748001 M * Val Bertl : hi 1106748018 M * Bertl hey Val! 1106748042 M * Val Bertl : not yet tested 2.4.27 quota functions but kernel with q0.14.1 patch seems to work 1106748052 M * Bertl ntrs_: interesting part is, this issue seems present since 1.9.3.5, and nobody noticed ... 1106748085 M * Val Bertl : i posted wishlist bug to uprgade current debian package 1106748144 M * ntrs_ Bertl, I don't think so. I am running 1.9.3-rc2 and the error doesn't happen 1106748160 M * Bertl Val: i.c. maybe you debian linux-vserver folks should unite or at least work together ... 1106748184 M * Val Bertl : that's it, i posted your patch 1106748193 M * Val the one you made 1106748204 M * Bertl ntrs_: 1.9.3-rc2 is older than 1.9.3.5 ... so it is not unexpected ;) 1106748207 M * Val to be included in next kernel-patch-ctx package 1106748305 M * Loki|muh when I mount something from the host via mount -o bind /vservers/vserver1/tmp /vservers/vserver2/tmp then I see it from the host, but the vserver2 still has its old /tmp... 1106748321 M * Loki|muh do I have to restart the vserver? 1106748399 M * Bertl depends on the config, but usually you ahve to mount it from _within_ the namespace the vserver uses 1106748466 M * Loki|muh how can I do this? 1106748478 M * Doener vnamespace -e mount ... 1106748506 M * Loki|muh ah :) 1106748510 M * Doener the mount tree inside the namespace is the same as it was when you started the vserver 1106748533 Q * mbucc_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106748548 M * Doener i.e.: vserver bla start; mount /dev/hdaX /somewhere; vnamespace -e -> /dev/hdaX is _not_ mounted on /somewhere in this namespace! 1106748562 M * Doener ok, need to go shopping, i'm out of coffee 8-) 1106748569 N * Doener Doener|gone 1106748956 Q * sannes Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106751094 J * sannes ~ace@home.skarby.no 1106753837 J * dchouinard ~dchouinar@142.217.213.125 1106753850 M * Bertl welcome dchouinard! 1106753857 M * dchouinard Hi there 1106753901 M * dchouinard I'm looking for corrent and accurate information on how to implement a vserver (in a sysadmin point of view :) 1106753912 M * dchouinard I already have a proper kernel in place 1106753920 M * Bertl means? 1106753959 M * Bertl (i.e. kernel version, patches, distro, tools?) 1106753977 M * dchouinard I found a lot of information but I only get dead end 1106754001 M * dchouinard I already figure that the vserver-tools >0.28 got different command line argument 1106754018 M * dchouinard But I can't get a fedora 2 vserver in place. 1106754031 M * Bertl so we are talking about 2.4 and 1.2.x here, right? 1106754051 Q * maharaja Remote host closed the connection 1106754069 M * dchouinard a 2.6 kernel with vserver patch 1.9.1 1106754088 M * dchouinard util-vserver-0.29.214 1106754090 M * Bertl hmm, then you probably want the alpha util-vserver tools 1106754100 M * Bertl yes, but latest version is 0.30.196 1106754116 M * Bertl and why 1.9.1? 1106754121 M * dchouinard alpha seems scary 1106754129 M * Bertl current is 1.9.4-rc3 1106754143 M * Bertl 0.29.214 is alpha too, just older ;) 1106754149 M * Bertl http://linux-vserver.org/alpha+util-vserver 1106754162 M * dchouinard I was following the fedora2vserver wiki 1106754183 M * Bertl well, probably outdated as nobody cared to update it ... 1106754302 M * dchouinard I did expect it to work anyway, even with outdated info. 1106754321 M * Bertl well, where is the howto? 1106754333 M * dchouinard Is the alpha+util-vserver wiki is accurate and up to date? 1106754376 M * Bertl usually all pages directly linked from the main page (linux-vserver.org) should contain accurate information 1106754965 J * meek ~lost_eps@64.127.148.103 1106755051 M * meek hi all, is it possible to limit the amount of ram dedicated to or used by a vps ? 1106755478 M * Bertl well, you can limit the RSS of processes belonging to a vserver 1106755490 M * Bertl (RSS being Resident Set Size) 1106755513 M * Bertl but you cannot limit the RAM, as it is shared between all vservers 1106755558 M * Bertl (for example by the buffer and inode caches ...) 1106755646 M * meek ok 1106755682 M * meek thanks 1106755701 M * Bertl you're welcome! 1106755776 J * ntrs ntrs@Dardeene-68.188.50.87.charter-stl.com 1106755797 Q * meek Quit: Leaving 1106755826 M * Bertl wb ntrs! 1106755859 J * a-wing ~a-wing@nataliemh.plus.com 1106755956 M * a-wing hi guys, got a quick (probably stupid) question 1106755993 M * a-wing got a vserver on vs1.24 kernel patch, is it possible to run iptables or similar on it? 1106756016 M * a-wing (just had someone run an irc bot via php/apache) 1106756018 Q * ntrs Read error: Connection reset by peer 1106756023 Q * Val Quit: My damn controlling terminal disappeared! 1106756026 Q * ntrs_ Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106756032 J * ntrs ntrs@Dardeene-68.188.50.87.charter-stl.com 1106756096 Q * sannes Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106756507 M * Bertl a-wing: inside the vserver, no 1106756524 M * Bertl on the host, you can use iptables and friends ... 1106756553 M * a-wing iptables on the host doesn't seem to be blocking the outgoing ports 1106756563 M * a-wing (for the vserver) 1106756577 M * Bertl it does, if your rules are appropriate ... 1106756609 M * Bertl (keep in mind, there is no FORWARDing with linux-vserver) 1106756614 M * a-wing output: DROP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ircd 1106756627 M * a-wing forward: DROP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp dpt:ircd 1106756663 M * Bertl the output rule (if done correctly) will work 1106756671 M * Bertl the forward rule will not 1106756689 M * a-wing must be done incorrectly then :) My boss set it up 1106756733 M * Bertl try on the host with 'telnet somewhere ircd' 1106756776 M * a-wing tried that, it blocks it on the host, just not on the vserver 1106756797 J * maharaja maharaja@ipax.at 1106756833 M * Bertl this is something I strongly disbelieve, unless you have some special rules which ACCEPT the packet before the DROP 1106756839 M * Bertl welcome maharaja! 1106756868 M * a-wing hence my confussion :) 1106756900 M * Bertl there is no special iptables stuff for vs1.24, it 'just' uses the normal tables ... 1106756935 M * Bertl so the decisions and rules there will be handled _identically_ to an unpatched kernel 1106756989 M * a-wing the only accept rules are incoming from local servers 1106757027 M * a-wing and they only other drop lines are on incoming from servers that attempted attacks 1106757113 M * Bertl if you upload the iptables-save output, I can take a look at it ... 1106757252 M * a-wing http://193.110.88.212/out.txt 1106757263 M * a-wing it is there 1106757268 M * Bertl tx 1106757313 J * ntrs_ ~ntrs@Dardeene-68.188.50.87.charter-stl.com 1106757321 Q * ntrs Read error: Connection reset by peer 1106757325 M * a-wing 195.69.95.52 is host, 193.110.88.212 is vserver 1106757338 M * Bertl and for witch vserver IP does what telnet command succeed? 1106757352 M * a-wing .212 1106757354 M * Bertl -A OUTPUT -s 193.110.88.212 -o eth0 -j ACCEPT 1106757365 M * Bertl so this will blindly accept anything ... 1106757370 M * a-wing git, my bosses fault :) 1106757374 M * a-wing thanks :) 1106757378 M * Bertl you're welcome! 1106757441 M * a-wing can you tell I have been fixing hacks for the last 10 hours? :) 1106757459 M * a-wing can't believe I missed that one 1106757467 M * Bertl no, I just see that your coffee isn't strong enough ;) 1106757558 M * a-wing both my kids are sick, so I havn't slept as it is :) 1106757773 M * a-wing right, I'm off to finish up for the day 1106757787 M * a-wing thanks again bertl 1106757812 Q * a-wing Quit: using sirc version 2.211+KSIRC/1.3.11 1106757822 M * Bertl okay, off for now .. back later 1106757828 N * Bertl Bertl_oO 1106759092 Q * _are_ Quit: Disconnecting 1106760827 M * dchouinard I'm sure i'm missing something on the initial setup 1106760847 M * dchouinard Should the /vservers folder be created automaticly? 1106760876 M * Loki|muh i created it by hand 1106760980 M * dchouinard But now my vserver build command complain about the /vservers/.pkg folder 1106760999 M * dchouinard Should I populat that with something? 1106761090 M * dchouinard Ok, I copied all my RPMs in it, so I have some other error message now. 1106761356 M * dchouinard gotta go 1106761359 Q * dchouinard Quit: using sirc version 2.211+KSIRC/1.3.9 1106761796 M * we2by Bertl_oO, u there? 1106761849 M * daniel_hozac the _oO means out of office ;) 1106761985 M * we2by oh 1106761986 M * we2by ty 1106761995 Q * prae Quit: Client exiting 1106762000 M * we2by daniel_hozac, I am trying to make a vserver 1106762010 M * we2by I ran vserver build -m skeleton 1106762027 M * we2by I am trying to use a allready made distro image 1106762034 M * we2by what should I do next? 1106762071 M * daniel_hozac did you extract the distro image? 1106762077 M * we2by nope 1106762079 M * we2by not yet 1106762144 M * daniel_hozac and didn't Doener tell you what to do earlier today? 1106762180 M * we2by yea, but I lost it 1106762186 N * Doener|gone Doener 1106762191 M * we2by hi Doener 1106762197 M * we2by I ran vserver build -m skeleton 1106762213 M * we2by what is next to do if I want to use an allready made distro image? 1106762214 M * Doener http://irc.13thfloor.at/LOG/LOG_2005-01-26.txt 1106762233 M * Doener extract the image to the vserver's root... *sigh* 1106762279 M * we2by yea, ok 1106762449 Q * serving Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106762611 Q * Duckx Quit: Leaving 1106762902 M * we2by www.linux-vserver.org/ down?? 1106762949 M * Doener seems to be... happens often these days :( 1106763028 J * Pazzo ~thomas@host130-250.pool8172.interbusiness.it 1106763084 M * Doener hi Pazzo! 1106763126 M * Pazzo hi doener! 1106763166 M * Pazzo what's up with http://www.linux-vserver.org/? 1106763187 M * Doener gotta wait for Bertl_oO to get that answered :( 1106763193 J * dchouinard ~dchouinar@142.217.213.125 1106763224 J * sannes ~ace@home.skarby.no 1106763248 M * Doener hm, seems a broken webserver is a good way to get folks in here ;) 1106763256 M * we2by :) 1106765798 N * chris|sleep chrish01_ 1106766304 M * mikelcu woops 1106766310 M * mikelcu hah mistype 1106766627 J * pulsar ~pulsar@82.209.237.8 1106766630 M * pulsar Hi ! 1106766736 M * pulsar I know KERNEL: assertion ((int)tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) >= 0) failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1170) is not vserver issue . But can anyone can help me with this issue. Server friz after this message... 1106766993 M * pulsar acording tcp_input.c -> BUG_TRAP((int)tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) >= 0); 1106767111 J * prae ~prae@sherpadown.net 1106767267 Q * we2by Remote host closed the connection 1106767298 J * we2by ~jinxi@145.116.6.75 1106767605 Q * chrish01 Quit: chrish01 1106767611 N * chrish01_ chrish01 1106767862 J * monrad ~monrad@213083190130.sonofon.dk 1106769354 J * serving ~serving@213.186.187.93 1106769457 M * chrish01 Bertl_oO, please ping me when you get back in. 1106771721 M * we2by http://linux-vserver.org/ still down 1106771721 M * we2by :( 1106771859 Q * we2by Remote host closed the connection 1106772004 Q * dchouinard Quit: using sirc version 2.211+KSIRC/1.3.9 1106772024 J * we2by ~jinxi@145.116.6.75 1106772522 N * Bertl_oO Bertl 1106772539 M * Bertl evening folks! 1106772548 M * Bertl chrish01: ping! 1106772555 M * chrish01 Bertl, hey dude 1106772561 M * chrish01 you get my segfault output? 1106772584 M * Bertl yep, saw it ... 1106772595 M * Bertl you should not use PREEMPTion for now ;) 1106772600 M * chrish01 ok will do 1106772610 M * chrish01 not that important for what im using anyway 1106772629 M * Bertl I doubt that it is important for any server use ... 1106772703 M * Bertl we2by: it's working again now ... 1106772714 M * mugwump Bertl: anything realtime... 1106772725 M * mugwump and good evening to you too :) 1106772765 M * Bertl evening sam! yeah, but I doubt that you would use linux-vserver for realtime stuff, eh? 1106772870 M * mugwump movie studios might like that sort of thing.. 1106772909 M * mugwump but that's pushing it. they generally just buy more hardware 1106773148 M * mugwump In my idle fantasies about building server clusters as reliable as a Tandem with commodity hardware, OpenMOSIX (et al) and Linux Vserver, realtime would be important 1106773185 M * mugwump but it's also a PITA to get right. 1106773187 M * Bertl well, I guess you might be interested in the long term gfs plans then ... 1106773199 M * mugwump gfs? 1106773225 M * mugwump Global File System 1106773279 M * mugwump interesting 1106773291 M * Bertl yep 1106773504 Q * mhepp Quit: mhepp caught signal: Autobus error 1106774184 Q * we2by Remote host closed the connection 1106774247 Q * mboman Quit: One day I'll get that peer and reset HIS connection! 1106774299 M * ntrs_ Bertl, just wanted to report back that the xid fix fixed patch works just fine. 1106774307 N * ntrs_ ntrs 1106774468 M * Bertl thanks! 1106774541 M * Pazzo Hi Bertl! 1106774568 M * Pazzo I see that linux-vserver.org is back again - what happened to it? 1106774936 M * Bertl nothing, apache/mysql got bored 1106774956 M * Bertl (guess the number of hits is increasing, and I need to update both) 1106775871 J * we2by ~jinxi@145.116.6.75 1106775874 M * Pazzo apache getting bored? that's cool - probably a new vserver-feature, isn't it? ;-p 1106775956 M * Bertl of course, it's the VXF_BORING flag ;) 1106775979 M * Pazzo *gg* 1106776025 M * Bertl no actually it seems like the php threads become stuck somehow ... and do not respond to new requests ... 1106776042 M * Pazzo VXF_BORING -> vattribute --set --xid 120 --flag ^00 1106776051 M * we2by is the site still down? 1106776062 M * Bertl nope, it's working fine now ... 1106776086 M * Pazzo Bertl: php module or cgi? 1106776095 M * Bertl mod_php 1106776147 M * Pazzo strange... version? 1106776289 M * Bertl Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in .... transforms.php on line 84 1106776305 M * Bertl and line 84 is ... 1106776306 M * Bertl $Entity[count($Entity)] = $array; 1106776318 M * Bertl so nothing unusual IMHO 1106776355 M * Bertl I stop both, mysql and apache ... 1106776373 M * Pazzo http://linux-vserver.org/ -> LIB_ErrorDatabaseSelect ?? 1106776384 J * nayco ~nayco@lns-vlq-47-nan-82-252-240-206.adsl.proxad.net 1106776394 M * nayco 'llo !!! 1106776412 M * Bertl hmm, sec ... checking history ... 1106776425 M * Pazzo hi nayco! 1106776445 M * nayco :) 1106776492 M * we2by [root@6 cpg]# vserver cpg start 1106776492 M * we2by chbind: vc_set_ipv4root(): Function not implemented 1106776510 M * Doener vserver legacy support disabled in kernel config? 1106776532 M * we2by ops 1106776540 M * we2by I didn't boot with the smp kernel 1106776548 M * we2by I mean the one with vserver 1106776570 M * we2by what is the url to get a precompiled 2.6.10-vserver kernel? 1106776572 M * Bertl Pazzo: a deeper look at the cpuload suggests, that I should increase the processing time ... 1106776575 M * we2by I am on FC3 1106776632 M * Doener www.crystalballs-work-for-guessing-kernel-config.net ;) 1106776638 M * Pazzo Bertl: increase the processing time?? 1106776672 M * Doener guess someone put _a lot stuff_ into a single page... more than the wiki can handle 1106776720 M * Bertl Doener: well, yes we had that .. but it looks fine now ... 1106776722 M * Pazzo Doener: "this domain is still available CLICK --> HERE <--CLICK to register now" :) 1106776774 Q * we2by Remote host closed the connection 1106776843 M * Pazzo bertl: not really... 1106776882 M * Bertl Pazzo: hmm? 1106776930 M * Pazzo Try to click on "RecentChanges" or the "Hacker Page" 1106776953 M * Pazzo Still: Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /var/www/tavi-0.25-patched2/parse/transforms.php on line 85 1106776965 J * we2by ~jinxi@145.116.6.75 1106777040 M * Bertl Pazzo: hmm, which page are you looking at? 1106777051 M * Pazzo Bertl: maybe someone hacked the hacker page? (-: 1106777092 M * Pazzo Bertl: linux-vserver.org, the wiki - all pages seem to work, but loading the "Hacker Page" takes a loooooong time > 30 secs 1106777141 M * Bertl hmm, so everybody is now trying to load the hacker page, I guess ;) 1106777152 M * Bertl DDoS ;) 1106777171 M * we2by root@6 jinxi]# vserver-stat 1106777171 M * we2by WARNING: can not access /proc/uptime. Usually, this is caused by 1106777171 M * we2by procfs-security. Please read the FAQ for more details 1106777171 M * we2by http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=Linux-Vserver+FAQ 1106777171 M * we2by open("/proc/uptime"): No such file or directory 1106777171 M * pulsar ;-) 1106777185 M * we2by I get this on the host 1106777214 M * pulsar we2by> Probably vpocunhide not started 1106777255 M * Pazzo Bertl: don't think so... it shouldn't matter if everyone looks at the same page or at different pages. and I don't believe that there is so much traffic... nothing strange in the "HackerPage" history? 1106777256 M * we2by how do I start it? 1106777259 M * nayco /etc/init.d/vprocunhide start ;) 1106777275 M * nayco chkconfig --add vprocunhide 1106777302 M * we2by yea, correct 1106777334 M * Bertl | 39 | Hacker Page | 191 | 1106777334 M * Bertl | 65535 | Hacker Page | 192 | 1106777349 M * Bertl hmm .. maybe 65535 chars is a little too much ;) 1106777372 M * Loki|muh lol ;) 1106777399 M * Bertl let's see what our Master H4x0r5 did write there ... 1106777416 M * Doener we2by: there was a nice warning text, including an url that refers to the faq... sorry, but please _use_ such information when it pops up in front of you... 1106777417 M * we2by vc_new_s_context(): Operation not permitted 1106777438 M * Pazzo bertl: 65535 chars are too much? you should change either wiki or host! 1106777445 M * pulsar we2by> Áre U root ? 1106777451 M * we2by Doener, I thought it was not applied to me, because I am using a recompiled kernel 1106777455 M * we2by nope 1106777461 M * nayco Why not try DokuWiki ? 1106777478 M * we2by I meant precompiled kernel 1106777511 M * Doener nayco: i guess porting all the stuff from tavi to doku would be a mess ;) 1106777528 Q * SiD3WiNDR Ping timeout: 480 seconds 1106777536 M * nayco eerrrr... Well, the "markup" is not the same, that's right. 1106777542 M * Loki|muh but it would be possible to rewrite stuff ;) 1106777562 M * chrish01 Bertl, even with no preempt, i still get that network.c:185 kernel bug 1106777575 M * Bertl chrish01: okay, please upload ... 1106777579 M * chrish01 k 1106777612 M * nayco Maybe some perl mongers could try to convert from tavi to another wiki with some regexp magic... Well ;) 1106777640 M * Bertl nayco: first _proove_ that the new one is better/has less overhead ;) 1106777674 M * Pazzo Doener: wikis are a great thing - all of them are more or less doing the same thing - but everyone with it's own, proprietary syntax... but most of them are opensource products... great! 1106777705 M * Pazzo (I forgot the tags) 1106777714 M * Bertl okay, hacker page restored ... 1106777738 M * Doener Pazzo: ok, the tags were required ;) i actually started thinking you like that mess 1106777739 M * Bertl Pazzo: yes they are open source and that is great, otherwise the current functionality would not be possible ... 1106777740 M * mikelcu something happen to the site? 1106777797 M * chrish01 Bertl, http://people.mosaix.net/chris/private/dmesg-2.6.11-rc2-vs1.9.4-rc3-ng8.12-2.txt 1106777803 M * Bertl mikelcu: nothing unusual, just the usual we want to add our spam to every page we can get ... 1106777831 M * nayco Bertl: You're right ;) I should try stress-load testes :D ! 1106777832 J * SiD3WiNDR luser@bastard-operator.from-hell.be 1106777861 M * mikelcu ugh 1106777876 M * Bertl welcome SiD3WiNDR! 1106777882 M * Pazzo Bertl: was there something special with this hacker page entry or has 65535 chars been too much??? 1106777882 M * chrish01 Bertl, also get bug on context.c:243 when i attempt to use vnet 1106777982 M * sizo re 1106777992 M * Bertl chrish01: hmm, that's interesting ... 1106778009 M * chrish01 it could very well be another config issue that i dont know is not supported 1106778072 M * Bertl looks like a bug in the kernel .... 1106778083 M * chrish01 =P 1106778232 M * Bertl could you try with the same kernel (in vmware) and do nothing on startup? 1106778232 Q * sannes Read error: Connection reset by peer 1106778244 M * Bertl chrish01: do you get any oops then? 1106778255 M * chrish01 im in vmware. no oops, just kernel Bug at ... 1106778260 Q * prae Quit: Pwet 1106778278 M * Bertl okay, do you get the Bug() on bootup? 1106778303 M * chrish01 that first bug happens with starting /etc/init.d/vserver-default (starting first vserver context) 1106778315 M * Bertl okay, could you disable that for now? 1106778326 M * Bertl (just for a test) 1106778338 M * chrish01 sure ... one sec 1106778379 M * chrish01 http://people.mosaix.net/chris/private/dmesg-2.6.11-rc2-vs1.9.4-rc3-ng8.12-3.txt (this shows the context bug at bottom) 1106778472 M * chrish01 Bertl, if i just remove all default vservers will that be fine (since vserver-default will find no vservers to start) 1106778477 M * Bertl Doener, mugwump: you around? 1106778482 M * Doener yup 1106778488 M * Bertl http://people.mosaix.net/chris/private/dmesg-2.6.11-rc2-vs1.9.4-rc3-ng8.12-2.txt 1106778507 M * Bertl looks to me like spin_is_locked() does trigger some spinlock debugging stuff?! 1106778511 M * chrish01 see -3.txt for more info 1106778778 M * chrish01 Bertl, no bug intil vserver started 1106778819 M * chrish01 so if i start with no vservers ... full bootup is fine 1106778864 M * Bertl okay, could you try now a simple 'chcontext --ctx 100 true' please? 1106778884 M * Bertl and see, IMHO it should give you _at least_ one Bug() 1106778886 M * chrish01 yup, bug :) 1106778908 M * Pazzo good night @all! 1106778914 M * Doener night Pazzo ! 1106778916 M * Bertl night Pazzo! 1106778916 M * chrish01 context.c:243 ... spin_is_locked by context.c/300 1106778919 Q * Pazzo Quit: byebye... 1106778958 M * chrish01 Bertl, you want stack trace? 1106778967 M * Bertl yes please! 1106778984 M * Bertl Doener: either I'm very confused, or the spinlock debug stuff is broken?! 1106779058 M * chrish01 http://people.mosaix.net/chris/private/dmesg-2.6.11-rc2-vs1.9.4-rc3-ng8.12-4.txt 1106779103 M * Bertl tx 1106779107 M * chrish01 np 1106779334 M * Doener Bertl: well, the responsible code wasn't changed since feb 03 1106779352 M * Doener feb 2003 that is... 1106779446 M * Bertl hmm, so it's probably me being confused then? 1106779719 Q * micah Quit: Lost terminal 1106779879 M * Bertl chrish01: for now, just disable spinlock debugging ... 1106779952 M * chrish01 hmm ok 1106779987 M * chrish01 what does that do ... just hide the bug message? 1106779998 M * Bertl but really strange actually, I compile with SMP, SPINLOCK_DEBUG, SLEEP_DEBUG, VSERVER_DEBUG and don't get this message at all 1106780051 M * Bertl seems to 'just work fine' here ... 1106780061 Q * pulsar Quit: Leaving 1106780065 M * chrish01 hmm interesting 1106780086 M * Doener Bertl: that's UP only 1106780098 M * Bertl hum? 1106780105 M * chrish01 yea, my vmware is single proc ... i deploy on SMP though 1106780108 M * Doener * FALSE. --> printk if already locked. */ 1106780124 M * Doener /* without debugging, spin_is_locked on UP always says 1106780124 M * Doener * FALSE. --> printk if already locked. */ 1106780132 M * Doener stupid slash... 1106780153 M * Bertl aaah! 1106780165 M * Bertl okay, chrish01, you compiled the kernel UP, right? 1106780182 M * chrish01 no, its compiled with smp so i can run on either vmware or real smp box 1106780205 M * Bertl chrish01: you're sure about that? 1106780218 M * chrish01 ill check config quick 1106780241 M * chrish01 ah fuck your right ... i disabled smp yesterday 1106780270 M * Bertl no problem, and thanks for spotting this! ;) 1106780273 M * chrish01 should i re enable smp? 1106780288 M * Bertl yeah, for now that should do the trick ;) 1106780301 M * chrish01 most of our new deployment hardware will be single proc xeon p4's with HT 1106780361 M * Bertl (which can be considered SMP anyways ;) 1106780372 M * Doener Bertl: hm, how many people are on the vserver ml? can martin demand the $5? 1106780375 M * Doener ;) 1106780377 M * chrish01 Bertl, yea 1106780387 M * Doener uhm... oops... wrong list... 1106780408 M * Bertl hum? 1106780419 M * Doener already wondered how the spam made it to the list... 1106780426 M * Doener nvm, was on the fvwm list... 1106780559 M * Bertl Doener: so we add an additional check for SMP for the vxd_asser_lock() right? 1106780994 M * Doener yup 1106781154 M * Bertl but what is the purpose of CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK when SMP is disabled? 1106781193 M * Doener to find out if you're by chance trying to dead lock? 1106781272 M * Bertl hum, does it work at all? 1106781439 M * Doener not on up, i guess it's just to make spinlock debugging possible on up at all... 1106781593 M * mugwump spinlocks shouldn't even be used on up, surely 1106781694 M * Doener yep, they're nops if spinlock debugging is disabled 1106781719 M * Doener with debugging enabled the locks just get set/unset, without any real locking happening 1106781752 M * Bertl so if they get set/unset, why does spin_is_locked return FALSE ? 1106781789 M * Bertl IMHO something is wrong here ... 1106781827 M * Bertl either: a) UP disables spinlocks completely -> spin_is_locked returns false, DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not possible/selectable 1106781858 M * Bertl or b) UP disables spinlocks but not spinlock debugging -> spin_is_locked() returns correct lock values, DEBUG_SPINLOCK is possible 1106781908 M * mugwump maybe you need spinlocks on up with preemption 1106781927 M * mugwump and then entering a locked spinlock is an automatic preemption point 1106781944 M * mugwump preferably to the task holding the spinlock :) 1106782010 M * Doener Bertl: because the spin is not really locked... it's just 'set' to allow debugging using those printk's... spin_is_locked always returns false on UP and debugging should not change that 1106782051 M * Doener otherwise some while(spin_is_locked(&some_spin)) loop would hang indefinitely on UP + debugging 1106782071 M * Bertl okay, good point! 1106782086 M * mugwump isn't there a more fundamental problem here - if the spinlock *is* held, you basically have to spin on it until the next resched happens 1106782103 M * mugwump no, I'm being silly 1106782126 M * mugwump code holding spinlocks doesn't happen over rescheds on non-preempt up 1106782238 M * Bertl Doener: so the 'better' solution would be to add a check_that_spin_would_be_locked_if_debug_enabled() ;) 1106782350 M * Doener i've had a look at some other code snippets using spin_is_locked, they're within #ifdef DEBUG_SPINLOCKS, have the assertion macro dependent on CONFIG_SMP or the function is written in a way that UP never hits the spin_is_locked 1106782433 M * Bertl i.c., but I _think_ that we actually want CHECK_LOCK(x) there ... 1106782470 M * Bertl hmm, nope, 1106782603 M * Bertl it looks to me that nobody thought about preventive spinlock testing on UP ... 1106782639 M * chrish01 im very satisfied with the quality of your smp work :) 1106782797 M * Bertl thanks ;) 1106782884 M * chrish01 its also my intention to send a little more cash to the way of the ngnet devs as soon as we get more funding 1106782903 M * Bertl sounds good too ;) 1106783896 Q * nayco Quit: Bonne nuit !